• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

幼儿身体活动测量中时段与单轴加速度计和三轴加速度计的比较:一项验证研究。

Comparison of epoch and uniaxial versus triaxial accelerometers in the measurement of physical activity in preschool children: a validation study.

作者信息

Hislop Jane F, Bulley Cathy, Mercer Tom H, Reilly John J

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2012 Aug;24(3):450-60. doi: 10.1123/pes.24.3.450.

DOI:10.1123/pes.24.3.450
PMID:22971560
Abstract

The objectives of this study were to explore whether triaxial is more accurate than uniaxial accelerometry and whether shorter sampling periods (epochs) are more accurate than longer epochs. Physical activity data from uniaxial and triaxial (RT3) devices were collected in 1-s epochs from 31 preschool children (15 males, 16 females, 4.4 ± 0.8 yrs) who were videoed while they engaged in 1-hr of free-play. Video data were coded using the Children's Activity Rating Scale (CARS). A significant difference (p < .001) in the number of minutes classified as moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was found between the RT3 and the CARS (p < .002) using the cut point of relaxed walk. No significant difference was found between the GT1M and the CARS or between the RT3 and the CARS using the cut point for light jog. Shorter epochs resulted in significantly greater overestimation of MVPA, with the bias increasing from 0.7 mins at 15-s to 3.2 mins at 60-s epochs for the GT1M and 0 mins to 1.7 mins for the RT3. Results suggest that there was no advantage of a triaxial accelerometer over a uniaxial model. Shorter epochs result in significantly higher number of minutes of MVPA with smaller bias relative to direct observation.

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨三轴加速度计是否比单轴加速度计更准确,以及较短的采样周期(时段)是否比较长的时段更准确。从31名学龄前儿童(15名男性,16名女性,4.4±0.8岁)中收集单轴和三轴(RT3)设备的身体活动数据,采样时段为1秒,这些儿童在进行1小时自由玩耍时被录像。视频数据使用儿童活动评分量表(CARS)进行编码。使用轻松步行的切点,发现RT3和CARS之间在中度至剧烈身体活动(MVPA)分钟数上存在显著差异(p<.001),在GT1M和CARS之间使用轻快慢跑的切点时未发现显著差异。较短的时段导致MVPA的高估显著增加,GT1M的偏差从15秒时的0.7分钟增加到60秒时段时的3.2分钟,RT3从0分钟增加到1.7分钟。结果表明,三轴加速度计相对于单轴模型没有优势。较短的时段导致MVPA分钟数显著增加,相对于直接观察偏差较小。

相似文献

1
Comparison of epoch and uniaxial versus triaxial accelerometers in the measurement of physical activity in preschool children: a validation study.幼儿身体活动测量中时段与单轴加速度计和三轴加速度计的比较:一项验证研究。
Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2012 Aug;24(3):450-60. doi: 10.1123/pes.24.3.450.
2
Comparison of accelerometry cut points for physical activity and sedentary behavior in preschool children: a validation study.学龄前儿童身体活动和久坐行为的加速度计切点比较:一项验证研究。
Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2012 Nov;24(4):563-76. doi: 10.1123/pes.24.4.563.
3
Validation of uniaxial and triaxial accelerometers for the assessment of physical activity in preschool children.验证单轴和三轴加速度计在评估学龄前儿童身体活动中的应用。
J Phys Act Health. 2012 Sep;9(7):944-53. doi: 10.1123/jpah.9.7.944. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
4
Physical activity levels in adults and elderly from triaxial and uniaxial accelerometry. The Tromsø Study.成年人和老年人的三轴和单轴加速度计活动水平。特罗姆瑟研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 3;14(12):e0225670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225670. eCollection 2019.
5
Comparison of uniaxial and triaxial accelerometry in the assessment of physical activity among adolescents under free-living conditions: the HELENA study.在自由生活条件下评估青少年身体活动的单轴和三轴加速度计比较:HELENA 研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Mar 12;12:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-26.
6
Physical education: the effect of epoch lengths on children's physical activity in a structured context.体育教育:在结构化环境中,时段长度对儿童身体活动的影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 13;10(4):e0121238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121238. eCollection 2015.
7
Epoch length and accelerometer outputs in children: comparison to direct observation.儿童的时段长度和加速度计输出:与直接观察的比较
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Dec;40(12):2080-7. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181824d98.
8
Validity of hip-mounted uniaxial accelerometry with heart-rate monitoring vs. triaxial accelerometry in the assessment of free-living energy expenditure in young children: the IDEFICS Validation Study.髋关节单轴加速度计结合心率监测评估法与三轴加速度计评估法评估幼儿自由生活能量消耗的有效性:IDEFICS 验证研究。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012 Nov;113(10):1530-6. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01290.2011. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
9
Moving Forward with Backward Compatibility: Translating Wrist Accelerometer Data.向前兼容:手腕加速度计数据的翻译
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Nov;48(11):2142-2149. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001015.
10
The Influence of Epoch Length on Physical Activity Patterns Varies by Child's Activity Level.时段长度对身体活动模式的影响因儿童的活动水平而异。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2016;87(1):110-23. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2015.1129046.

引用本文的文献

1
Accelerometer based independent and combined associations of physical activity and sedentary time on physical fitness in preschool children: a cross-sectional study.基于加速度计的学前儿童身体活动和久坐时间与体能的独立及综合关联:一项横断面研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 23;15(1):26691. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00626-x.
2
Beyond the (Log)book: Comparing Accelerometer Nonwear Detection Techniques in Toddlers.超越(日志)记录:比较幼儿加速度计非佩戴检测技术
Child Care Health Dev. 2025 Jul;51(4):e70133. doi: 10.1111/cch.70133.
3
Time-matched accelerometers on limbs and waist in children with CP give new insights into real-life activities after botulinum toxin treatment: A proof of concept study.
脑瘫儿童四肢和腰部的时间匹配加速度计在肉毒毒素治疗后对真实生活活动提供了新的见解:概念验证研究。
J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2023;16(1):125-137. doi: 10.3233/PRM-210112.
4
Reliability of the accelerometer to control the effects of physical activity in older adults.加速度计控制老年人身体活动影响的可靠性。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 12;17(9):e0274442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274442. eCollection 2022.
5
Systematic review of accelerometer-based methods for 24-h physical behavior assessment in young children (0-5 years old).基于加速度计的 0-5 岁幼儿 24 小时身体活动评估方法的系统评价。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Sep 8;19(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01296-y.
6
Assessment of 24-hour physical behaviour in children and adolescents via wearables: a systematic review of free-living validation studies.通过可穿戴设备评估儿童和青少年的24小时身体行为:自由生活验证研究的系统评价
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2022 May 12;8(2):e001267. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001267. eCollection 2022.
7
A systematic review of the validity, reliability, and feasibility of measurement tools used to assess the physical activity and sedentary behaviour of pre-school aged children.系统评价用于评估学龄前儿童身体活动和久坐行为的测量工具的有效性、可靠性和可行性。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Nov 4;18(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01132-9.
8
Machine Learning Models for Classifying Physical Activity in Free-Living Preschool Children.用于在自由活动的学龄前儿童中分类身体活动的机器学习模型。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Aug 5;20(16):4364. doi: 10.3390/s20164364.
9
Associations between Daily Step Counts and Physical Fitness in Preschool Children.学龄前儿童每日步数与体能的关联
J Clin Med. 2020 Jan 7;9(1):163. doi: 10.3390/jcm9010163.
10
Are preschool children active enough in Shanghai: an accelerometer-based cross-sectional study.上海学龄前儿童的活动量足够吗:基于加速度计的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 25;9(4):e024090. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024090.