Department of Social Anthropology, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Med Anthropol Q. 2012 Dec;26(4):470-85. doi: 10.1111/maq.12002.
This article addresses life on antiretroviral therapy in rural Tanzania. It argues that a nuanced understanding of theories of biosociality requires us to take sociality and locality as seriously as we do "bio." People living with HIV associate on the basis of preexisting social relations, not just on the basis of their biological status. Their CD4 counts do not only measure immunological processes but also index social conditions of hunger. The pharmaceutical that gives them life insists that they eat and rest more than austere financial circumstances allow. Many join HIV groups, but these do not enable the kinds of "citizenship" that have been described elsewhere. Patient activism is stifled by bureaucratic antipolitics mechanisms inherited from postcolonial restrictions on political association. Instead, they enter an NGO economy that values their biological status because they attract income from donors, but does little to enable the living that they need.
本文探讨了坦桑尼亚农村地区接受抗逆转录病毒疗法的人群的生活状况。它认为,要深入理解生物社会性理论,我们不仅需要像重视“生物”因素一样重视社会性和地方性,还需要认识到,HIV 感染者之间的联系是基于他们预先存在的社会关系,而不仅仅是基于他们的生物学状况。他们的 CD4 计数不仅衡量免疫过程,还反映饥饿等社会状况。为他们提供生命的药物不仅要求他们吃得更多、休息得更多,而且还要求他们在经济拮据的情况下这样做。许多人加入了 HIV 群体,但这些群体并不能实现其他地方所描述的那种“公民身份”。由于后殖民时期对政治结社的限制所继承下来的官僚主义反政治机制,患者的行动主义受到了抑制。相反,他们进入了一个非政府组织经济,该经济看重他们的生物学地位,因为他们能从捐助者那里吸引收入,但对他们所需的生活却几乎没有提供帮助。