Suppr超能文献

正常眼、表层屈光手术后和板层屈光手术后不同眼压测量技术的比较。

Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes, post surface and post lamellar refractive surgery.

作者信息

Shousha Shireen Ma, Abo Steit Mahmoud Ah, Hosny Mohamed Hm, Ewais Wael A, Shalaby Ahmad Mm

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:71-9. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S37978. Epub 2013 Jan 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or epithelial laser in situ keratomileusis (Epi)-LASIK using Goldmann applanation tonometry, air puff tonometry, ocular response analyzer corneal compensated IOP (ORA IOPcc) and Pentacam corrected IOP.

METHODS

A prospective comparative clinical study was conducted between February and September 2011 on 30 eyes divided into four groups, i.e. 20 corneas of 10 patients before LASIK (group A), 20 corneas of the same patients 2 months postoperatively (group B), 10 corneas of five patients before Epi-LASIK (group C), and 10 corneas of the same patients 2 months postoperatively (group D). Patient age ranged from 20 to 50 years. IOP was measured using Goldmann applanation and air puff tonometry, ORA corneal compensation, and Pentacam correction (which also measured central corneal thickness).

RESULTS

Significant positive linear correlations were found between IOP values measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry and other techniques, and with preoperative pachymetry in group A. The correlation between preoperative Pentacam-corrected and preoperative ORA corneal-compensated IOP was strongest for Goldmann applanation tonometry (r = 0.97 and r = 0.858 respectively, P < 0.001). Compared with preoperative values, postoperative IOP measured by the four methods were significantly lower. The difference was statistically significant when IOP was measured using Goldmann applanation and air puff tonometry compared with the ORA and Pentacam methods (P < 0.001 for LASIK patients and P = 0.017 for Epi-LASIK patients). Nonsignificant correlations were found between the degree of lowering of postoperative IOP and postoperative pachymetry in groups B and D.

CONCLUSION

Refractive surgery causes significant lowering of IOP as measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry, air puff tonometry, ORA compensation, and Pentacam correction. LASIK has a greater effect than Epi-LASIK on IOP measurement error following refractive surgery.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是使用Goldmann压平眼压计、气流眼压计、眼反应分析仪角膜补偿眼压(ORA IOPcc)和Pentacam校正眼压,确定准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)或上皮瓣准分子原位角膜磨镶术(Epi)-LASIK后眼压(IOP)测量的准确性。

方法

2011年2月至9月对30只眼进行了一项前瞻性比较临床研究,将其分为四组,即10例患者LASIK术前的20只角膜(A组),同一患者术后2个月的20只角膜(B组),5例患者Epi-LASIK术前的10只角膜(C组),以及同一患者术后2个月的10只角膜(D组)。患者年龄在20至50岁之间。使用Goldmann压平眼压计和气流眼压计、ORA角膜补偿以及Pentacam校正(同时测量中央角膜厚度)来测量眼压。

结果

Goldmann压平眼压计测量的IOP值与其他技术测量的IOP值之间,以及与A组术前角膜厚度测量值之间,均存在显著的正线性相关性。对于Goldmann压平眼压计,术前Pentacam校正眼压与术前ORA角膜补偿眼压之间的相关性最强(分别为r = 0.97和r = 0.858,P < 0.001)。与术前值相比,四种方法测量的术后眼压均显著降低。与ORA和Pentacam方法相比,使用Goldmann压平眼压计和气流眼压计测量眼压时,差异具有统计学意义(LASIK患者P < 0.001,Epi-LASIK患者P = 0.017)。B组和D组术后眼压降低程度与术后角膜厚度之间未发现显著相关性。

结论

屈光手术导致使用Goldmann压平眼压计、气流眼压计、ORA补偿和Pentacam校正测量的眼压显著降低。LASIK对屈光手术后眼压测量误差的影响大于Epi-LASIK。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9037/3544333/7ba2b9252e9b/opth-7-071f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验