Suppr超能文献

重新评估 PTSD 清单的维度结构:基于 DSM-IV 的 PCL-C 的经验教训。

Reappraising the dimensional structure of the PTSD Checklist: lessons from the DSM-IV-based PCL-C.

机构信息

Departamento de Epidemiologia, Instituto de Medicina Social, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

Programa de Mestrado em Saúde da Família, Universidade Estácio de Sá, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz J Psychiatry. 2018;40(2):154–162. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2017-2239. Epub 2017 Oct 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The dimensional structure of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been extensively debated, but the literature is still inconclusive and contains gaps that require attention. This article sheds light on hitherto unvisited methodological issues, reappraising several key models advanced for the DSM-IV-based civilian version of the PTSD Checklist (PCL-C) as to their configural and metric structures.

METHODS

The sample comprised 456 women, interviewed at 6-8 weeks postpartum, who attended a high-complexity facility in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory structural equation models (ESEM) were used to evaluate the dimensional structure of the PCL-C.

RESULTS

The original three-factor solution was rejected, along with the four-factor structures most widely endorsed in the literature (PTSD-dysphoria and PTSD-numbing models). Further exploration supported a model comprised of two factors (re-experience/avoidance and numbing/hyperarousal).

CONCLUSION

These findings are at odds with the dimensional structure proposed in both DSM-IV and DSM-5. This also entails a different presumption regarding the latent structure of PTSD and how the PCL should be operationalized.

摘要

目的

创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的维度结构一直存在广泛争议,但文献仍不明确,存在需要关注的空白。本文揭示了迄今未被涉及的方法学问题,重新评估了为基于 DSM-IV 的平民版 PTSD 检查表(PCL-C)提出的几个关键模型,以评估其组态和度量结构。

方法

该样本包括 456 名女性,在巴西里约热内卢的一家高复杂度机构接受了产后 6-8 周的访谈。采用验证性因子分析(CFA)和探索性结构方程模型(ESEM)来评估 PCL-C 的维度结构。

结果

最初的三因素解决方案以及文献中最广泛认可的四因素结构(PTSD 烦躁不安和 PTSD 麻木模型)被拒绝。进一步的探索支持了一个由两个因素(再体验/回避和麻木/过度警觉)组成的模型。

结论

这些发现与 DSM-IV 和 DSM-5 提出的维度结构不一致。这也意味着对 PTSD 的潜在结构以及 PCL 的操作化方式有不同的假设。

相似文献

1
Reappraising the dimensional structure of the PTSD Checklist: lessons from the DSM-IV-based PCL-C.
Braz J Psychiatry. 2018;40(2):154–162. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2017-2239. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
3
Validity of the posttraumatic stress disorders (PTSD) checklist in pregnant women.
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 May 12;17(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1304-4.
4
Dimensional structure of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress symptoms: support for a hybrid Anhedonia and Externalizing Behaviors model.
J Psychiatr Res. 2015 Feb;61:106-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.10.012. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
8
Portuguese version of the PTSD Checklist-Military Version (PCL-M)-I: Confirmatory Factor Analysis and reliability.
Psychiatry Res. 2015 Mar 30;226(1):53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.11.055. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
10
Diagnostic utility and factor structure of the PTSD Checklist in older adults.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2012 Oct;24(10):1684-96. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212000853. Epub 2012 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Psychological Distress and Unhealthy Lifestyle in Angina with Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries: A Cross-Sectional Study.
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Aug 21;18:5113-5124. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S540495. eCollection 2025.
5
Underlying Role of Rumination-Mediated Attachment Style Plays in PTSD after TIA and Stroke.
Brain Sci. 2022 Aug 23;12(9):1118. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12091118.
8
Mental distress and its associations with behavioral outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national survey of Chinese adults.
Public Health. 2021 Sep;198:315-323. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.07.034. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
9
Elucidating posttraumatic stress symptom dimensions and health correlates among postpartum women.
J Affect Disord. 2021 Nov 1;294:314-321. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.025. Epub 2021 Jul 18.

本文引用的文献

2
The underlying dimensionality of PTSD in the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: where are we going?
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2015 May 19;6:28074. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v6.28074. eCollection 2015.
3
5
Prevalence and risk factors of postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder: a meta-analysis.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2014 Jul;34(5):389-401. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 May 27.
6
Cumulative traumas and risk thresholds: 12-month PTSD in the World Mental Health (WMH) surveys.
Depress Anxiety. 2014 Feb;31(2):130-42. doi: 10.1002/da.22169. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
7
Factor structure of PTSD symptoms in opioid-dependent patients rating their overall trauma history.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013 Oct 1;132(3):597-602. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.04.009. Epub 2013 May 3.
9
The PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version: reliability, validity, and factor structure in a nonclinical sample.
J Clin Psychol. 2012 Jun;68(6):699-713. doi: 10.1002/jclp.21845. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
10
The factor structure of traumatic stress in parents of children with cancer: a longitudinal analysis*.
J Pediatr Psychol. 2012 May;37(4):448-57. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsr105. Epub 2011 Dec 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验