Institute of Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049806. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
The 2009 H1N1 pandemic left a legacy of mistrust in the public relative to how outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases are managed. To prepare for future outbreaks, it is crucial to explore the phenomenon of public trust in the institutions responsible for managing disease outbreaks. We investigated the evolution of public trust in institutions during and after the 2009 pandemic in Switzerland. We also explored respondents' perceptions of the prevention campaign and the roles of the government and media.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A two-wave longitudinal survey was mailed to 2,400 members of the Swiss public. Wave 1 was in Spring 2009. Wave 2 was in Spring 2010. Six hundred and two participants responded in both waves. Participants indicated moderate to high levels of trust in medical organizations, the WHO, the Swiss government, the pharmaceutical industry, and the EU. On the other hand, trust in the media was low. Moreover, trust in almost all institutions decreased over time. Participants were satisfied with the amount of information received and indicated having followed official recommendations, but widespread concerns about the vaccine were evident. A large majority of participants agreed the vaccine might have unknown or undesirable side effects. Perceptions of the government's and the media's role in handling the outbreak were characterized by a substantial degree of skepticism and mistrust.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Results show clear patterns of skepticism and mistrust on the part of the public relative to various institutions and their actions. Results underscore the importance of systematically investigating trust of the public relative to epidemics. Moreover, studies investigating the evolution of the public's memories of the pandemic over the coming years may be important to understand reactions to future pandemics. A systematic research program on trust can inform public health communication campaigns, enabling tailored communication initiatives.
2009 年 H1N1 大流行导致公众对管理新发传染病爆发的方式产生了不信任。为了为未来的疫情做好准备,探索公众对负责管理疫情爆发的机构的信任现象至关重要。我们调查了瑞士在 2009 年大流行期间和之后公众对机构信任的演变。我们还探讨了受访者对预防运动以及政府和媒体的作用的看法。
方法/主要发现:对瑞士公众中的 2400 名成员进行了两次纵向调查。第 1 波是在 2009 年春季,第 2 波是在 2010 年春季。602 名参与者在两波中均作出了回应。参与者对医疗机构、世界卫生组织、瑞士政府、制药行业和欧盟表示出中等至高度的信任。另一方面,对媒体的信任度较低。此外,随着时间的推移,几乎所有机构的信任度都有所下降。参与者对收到的信息量表示满意,并表示已经遵循了官方建议,但对疫苗的广泛担忧显而易见。绝大多数参与者同意疫苗可能有未知或不良的副作用。对政府和媒体在处理疫情方面的作用的看法,表现出对各种机构及其行为的高度怀疑和不信任。
结论/意义:结果显示出公众对各个机构及其行为持明显的怀疑和不信任态度。结果强调了系统调查公众对流行病的信任的重要性。此外,在未来几年内对公众对大流行的记忆的演变进行研究可能对于了解对未来大流行的反应很重要。关于信任的系统研究项目可以为公共卫生传播运动提供信息,从而使针对性的传播倡议成为可能。