Suppr超能文献

[使用与不使用荧光素时Goldmann压平眼压计测量结果的差异]

[Differences in the measurement results of Goldmann applanation tonometry with and without fluorescein].

作者信息

Arend N, Hirneiss C, Kernt M

机构信息

Augenklinik, Klinikum der Universität München, Campus Innenstadt, Mathildenstr. 8, 80336, München, Deutschland,

出版信息

Ophthalmologe. 2014 Mar;111(3):241-6. doi: 10.1007/s00347-013-2843-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) is still the gold standard for measuring the intraocular pressure (IOP). Usually fluorescein eye drops are used additional to topical anesthesia to gain the best visualization results. The present study evaluated the differences in the results of GAT with and without fluorescein.

METHODS

A total of 400 eyes of 200 patients without known glaucoma were enrolled in this study and randomized to two groups: group A (first measurement without, second measurement with fluorescein) and group B (first measurement with fluorescein, second without). All measurements were performed by the same examiner with the same slit lamp. Results were analyzed by Bland-Altman plots and Spearman's correlation test.

RESULTS

The examined groups showed no significant differences regarding patient age, astigmatism or reason for consulting. In both groups performing GAT without the application of fluorescein led to significantly lower measurement results. The differences were 1.5 ± 1.7 mmHg SD in group A, 1.2 ± 1.6 mmHg SD in group B and 1.4 ± 1.65 mmHg SD for all eyes. The intraocular pressure (IOP) and the differences between the groups were independent of patient age, astigmatism, reason of consulting or IOP level. Both groups showed outliers up to 10 mmHg difference because of corneal edema.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurements from GAT without fluorescein differed significantly from measurements with fluorescein, independently of patient age, astigmatism, reason for consulting or IOP level. The mean difference of 1.4 mmHg may seem negligible in daily routine but can lead to serious consequences in borderline cases.

摘要

背景

Goldmann压平眼压计(GAT)仍是测量眼压(IOP)的金标准。通常在表面麻醉的基础上额外使用荧光素滴眼液以获得最佳的可视化效果。本研究评估了使用和不使用荧光素时GAT测量结果的差异。

方法

本研究共纳入200例无青光眼病史患者的400只眼,并随机分为两组:A组(首次测量不使用荧光素,第二次测量使用荧光素)和B组(首次测量使用荧光素,第二次测量不使用)。所有测量均由同一名检查者使用同一台裂隙灯进行。结果通过Bland-Altman图和Spearman相关性检验进行分析。

结果

各检查组在患者年龄、散光或就诊原因方面无显著差异。在两组中,不使用荧光素进行GAT测量均导致测量结果显著降低。A组差异为1.5±1.7mmHg标准差,B组为1.2±1.6mmHg标准差,所有眼为1.4±1.65mmHg标准差。眼压(IOP)及组间差异与患者年龄、散光、就诊原因或眼压水平无关。由于角膜水肿,两组均出现高达10mmHg差异的异常值。

结论

不使用荧光素的GAT测量结果与使用荧光素的测量结果存在显著差异,且与患者年龄、散光、就诊原因或眼压水平无关。1.4mmHg的平均差异在日常工作中可能看似微不足道,但在临界病例中可能会导致严重后果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验