• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The challenge of causal inference in gene-environment interaction research: leveraging research designs from the social sciences.基因-环境交互作用研究中因果推断的挑战:利用社会科学的研究设计。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Oct;103 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S42-5. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301290. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
2
Critical need for family-based, quasi-experimental designs in integrating genetic and social science research.迫切需要基于家庭的准实验设计来整合遗传和社会科学研究。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Oct;103 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S46-55. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301252. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
3
The past, present, and future of experimental methods in the social sciences.社会科学实验方法的过去、现在和未来。
Soc Sci Res. 2022 Nov;108:102799. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102799. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
4
Lab experiments are a major source of knowledge in the social sciences.实验室实验是社会科学知识的主要来源。
Science. 2009 Oct 23;326(5952):535-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1168244.
5
Qualitative Study定性研究
6
Integrating work from genetics and the social sciences: an introduction.整合遗传学与社会科学的研究成果:引言
Biodemography Soc Biol. 2013;59(1):1-3. doi: 10.1080/19485565.2013.774630.
7
Conceptual shifts needed to understand the dynamic interactions of genes, environment, epigenetics, social processes, and behavioral choices.需要转变观念,以理解基因、环境、表观遗传学、社会过程和行为选择之间的动态相互作用。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Oct;103 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S33-42. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301221. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
8
The Russo-Williamson Theses in the social sciences: causal inference drawing on two types of evidence.社会科学中的鲁索 - 威廉姆森命题:基于两种证据的因果推断。
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2012 Dec;43(4):806-13. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 Jun 23.
9
Population heterogeneity and causal inference.人群异质性与因果推断。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 16;110(16):6262-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1303102110. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
10
Remarks on the analysis of causal relationships in population research.关于人群研究中因果关系分析的评论
Demography. 2005 Feb;42(1):91-108. doi: 10.1353/dem.2005.0006.

引用本文的文献

1
PIGEON: a statistical framework for estimating gene-environment interaction for polygenic traits.PIGEON:一种用于估计多基因性状基因-环境相互作用的统计框架。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 May 23. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02202-9.
2
Interaction of family SES with children's genetic propensity for cognitive and noncognitive skills: No evidence of the Scarr-Rowe hypothesis for educational outcomes.家庭社会经济地位与儿童认知和非认知技能的遗传倾向之间的相互作用:没有证据支持斯卡尔-罗假设对教育成果的影响。
Res Soc Stratif Mobil. 2024 Aug;92:100960. doi: 10.1016/j.rssm.2024.100960.
3
Many roads to a gene-environment interaction.通往基因-环境相互作用的多种途径。
Am J Hum Genet. 2024 Apr 4;111(4):626-635. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.03.002.
4
Decoupling genetics from attainments: The role of social environments.从成就中分离遗传因素:社会环境的作用。
Econ Hum Biol. 2023 Aug;50:101259. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2023.101259. Epub 2023 May 17.
5
Ubiquitous bias and false discovery due to model misspecification in analysis of statistical interactions: The role of the outcome's distribution and metric properties.统计交互作用分析中因模型设定错误导致的普遍偏差和错误发现:结果分布和度量属性的作用。
Psychol Methods. 2024 Dec;29(6):1164-1179. doi: 10.1037/met0000532. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
6
Developmental behavioral genetics research on school achievement is missing vulnerable children, to our detriment.发展行为遗传学对学业成就的研究忽略了弱势儿童,这对我们不利。
New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2022 Jul;2022(183-184):47-55. doi: 10.1002/cad.20485. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
7
Interactions between Polygenic Scores and Environments: Methodological and Conceptual Challenges.多基因分数与环境之间的相互作用:方法学和概念上的挑战。
Sociol Sci. 2020 Sep;7:465-486. doi: 10.15195/v7.a19. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
8
Gene-by-peer-environment interaction effects on cigarette, alcohol, and marijuana use among US high school students of European Ancestry.基因-同伴-环境相互作用对有欧洲血统的美国高中生吸烟、饮酒和使用大麻的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Sep;309:115249. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115249. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
9
Gene-environment Interactions and School Tracking during Secondary Education: Evidence from the U.S.中学教育阶段的基因-环境相互作用与学校分层:来自美国的证据
Res Soc Stratif Mobil. 2021 Dec;76. doi: 10.1016/j.rssm.2021.100628. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
10
Gene-environment dependencies lead to collider bias in models with polygenic scores.基因-环境的相互作用导致基于多基因评分模型中的混杂偏倚。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 4;11(1):9457. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89020-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetic interactions with prenatal social environment: effects on academic and behavioral outcomes.遗传与产前社会环境的相互作用:对学业和行为结果的影响。
J Health Soc Behav. 2013 Mar;54(1):109-27. doi: 10.1177/0022146512473758.
2
Why have tobacco control policies stalled? Using genetic moderation to examine policy impacts.为什么烟草控制政策停滞不前?利用遗传缓和来检验政策的影响。
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e50576. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050576. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
3
Genetic lotteries within families.家庭内的遗传彩票。
J Health Econ. 2011 Jul;30(4):647-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.04.005. Epub 2011 May 17.
4
The promise and pitfalls of combining genetic and economic research.基因研究与经济研究相结合的前景与陷阱
Health Econ. 2011 Aug;20(8):889-92. doi: 10.1002/hec.1745. Epub 2011 May 24.
5
The minimum legal drinking age and public health.最低法定饮酒年龄与公共健康。
J Econ Perspect. 2011 Spring;25(2):133-56. doi: 10.1257/jep.25.2.133.
6
The serotonin transporter promoter variant (5-HTTLPR), stress, and depression meta-analysis revisited: evidence of genetic moderation.血清素转运体启动子变体(5-HTTLPR)、压力与抑郁的元分析再探讨:基因调节的证据
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011 May;68(5):444-54. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.189. Epub 2011 Jan 3.
7
New approaches to population stratification in genome-wide association studies.全基因组关联研究中群体分层的新方法。
Nat Rev Genet. 2010 Jul;11(7):459-63. doi: 10.1038/nrg2813.
8
Missing heritability and strategies for finding the underlying causes of complex disease.复杂疾病遗传率缺失及其潜在病因的研究策略。
Nat Rev Genet. 2010 Jun;11(6):446-50. doi: 10.1038/nrg2809.
9
The promise and challenges of incorporating genetic data into longitudinal social science surveys and research.将基因数据纳入纵向社会科学调查与研究的前景与挑战。
Biodemography Soc Biol. 2009;55(2):238-51. doi: 10.1080/19485560903415807.
10
The dopamine transporter gene, a spectrum of most common risky behaviors, and the legal status of the behaviors.多巴胺转运体基因、一系列最常见的高风险行为,以及这些行为的法律地位。
PLoS One. 2010 Feb 22;5(2):e9352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009352.

基因-环境交互作用研究中因果推断的挑战:利用社会科学的研究设计。

The challenge of causal inference in gene-environment interaction research: leveraging research designs from the social sciences.

机构信息

At the time of this study, Jason M. Fletcher was with the Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Health & Society Scholar, Columbia University, New York, NY. Dalton Conley was with the Department of Sociology, the School of Medicine, and the Wagner School of Public Service at New York University, New York.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2013 Oct;103 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S42-5. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301290. Epub 2013 Aug 8.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301290
PMID:23927518
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3786757/
Abstract

The integration of genetics and the social sciences will lead to a more complex understanding of the articulation between social and biological processes, although the empirical difficulties inherent in this integration are large. One key challenge is the implications of moving "outside the lab" and away from the experimental tools available for research with model organisms. Social science research methods used to examine human behavior in nonexperimental, real-world settings to date have not been fully taken advantage of during this disciplinary integration, especially in the form of gene-environment interaction research. This article outlines and provides examples of several prominent research designs that should be used in gene-environment research and highlights a key benefit to geneticists of working with social scientists.

摘要

遗传学与社会科学的融合将导致对社会与生物过程之间的相互关系有更复杂的理解,尽管这种融合所固有的经验困难很大。一个关键挑战是,从“实验室之外”以及从用于对模式生物进行研究的实验工具出发,将会产生怎样的影响。在这种学科融合中,迄今为止,在非实验、真实环境中研究人类行为的社会科学研究方法尚未得到充分利用,尤其是在基因-环境相互作用研究的形式中。本文概述了应在基因-环境研究中使用的几种重要研究设计,并举例说明,同时还强调了遗传学家与社会科学家合作的一个关键好处。