• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Factor structure of PTSD symptoms in opioid-dependent patients rating their overall trauma history.阿片类药物依赖患者评定总体创伤史时 PTSD 症状的因子结构。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013 Oct 1;132(3):597-602. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.04.009. Epub 2013 May 3.
2
Support for a novel five-factor model of posttraumatic stress symptoms in three independent samples of Iraq/Afghanistan veterans: a confirmatory factor analytic study.支持创伤后应激症状的新型五因素模型在三个独立的伊拉克/阿富汗退伍军人样本中的应用:一项验证性因素分析研究。
J Psychiatr Res. 2012 Mar;46(3):317-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.11.013. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
3
Dimensional structure of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress symptoms: support for a hybrid Anhedonia and Externalizing Behaviors model.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版创伤后应激症状的维度结构:对快感缺失与外化行为混合模型的支持
J Psychiatr Res. 2015 Feb;61:106-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.10.012. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
4
Evidence for a unique PTSD construct represented by PTSD's D1-D3 symptoms.存在一个独特的 PTSD 结构的证据,由 PTSD 的 D1-D3 症状代表。
J Anxiety Disord. 2011 Apr;25(3):340-5. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.10.007. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
5
PTSD's latent structure in Malaysian tsunami victims: assessing the newly proposed Dysphoric Arousal model.马来西亚海啸幸存者创伤后应激障碍的潜在结构:评估新提出的苦恼唤醒模型。
Psychiatry Res. 2013 Mar 30;206(1):26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.09.012. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
6
Elucidating dimensions of posttraumatic stress symptoms and their functional correlates in disaster-exposed adolescents.阐明灾难暴露青少年创伤后应激症状的维度及其功能相关性。
J Psychiatr Res. 2014 Dec;59:85-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
7
Diagnostic utility and factor structure of the PTSD Checklist in older adults.老年人创伤后应激障碍检查表的诊断效用和因子结构。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2012 Oct;24(10):1684-96. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212000853. Epub 2012 May 30.
8
Elucidating posttraumatic stress symptom dimensions and health correlates among postpartum women.阐述产后妇女创伤后应激症状维度和健康相关性。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Nov 1;294:314-321. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.025. Epub 2021 Jul 18.
9
Structure of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in pain and pain-free patients scheduled for major surgery.计划进行大手术的疼痛患者和无疼痛患者创伤后应激障碍症状的结构
J Pain. 2009 Sep;10(9):984-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.03.011. Epub 2009 Jul 24.
10
Attributional style and anxiety sensitivity as maintenance factors of posttraumatic stress symptoms: A prospective examination of a diathesis-stress model.归因风格和焦虑敏感作为创伤后应激症状的维持因素:素质-应激模型的前瞻性检验。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2009 Dec;40(4):544-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2009.07.005. Epub 2009 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Factor structure of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in persons with serious mental illness.创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)在严重精神疾病患者中的因子结构。
J Ment Health. 2024 Jun;33(3):366-375. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2024.2332809. Epub 2024 May 28.
2
Integrating Unified Medical Language System and Kleinberg's Burst Detection Algorithm into Research Topics of Medications for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.将统一医学语言系统和 Kleinberg 的突发检测算法整合到创伤后应激障碍药物的研究主题中。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2020 Sep 24;14:3899-3913. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S270379. eCollection 2020.
3
Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of Clinician-Administered Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Scale for DSM-5.《用于 DSM-5 的临床医生管理创伤后应激障碍量表的韩文版的信度和效度》。
J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Aug 19;34(32):e219. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e219.
4
Preliminary efficacy and mediators of interpersonal psychotherapy for reducing posttraumatic stress symptoms in an incarcerated population.监狱人群创伤后应激症状的人际心理治疗的初步疗效及中介因素。
Psychother Res. 2020 Feb;30(2):239-250. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2019.1587192. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
5
Reappraising the dimensional structure of the PTSD Checklist: lessons from the DSM-IV-based PCL-C.重新评估 PTSD 清单的维度结构:基于 DSM-IV 的 PCL-C 的经验教训。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2018;40(2):154–162. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2017-2239. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
6
The structure of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in war veterans.退伍军人中《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版创伤后应激障碍症状的结构
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2016 Sep;29(5):497-506. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2015.1081178. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
7
Physical abuse is associated with HIV-related drug risk.身体虐待与艾滋病毒相关的药物风险有关。
Addict Behav. 2014 May;39(5):965-8. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.01.012. Epub 2014 Feb 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Support for a novel five-factor model of posttraumatic stress symptoms in three independent samples of Iraq/Afghanistan veterans: a confirmatory factor analytic study.支持创伤后应激症状的新型五因素模型在三个独立的伊拉克/阿富汗退伍军人样本中的应用:一项验证性因素分析研究。
J Psychiatr Res. 2012 Mar;46(3):317-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.11.013. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
2
The factor structure of posttraumatic stress disorder: a literature update, critique of methodology, and agenda for future research.创伤后应激障碍的因素结构:文献综述、方法学批判及未来研究议程。
J Anxiety Disord. 2011 Aug;25(6):849-54. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.04.007.
3
Evidence for a unique PTSD construct represented by PTSD's D1-D3 symptoms.存在一个独特的 PTSD 结构的证据,由 PTSD 的 D1-D3 症状代表。
J Anxiety Disord. 2011 Apr;25(3):340-5. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.10.007. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
4
A meta-analytic investigation of the structure of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms.创伤后应激障碍症状结构的元分析研究。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2010 Nov;119(4):764-76. doi: 10.1037/a0020981.
5
Structure of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and psychosocial functioning in Veterans of Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom.持久自由行动和伊拉克自由行动的退伍军人创伤后应激障碍症状和社会心理功能的结构。
Psychiatry Res. 2010 Jul 30;178(2):323-9. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.04.039. Epub 2010 May 23.
6
Measurement invariance of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms among U.S. military personnel.创伤后应激障碍症状在美国军人中的测量不变性。
J Trauma Stress. 2010 Feb;23(1):91-9. doi: 10.1002/jts.20492.
7
Assessing posttraumatic stress disorder with or without reference to a single, worst traumatic event: examining differences in factor structure.评估是否参考单一的最严重创伤事件的创伤后应激障碍:检验因子结构的差异。
Psychol Assess. 2009 Dec;21(4):629-34. doi: 10.1037/a0016677.
8
An Empirical Evaluation of the Use of Fixed Cutoff Points in RMSEA Test Statistic in Structural Equation Models.结构方程模型中RMSEA检验统计量固定临界值使用情况的实证评估。
Sociol Methods Res. 2008 Jan 1;36(4):462-494. doi: 10.1177/0049124108314720.
9
Impact of the seeking safety program on clinical outcomes among homeless female veterans with psychiatric disorders.“寻求安全”项目对患有精神疾病的无家可归女性退伍军人临床结局的影响。
Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Sep;59(9):996-1003. doi: 10.1176/ps.2008.59.9.996.
10
The factor structure of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder symptoms among bereaved individuals: a confirmatory factor analysis study.丧亲者创伤后应激障碍症状的因素结构:一项验证性因素分析研究。
J Anxiety Disord. 2008 Dec;22(8):1377-83. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.01.018. Epub 2008 Feb 7.

阿片类药物依赖患者评定总体创伤史时 PTSD 症状的因子结构。

Factor structure of PTSD symptoms in opioid-dependent patients rating their overall trauma history.

机构信息

Psychosocial Research, Butler Hospital, 345 Blackstone Boulevard, Providence, RI 02906, USA; Providence VA Medical Center, 830 Chalkstone Avenue, Building 32, Providence, RI 02908, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Box G-BH, Providence, RI 02912, USA.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013 Oct 1;132(3):597-602. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.04.009. Epub 2013 May 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.04.009
PMID:23647728
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3770833/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The current standard for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnosis is a 3-factor model (re-experiencing, avoidance, and hyperarousal). Two 4-factor models of PTSD, the emotional numbing model (re-experiencing, avoidance, emotional numbing, and hyperarousal) and the dysphoria model (re-experiencing, avoidance, dysphoria, and hyperarousal), have considerable empirical support in the extant literature. However, a newer 5-factor model of PTSD has been introduced that is receiving interest. The 5-factor model differs from the four-factor models in its placement of three symptoms (irritability, sleep disturbance, and concentration difficulties) into a separate cluster termed dysphoric arousal. We empirically compared the theoretical factor structures of 3-, 4-, and 5-factor models of PTSD symptoms to find the best fitting model in a sample of opioid-dependent hospitalized patients.

METHODS

Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted on the 17 self-reported PTSD symptoms of the Posttraumatic Checklist - Civilian Version (PCL-C) in a sample of 151 men and women with opioid dependence.

RESULTS

Both four-factor models fit the observed data better than the three-factor model of PTSD; the dysphoria model was preferred to the emotional numbing model in this sample. The recently introduced five-factor model fit the observed data better than either four factor model.

CONCLUSIONS

PTSD is a heterogeneous disorder comprised of symptoms of re-experiencing, avoidance, numbing, and dysphoria. Three symptoms, irritability, sleep disturbance, and concentration difficulties, may represent a unique latent construct separate from these four symptom clusters in opioid-dependent populations who have experienced traumatic events.

摘要

背景

目前创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的诊断标准是一个三因素模型(再体验、回避和过度警觉)。两个 PTSD 的四因素模型,即情感麻木模型(再体验、回避、情感麻木和过度警觉)和抑郁模型(再体验、回避、抑郁和过度警觉),在现有文献中有相当多的实证支持。然而,一种新的 PTSD 五因素模型已经被引入并受到关注。五因素模型与四因素模型的区别在于将三个症状(易怒、睡眠障碍和注意力困难)置于一个单独的称为“抑郁性唤醒”的集群中。我们在一个阿片类药物依赖住院患者样本中实证比较了 PTSD 症状的三、四和五因素模型的理论因素结构,以找到最适合的模型。

方法

对 151 名男性和女性阿片类药物依赖患者的创伤后检查表-平民版(PCL-C)的 17 项自我报告 PTSD 症状进行验证性因子分析。

结果

四因素模型均比 PTSD 的三因素模型更符合观察数据;在这个样本中,抑郁模型比情感麻木模型更受欢迎。最近引入的五因素模型比任何四因素模型都更符合观察数据。

结论

PTSD 是一种异质障碍,由再体验、回避、麻木和抑郁症状组成。易怒、睡眠障碍和注意力困难这三个症状可能代表了一种独特的潜在结构,与经历过创伤事件的阿片类药物依赖人群中这四个症状集群分开。