Suppr超能文献

中国读者在阅读时是否遵循分词的国家标准规则?

Do Chinese readers follow the national standard rules for word segmentation during reading?

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55440. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055440. Epub 2013 Feb 8.

Abstract

We conducted a preliminary study to examine whether Chinese readers' spontaneous word segmentation processing is consistent with the national standard rules of word segmentation based on the Contemporary Chinese language word segmentation specification for information processing (CCLWSSIP). Participants were asked to segment Chinese sentences into individual words according to their prior knowledge of words. The results showed that Chinese readers did not follow the segmentation rules of the CCLWSSIP, and their word segmentation processing was influenced by the syntactic categories of consecutive words. In many cases, the participants did not consider the auxiliary words, adverbs, adjectives, nouns, verbs, numerals and quantifiers as single word units. Generally, Chinese readers tended to combine function words with content words to form single word units, indicating they were inclined to chunk single words into large information units during word segmentation. Additionally, the "overextension of monosyllable words" hypothesis was tested and it might need to be corrected to some degree, implying that word length have an implicit influence on Chinese readers' segmentation processing. Implications of these results for models of word recognition and eye movement control are discussed.

摘要

我们进行了一项初步研究,以检验中国读者的自发分词处理是否与基于信息处理的现代汉语分词规范(CCLWSSIP)的国家标准分词规则一致。参与者被要求根据自己对单词的先验知识将中文句子分割成单个单词。结果表明,中国读者并没有遵循 CCLWSSIP 的分词规则,他们的分词处理受到连续单词的句法类别影响。在许多情况下,参与者并没有将助词、副词、形容词、名词、动词、数字和量词视为单个单词单位。一般来说,中国读者倾向于将功能词与内容词组合成单个单词单位,这表明他们在分词时倾向于将单个单词组合成大的信息单位。此外,还测试了“单音节词过度扩展”假说,并且可能需要在一定程度上进行修正,这表明单词长度对中国读者的分词处理有隐含影响。讨论了这些结果对单词识别和眼动控制模型的意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0926/3568123/01fe1f64816c/pone.0055440.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Do Chinese readers follow the national standard rules for word segmentation during reading?
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55440. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055440. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
2
Early, but not overwhelming: The effect of prior context on segmenting overlapping ambiguous strings when reading Chinese.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Sep;73(9):1382-1395. doi: 10.1177/1747021820926012. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
3
An integrated model of word processing and eye-movement control during Chinese reading.
Psychol Rev. 2020 Nov;127(6):1139-1162. doi: 10.1037/rev0000248. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
4
On the segmentation of Chinese incremental words.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Aug;47(8):1353-1368. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000984. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
5
Contrasting off-line segmentation decisions with on-line word segmentation during reading.
Br J Psychol. 2021 Aug;112(3):662-689. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12482. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
6
Eye movement guidance in Chinese reading: is there a preferred viewing location?
Vision Res. 2011 May 25;51(10):1146-56. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.03.004. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
7
The use of probabilistic lexicality cues for word segmentation in Chinese reading.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(3):548-60. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1061030. Epub 2015 Jul 11.
8
Inserting spaces before and after words affects word processing differently in Chinese: Evidence from eye movements.
Br J Psychol. 2014 Feb;105(1):57-68. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12013. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
9
Chinese readers utilize emotion information for word segmentation.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Aug;31(4):1548-1557. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02436-6. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
10
Word segmentation by alternating colors facilitates eye guidance in Chinese reading.
Mem Cognit. 2018 Jul;46(5):729-740. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0797-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Offline visit intention of online patients: the Grice's maxims and patient involvement.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Mar 6;25(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02861-8.
2
A corpus of Chinese word segmentation agreement.
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 28;57(1):25. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02528-8.
3
Towards a model of eye-movement control in Chinese reading.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Apr;32(2):493-527. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02570-9. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
4
A large dataset of semantic ratings and its computational extension.
Sci Data. 2023 Feb 23;10(1):106. doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-01995-6.
5
GECO-CN: Ghent Eye-tracking COrpus of sentence reading for Chinese-English bilinguals.
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Sep;55(6):2743-2763. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01931-3. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
6
Effects of Spacing on Sentence Reading in Chinese.
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 10;12:765335. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.765335. eCollection 2021.
7
Contrasting off-line segmentation decisions with on-line word segmentation during reading.
Br J Psychol. 2021 Aug;112(3):662-689. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12482. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
9
The role of character positional frequency on Chinese word learning during natural reading.
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 14;12(11):e0187656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187656. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Inserting spaces before and after words affects word processing differently in Chinese: Evidence from eye movements.
Br J Psychol. 2014 Feb;105(1):57-68. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12013. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
3
Word knowledge influences character perception.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Oct;18(5):833-9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0115-8.
4
Extending the e-z reader model of eye movement control to chinese readers.
Cogn Sci. 2007 Nov 12;31(6):1021-33. doi: 10.1080/03640210701703824.
5
Flexible saccade-target selection in Chinese reading.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Apr;63(4):705-25. doi: 10.1080/17470210903114858. Epub 2009 Sep 8.
6
Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Aug;62(8):1457-506. doi: 10.1080/17470210902816461. Epub 2009 May 14.
7
On the segmentation of Chinese words during reading.
Cogn Psychol. 2009 Jun;58(4):525-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.02.003. Epub 2009 Apr 5.
8
Reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text: evidence from eye movements.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Oct;34(5):1277-87. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1277.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验