Suppr超能文献

性别差异对糖尿病治疗质量的影响:生物学和文化因素可能对不同的结果有不同的作用:来自 AMD 期刊倡议的一项横断面观察性研究。

Sex disparities in the quality of diabetes care: biological and cultural factors may play a different role for different outcomes: a cross-sectional observational study from the AMD Annals initiative.

机构信息

Corresponding author: Maria Chiara Rossi,

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2013 Oct;36(10):3162-8. doi: 10.2337/dc13-0184. Epub 2013 Jul 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the quality of type 2 diabetes care according to sex.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Clinical data collected during the year 2009 were extracted from electronic medical records; quality-of-care indicators were evaluated. Multilevel logistic regression analysis was applied to estimate the likelihood of women versus men to be monitored for selected parameters, to reach clinical outcomes, and to be treated with specific classes of drugs. The intercenter variability in the proportion of men and women achieving the targets was also investigated.

RESULTS

Overall, 415,294 patients from 236 diabetes outpatient centers were evaluated, of whom 188,125 (45.3%) were women and 227,169 (54.7%) were men. Women were 14% more likely than men to have HbA1c>9.0% in spite of insulin treatment (odds ratio 1.14 [95% CI 1.10-1.17]), 42% more likely to have LDL cholesterol (LDL-C)≥130 mg/dL (1.42 [1.38-1.46]) in spite of lipid-lowering treatment, and 50% more likely to have BMI≥30 kg/m2 (1.50 [1.50-1.54]). Women were less likely to be monitored for foot and eye complications. In 99% of centers, the percentage of men reaching the LDL-C target was higher than in women, the proportion of patients reaching the HbA1c target was in favor of men in 80% of the centers, and no differences emerged for blood pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

Women show a poorer quality of diabetes care than men. The attainment of the LDL-C target seems to be mainly related to pathophysiological factors, whereas patient and physician attitudes can play an important role in other process measures and outcomes.

摘要

目的

根据性别调查 2 型糖尿病护理质量。

研究设计和方法

从电子病历中提取 2009 年收集的临床数据;评估了护理质量指标。应用多水平逻辑回归分析估计女性与男性相比,监测选定参数、达到临床结果以及接受特定类别的药物治疗的可能性。还研究了各中心达到目标的男性和女性比例的变异性。

结果

共有 236 个糖尿病门诊中心的 415294 名患者接受了评估,其中 188125 名(45.3%)为女性,227169 名(54.7%)为男性。尽管接受了胰岛素治疗,但女性的 HbA1c>9.0%的可能性比男性高 14%(比值比 1.14[95%CI 1.10-1.17]),尽管进行了降脂治疗,但 LDL 胆固醇(LDL-C)≥130mg/dL 的可能性高 42%(1.42[1.38-1.46]),BMI≥30kg/m2 的可能性高 50%(1.50[1.50-1.54])。女性接受足部和眼部并发症监测的可能性较低。在 99%的中心,达到 LDL-C 目标的男性比例高于女性,80%的中心达到 HbA1c 目标的患者比例有利于男性,而血压则没有差异。

结论

女性的糖尿病护理质量比男性差。达到 LDL-C 目标似乎主要与病理生理因素有关,而患者和医生的态度在其他过程措施和结果中可能发挥重要作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80b3/3781503/bcca572f1a03/3162fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验