SRI International, Johns Hopkins Center for the Prevention of Youth Violence, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, United States.
J Sch Psychol. 2013 Aug;51(4):469-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 May 30.
Research suggests that students who bully may perceive the school climate less favorably. Person-centered analyses were used to identify distinct groupings of bullying behaviors and related social-emotional factors (i.e., victimization, internalizing, and perception of school and bullying climate). Latent class analyses were conducted on a sample of 10,254 middle and 2509 high school students and indicated four classes in middle school (Low Involvement, Verbal, High Physical/High Verbal, and High Involvement) and three classes in high school (Low Involvement, Verbal, and High Involvement). A Low Involvement bullying class characterized most students and was related to positive adjustment, whereas a High Involvement bullying class represented the smallest proportion of the sample (1.6% middle school and 7.3% in high school). Students in the High Involvement class reported increased victimization and internalizing problems, feeling less safe and less belonging, and perceiving the school climate to be more supportive of bullying (i.e., perceiving adults' prevention and intervention efforts as ineffective). In middle school, the High Physical/High Verbal class reported significantly higher levels of victimization as compared to the Verbal class. Findings highlight heterogeneity in bullying behaviors and underscore the importance of prevention and intervention programming that addresses safety and belonging.
研究表明,欺凌者可能对学校氛围的评价较低。采用以人为中心的分析方法,确定了欺凌行为和相关社会情感因素(即受害、内化以及对学校和欺凌氛围的感知)的不同分组。对 10254 名中学生和 2509 名高中生的样本进行了潜在类别分析,结果表明在中学中有四个类别(低度参与、言语、高身体/高言语和高度参与),在高中中有三个类别(低度参与、言语和高度参与)。大多数学生属于低度参与欺凌类,与积极调整有关,而高度参与欺凌类在样本中所占比例最小(中学为 1.6%,高中为 7.3%)。高度参与类的学生报告说受害和内化问题增加,感到不太安全和归属感,并且认为学校氛围更支持欺凌行为(即,认为成年人的预防和干预措施无效)。在中学中,高身体/高言语类与言语类相比,报告的受害程度明显更高。研究结果突出了欺凌行为的异质性,并强调了需要制定预防和干预计划,以解决安全和归属感问题。