Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2056.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Dec 24;110(52):20894-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108772109. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
Recent research has shed light on the cost-effective contribution that agriculture can make to global greenhouse gas abatement; however, the resulting impacts on agricultural production, producer livelihoods, and food security remain largely unexplored. This paper provides an integrated assessment of the linkages between land-based climate policies, development, and food security, with a particular emphasis on abatement opportunities and impacts in the livestock sector. Targeting Annex I countries and exempting non-Annex I countries from land-based carbon policies on equity or food security grounds may result in significant leakage rates for livestock production and agriculture as a whole. We find that such leakage can be eliminated by supplying forest carbon sequestration incentives to non-Annex I countries. Furthermore, substantial additional global agricultural abatement can be attained by extending a greenhouse gas emissions tax to non-Annex I agricultural producers, while compensating them for their additional tax expenses. Because of their relatively large emissions intensities and limited abatement possibilities, ruminant meat producers face the greatest market adjustments to land-based climate policies. We also evaluate the impacts of climate policies on livelihoods and food consumption in developing countries. In the absence of non-Annex I abatement policies, these impacts are modest. However, strong income and food consumption impacts surface because of higher food costs after forest carbon sequestration is promoted at a global scale. Food consumption among unskilled labor households falls but rises for the representative farm households, because global agricultural supplies are restricted and farm prices rise sharply in the face of inelastic food demands.
最近的研究揭示了农业在全球温室气体减排方面具有成本效益的贡献;然而,其对农业生产、生产者生计和粮食安全的影响在很大程度上仍未得到探索。本文综合评估了基于土地的气候政策、发展和粮食安全之间的联系,特别强调了减排机会和牲畜部门的影响。基于公平或粮食安全的理由,针对附件一国家并豁免非附件一国家实施基于土地的碳政策,可能导致牲畜生产和整个农业的大量泄漏率。我们发现,通过向非附件一国家提供森林碳固存激励措施,可以消除这种泄漏。此外,通过向非附件一农业生产者征收温室气体排放税,并对其额外的税收支出进行补偿,可以实现更多的全球农业减排。由于其相对较大的排放强度和有限的减排可能性,反刍动物肉类生产者面临着最大的市场调整以适应基于土地的气候政策。我们还评估了气候政策对发展中国家生计和粮食消费的影响。在没有非附件一减排政策的情况下,这些影响是适度的。然而,由于在全球范围内促进森林碳固存会导致更高的粮食成本,因此会出现强烈的收入和粮食消费影响。非熟练劳动力家庭的粮食消费下降,但代表性农户的粮食消费上升,因为全球农业供应受到限制,而且面对无弹性的粮食需求,农场价格急剧上涨。