Suppr超能文献

纽约市公立学校实施非药物干预措施预防 2009 年甲型流感

Implementation of non-pharmaceutical interventions by New York City public schools to prevent 2009 influenza A.

机构信息

Epidemic Intelligence Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e50916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050916. Epub 2013 Jan 15.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Children are important transmitters of influenza in the community and a number of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), including hand washing and use of hand sanitizer, have been recommended to mitigate the transmission of influenza, but limited information is available regarding schools' ability to implement these NPIs during an influenza outbreak. We evaluated implementation of NPIs during fall 2009 in response to H1N1 pandemic influenza (pH1N1) by New York City (NYC) public schools.

METHODS

From January 25 through February 9, 2010, an online survey was sent to all the 1,632 NYC public schools and principals were asked to participate in the survey or to designate a school nurse or other school official with knowledge of school policies and characteristics to do so.

RESULTS

Of 1,633 schools, 376(23%) accessed and completed the survey. Nearly all respondents (99%) implemented at least two NPIs. Schools that had a Flu Response Team (FRT) as a part of school emergency preparedness plan were more likely to implement the NPI guidelines recommended by NYC public health officials than schools that did not have a FRT. Designation of a room for isolating ill students, for example, was more common in schools with a FRT (72%) than those without (53%) (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing an NPI program in a large school system to mitigate the effects of an influenza outbreak is feasible, but there is potential need for additional resources in some schools to increase capacity and adherence to all recommendations. Public health influenza-preparedness plans should include school preparedness planning and FRTs.

摘要

简介

儿童是社区中流感的重要传播者,为了减轻流感的传播,已经推荐了一些非药物干预措施(NPIs),包括洗手和使用手部消毒剂,但关于学校在流感爆发期间实施这些 NPIs 的能力,可用的信息有限。我们评估了 2009 年秋季纽约市(NYC)公立学校针对 H1N1 大流行流感(pH1N1)实施 NPIs 的情况。

方法

从 2010 年 1 月 25 日至 2 月 9 日,向所有 1632 所纽约市公立学校发送了在线调查,要求校长参与调查,或指定一名了解学校政策和特点的学校护士或其他学校官员参与调查。

结果

在 1633 所学校中,有 376 所(23%)访问并完成了调查。几乎所有的受访者(99%)都实施了至少两项 NPIs。作为学校应急准备计划的一部分,有流感应对小组(FRT)的学校比没有 FRT 的学校更有可能实施纽约市公共卫生官员推荐的 NPI 指南。例如,指定一个房间来隔离生病的学生,在有 FRT 的学校中更为常见(72%),而没有 FRT 的学校中则不太常见(53%)(p<0.001)。

结论

在一个大型学校系统中实施 NPI 计划以减轻流感爆发的影响是可行的,但一些学校可能需要额外的资源来增加能力并遵守所有建议。公共卫生流感准备计划应包括学校准备计划和 FRT。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验