• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过畜牧业系统转型缓解气候变化。

Climate change mitigation through livestock system transitions.

机构信息

Ecosystems Services and Management Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Mar 11;111(10):3709-14. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1308044111. Epub 2014 Feb 24.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.1308044111
PMID:24567375
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3956143/
Abstract

Livestock are responsible for 12% of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. Sustainable intensification of livestock production systems might become a key climate mitigation technology. However, livestock production systems vary substantially, making the implementation of climate mitigation policies a formidable challenge. Here, we provide results from an economic model using a detailed and high-resolution representation of livestock production systems. We project that by 2030 autonomous transitions toward more efficient systems would decrease emissions by 736 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year (MtCO2e⋅y(-1)), mainly through avoided emissions from the conversion of 162 Mha of natural land. A moderate mitigation policy targeting emissions from both the agricultural and land-use change sectors with a carbon price of US$10 per tCO2e could lead to an abatement of 3,223 MtCO2e⋅y(-1). Livestock system transitions would contribute 21% of the total abatement, intra- and interregional relocation of livestock production another 40%, and all other mechanisms would add 39%. A comparable abatement of 3,068 MtCO2e⋅y(-1) could be achieved also with a policy targeting only emissions from land-use change. Stringent climate policies might lead to reductions in food availability of up to 200 kcal per capita per day globally. We find that mitigation policies targeting emissions from land-use change are 5 to 10 times more efficient--measured in "total abatement calorie cost"--than policies targeting emissions from livestock only. Thus, fostering transitions toward more productive livestock production systems in combination with climate policies targeting the land-use change appears to be the most efficient lever to deliver desirable climate and food availability outcomes.

摘要

牲畜温室气体排放量占人为排放量的 12%。可持续集约化牲畜生产系统可能成为关键的气候缓解技术。然而,牲畜生产系统差异很大,使得实施气候缓解政策成为一项艰巨的挑战。在这里,我们提供了一个经济模型的结果,该模型使用了详细和高分辨率的牲畜生产系统表示。我们预计,到 2030 年,自主向更高效系统的过渡每年将减少 7.36 亿吨二氧化碳当量的排放(MtCO2e⋅y(-1)),主要是通过避免 1.62 亿公顷自然土地转化所产生的排放。一个针对农业和土地利用变化部门排放的适度缓解政策,其碳价格为 10 美元/吨二氧化碳当量(US$10/tCO2e),可能会减少 3223 MtCO2e⋅y(-1)的排放。牲畜系统的转变将贡献总减排量的 21%,牲畜生产的区域内和区域间重新安置将贡献 40%,而所有其他机制将增加 39%。如果政策只针对土地利用变化的排放,也可以实现 3068 MtCO2e⋅y(-1)的减排量。严格的气候政策可能导致全球每人每天的食物供应量减少多达 200 卡路里。我们发现,针对土地利用变化排放的缓解政策比仅针对牲畜排放的政策效率高 5 到 10 倍——以“总减排卡路里成本”来衡量。因此,促进向更高效的牲畜生产系统转变,并结合针对土地利用变化的气候政策,似乎是实现理想的气候和食物供应结果的最有效手段。

相似文献

1
Climate change mitigation through livestock system transitions.通过畜牧业系统转型缓解气候变化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Mar 11;111(10):3709-14. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1308044111. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
2
Global climate policy impacts on livestock, land use, livelihoods, and food security.全球气候政策对畜牧业、土地利用、生计和粮食安全的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Dec 24;110(52):20894-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108772109. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
3
Co-benefits, trade-offs, barriers and policies for greenhouse gas mitigation in the agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) sector.农业、林业和其他土地利用(AFOLU)部门温室气体减排的协同效益、权衡取舍、障碍和政策。
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Oct;20(10):3270-90. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12591. Epub 2014 May 8.
4
Quantifying opportunities for greenhouse gas emissions mitigation using big data from smallholder crop and livestock farmers across Bangladesh.利用孟加拉国小农作物和牲畜农民的大数据量化温室气体减排机会。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Sep 10;786:147344. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147344. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
5
Mitigation Strategies for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agriculture and Land-Use Change: Consequences for Food Prices.农业和土地利用变化温室气体减排策略:对粮食价格的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Jan 3;51(1):365-374. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b04291. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
6
Climate mitigation and the future of tropical landscapes.气候缓解与热带景观的未来。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Nov 16;107(46):19633-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910467107. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
7
Land use efficiency: anticipating future demand for land-sector greenhouse gas emissions abatement and managing trade-offs with agriculture, water, and biodiversity.土地利用效率:预测土地部门温室气体减排的未来需求,并管理与农业、水和生物多样性的权衡。
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Nov;21(11):4098-114. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13020. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
8
Assessing the efficiency of changes in land use for mitigating climate change.评估土地利用变化在缓解气候变化方面的效率。
Nature. 2018 Dec;564(7735):249-253. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0757-z. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
9
Cattle ranching intensification in Brazil can reduce global greenhouse gas emissions by sparing land from deforestation.巴西的畜牧业集约化可以通过避免土地因砍伐森林而减少全球温室气体排放。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 20;111(20):7236-41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1307163111. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
10
Decoupling of greenhouse gas emissions from global agricultural production: 1970-2050.全球农业生产中温室气体排放的脱钩:1970-2050 年。
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Feb;22(2):763-81. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13120. Epub 2016 Jan 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Recent stabilization of agricultural non-CO greenhouse gas emissions in China.中国近期农业非二氧化碳温室气体排放的稳定状况。
Natl Sci Rev. 2025 Feb 13;12(4):nwaf040. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwaf040. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Mechanism of Textural Reorganization in Silkworm Chrysalis and Pea Protein Extrusion: Structural Evolution and Quality Characteristic.家蚕蛹与豌豆蛋白挤压过程中的质地重组机制:结构演变与品质特性
Foods. 2025 Mar 25;14(7):1134. doi: 10.3390/foods14071134.
3
Carbon footprints of greenhouse gas mitigation measures for a grass-based beef cattle finishing system in the UK.英国基于牧草的肉牛育肥系统温室气体减排措施的碳足迹
Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2025;30(4):654-667. doi: 10.1007/s11367-025-02428-9. Epub 2025 Jan 14.
4
Spatiotemporal Patterns in Production and Consumption of Major Foods in Qinghai, China.中国青海主要食物生产与消费的时空格局
Foods. 2025 Feb 21;14(5):736. doi: 10.3390/foods14050736.
5
Assessing potential reductions of agricultural GHG in countries with different land productivities: Long-term integrated efficiency in DEA hybrid meta-frontier model.评估不同土地生产力国家农业温室气体减排潜力:DEA混合元前沿模型中的长期综合效率
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 4;20(2):e0315571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315571. eCollection 2025.
6
The impact of climate change on Korea's agricultural sector under the national self-sufficiency policy.在国家自给自足政策下气候变化对韩国农业部门的影响。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 24;20(1):e0313748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313748. eCollection 2025.
7
Uncertainties around net-zero climate targets have major impact on greenhouse gas emissions projections.净零气候目标的不确定性对温室气体排放预测有重大影响。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2025 Feb;1544(1):209-222. doi: 10.1111/nyas.15285. Epub 2025 Jan 12.
8
Understanding Uncertainty in Market-Mediated Responses to US Oilseed Biodiesel Demand: Sensitivity of ILUC Emission Estimates to GLOBIOM Parametric Uncertainty.理解市场对美国油籽生物柴油需求的中介反应中的不确定性:间接土地利用变化(ILUC)排放估计对全球生物能源模型(GLOBIOM)参数不确定性的敏感性。
Environ Sci Technol. 2025 Jan 14;59(1):302-314. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c09944. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
9
Monogastric intensification benefits for emission reductions and food security.单胃动物集约化养殖对减排和粮食安全有益。
Nat Food. 2024 Nov;5(11):890-891. doi: 10.1038/s43016-024-01068-w.
10
Enhanced agricultural carbon sinks provide benefits for farmers and the climate.增强农业碳汇为农民和气候带来好处。
Nat Food. 2024 Sep;5(9):742-753. doi: 10.1038/s43016-024-01039-1. Epub 2024 Sep 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems.全球牲畜系统的生物质利用、生产、饲料效率和温室气体排放。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Dec 24;110(52):20888-93. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1308149110.
2
How much land-based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals?在不影响粮食安全和环境目标的情况下,能实现多少陆基温室气体减排?
Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Aug;19(8):2285-302. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12160. Epub 2013 May 29.
3
Mitigating climate change: the role of domestic livestock.缓解气候变化:家畜的作用
Animal. 2010 Mar;4(3):323-33. doi: 10.1017/S1751731109004662.
4
Agriculture. What next for agriculture after Durban?农业。德班会议之后农业的下一步走向是什么?
Science. 2012 Jan 20;335(6066):289-90. doi: 10.1126/science.1217941.
5
Trading carbon for food: global comparison of carbon stocks vs. crop yields on agricultural land.用碳换粮:全球农业土地碳储量与作物产量比较。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Nov 16;107(46):19645-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011078107. Epub 2010 Nov 1.
6
Livestock production and the global environment: consume less or produce better?畜牧业生产与全球环境:减少消费还是提高生产效率?
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Oct 26;107(43):18237-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1012541107. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
7
Potential for reduced methane and carbon dioxide emissions from livestock and pasture management in the tropics.热带地区减少畜牧业和牧场管理甲烷和二氧化碳排放的潜力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Nov 16;107(46):19667-72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912890107. Epub 2010 Sep 7.
8
Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s.20 世纪 80 年代和 90 年代,热带森林是新农业用地的主要来源。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Sep 21;107(38):16732-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910275107. Epub 2010 Aug 31.
9
Competition for land.土地竞争。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 27;365(1554):2941-57. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0127.
10
Livestock production: recent trends, future prospects.畜牧业生产:近期趋势与未来展望。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 27;365(1554):2853-67. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0134.