• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

句子理解中语义和句法干扰的神经基础。

Neural basis of semantic and syntactic interference in sentence comprehension.

机构信息

University of Michigan, Department of Psychiatry and Addiction Research Center, 4250 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.

出版信息

Brain Lang. 2013 Sep;126(3):314-26. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Aug 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.bandl.2013.06.006
PMID:23933471
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3816580/
Abstract

According to the cue-based parsing approach (Lewis, Vasishth, & Van Dyke, 2006), sentence comprehension difficulty derives from interference from material that partially matches syntactic and semantic retrieval cues. In a 2 (low vs. high semantic interference)×2 (low vs. high syntactic interference) fMRI study, greater activation was observed in left BA44/45 for high versus low syntactic interference conditions following sentences and in left BA45/47 for high versus low semantic interference conditions following comprehension questions. A conjunction analysis showed BA45 associated with both types of interference, while BA47 was associated with only semantic interference. Greater activation was also observed in the left STG in the high interference conditions. Importantly, the results for the LIFG could not be attributed to greater working memory capacity demands for high interference conditions. The results favor a fractionation of the LIFG wherein BA45 is associated with post-retrieval selection and BA47 with controlled retrieval of semantic information.

摘要

根据基于提示的解析方法(Lewis、Vasishth 和 Van Dyke,2006),句子理解的难度源于与句法和语义检索提示部分匹配的材料的干扰。在一项 2(低语义干扰与高语义干扰)×2(低句法干扰与高句法干扰)的 fMRI 研究中,在句子后观察到左侧 BA44/45 在高句法干扰条件下比低句法干扰条件下的激活更大,在理解问题后,在左侧 BA45/47 中观察到高语义干扰条件下比低语义干扰条件下的激活更大。联合分析显示 BA45 与两种干扰类型相关,而 BA47 仅与语义干扰相关。在高干扰条件下,左侧 STG 也观察到了更大的激活。重要的是,左 LIFG 的结果不能归因于高干扰条件下对工作记忆容量的更高需求。结果支持 LIFG 的细分,其中 BA45 与检索后选择相关,BA47 与语义信息的受控检索相关。

相似文献

1
Neural basis of semantic and syntactic interference in sentence comprehension.句子理解中语义和句法干扰的神经基础。
Brain Lang. 2013 Sep;126(3):314-26. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
2
Neural correlates of semantic-driven syntactic parsing in sentence comprehension.句子理解中语义驱动句法分析的神经关联
Neuroimage. 2024 Apr 1;289:120543. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120543. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
3
Neural segregation in left inferior frontal gyrus of semantic processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy.语义加工在不同句法层级上于左侧额下回的神经分离。
Neuropsychologia. 2022 Jul 4;171:108254. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108254. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
4
The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: localizing syntactic and semantic processes.左额下回和颞上回在句子理解中的作用:句法和语义加工的定位
Cereb Cortex. 2003 Feb;13(2):170-7. doi: 10.1093/cercor/13.2.170.
5
Neural aspects of sentence comprehension: syntactic complexity, reversibility, and reanalysis.句子理解的神经基础:句法复杂性、可逆性和再分析。
Cereb Cortex. 2010 Aug;20(8):1853-64. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp249. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
6
Preschoolers' brains rely on semantic cues prior to the mastery of syntax during sentence comprehension.学龄前儿童的大脑在句子理解过程中,在掌握句法之前依赖语义线索。
Neuroimage. 2016 Feb 1;126:256-66. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.036. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
7
Retrieval and unification of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: an FMRI study using word-category ambiguity.句子理解中句法结构的提取与整合:一项使用词类歧义的功能磁共振成像研究。
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Jul;19(7):1493-503. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn187. Epub 2008 Nov 10.
8
The role of domain-general frontal systems in language comprehension: evidence from dual-task interference and semantic ambiguity.领域一般性额前系统在语言理解中的作用:来自双重任务干扰和语义模糊性的证据。
Brain Lang. 2010 Dec;115(3):182-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.07.005. Epub 2010 Aug 14.
9
Verbal short-term memory capacities and executive function in semantic and syntactic interference resolution during sentence comprehension: Evidence from aphasia.言语短期记忆容量和执行功能在句子理解中的语义和句法干扰解决中的作用:来自失语症的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 May;113:111-125. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
10
The role of left temporo-parietal and inferior frontal cortex in comprehending syntactically complex sentences: A brain stimulation study.左颞顶叶和额下回皮质在理解句法复杂句子中的作用:一项脑刺激研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2023 Feb 10;180:108465. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108465. Epub 2022 Dec 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Verbal working memory and syntactic comprehension segregate into the dorsal and ventral streams, respectively.言语工作记忆和句法理解分别定位于背侧流和腹侧流。
Brain Commun. 2024 Dec 11;6(6):fcae449. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae449. eCollection 2024.
2
The role of variation in phonological and semantic working memory capacities in sentence comprehension: neural evidence from healthy and brain-damaged individuals.语音和语义工作记忆容量的变化在句子理解中的作用:来自健康个体和脑损伤个体的神经学证据。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Feb;25(1):240-262. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01217-5. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
3
Shared functional specialization in transformer-based language models and the human brain.基于变压器的语言模型和人类大脑的功能专业化共享。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jun 29;15(1):5523. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49173-5.
4
Neural underpinnings of processing combinatorial unstated meaning and the influence of individual cognitive style.组合未明意义加工的神经基础和个体认知风格的影响。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Sep 9;33(18):10013-10027. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad261.
5
Robust Effects of Working Memory Demand during Naturalistic Language Comprehension in Language-Selective Cortex.自然语言理解过程中工作记忆需求对语言选择皮层的强大影响。
J Neurosci. 2022 Sep 28;42(39):7412-7430. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1894-21.2022.
6
Distinct spatiotemporal patterns of syntactic and semantic processing in human inferior frontal gyrus.人类下额叶中句法和语义处理的独特时空模式。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Aug;6(8):1104-1111. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01334-6. Epub 2022 May 26.
7
Interference patterns in subject-verb agreement and reflexives revisited: A large-sample study.主谓一致和反身代词中的干扰模式再探讨:一项大样本研究。
J Mem Lang. 2020 Apr;111. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2019.104063. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
8
Lack of selectivity for syntax relative to word meanings throughout the language network.在整个语言网络中,相对于词义而言,对句法缺乏选择性。
Cognition. 2020 Oct;203:104348. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104348. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
9
Verbal Working Memory as Emergent from Language Comprehension and Production.作为从语言理解和产出中浮现的言语工作记忆。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Mar 12;14:68. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00068. eCollection 2020.
10
Age Differences in Encoding-Related Alpha Power Reflect Sentence Comprehension Difficulties.编码相关的阿尔法波功率的年龄差异反映了句子理解困难。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2019 Jul 17;11:183. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00183. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data.识别记忆的全局匹配模型:模型如何匹配数据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Mar;3(1):37-60. doi: 10.3758/BF03210740.
2
Memory Interference as a Determinant of Language Comprehension.作为语言理解决定因素的记忆干扰
Lang Linguist Compass. 2012 Apr 1;6(4):193-211. doi: 10.1002/lnc3.330. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
3
The cortical language circuit: from auditory perception to sentence comprehension.皮质语言回路:从听觉感知到句子理解。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 May;16(5):262-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.001. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
4
Parametric effects of syntactic-semantic conflict in Broca's area during sentence processing.布罗卡区在句子处理过程中句法-语义冲突的参数效应。
Brain Lang. 2012 Mar;120(3):259-64. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.12.004. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
5
The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function.语言处理的大脑基础:从结构到功能。
Physiol Rev. 2011 Oct;91(4):1357-92. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00006.2011.
6
Cue-dependent interference in comprehension.理解中的线索依赖干扰。
J Mem Lang. 2011 Oct 1;65(3):247-263. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.05.002.
7
An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval.基于激活的句子处理模型是一种熟练的记忆检索。
Cogn Sci. 2005 May 6;29(3):375-419. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_25.
8
A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory.一种再认记忆模型:REM-有效地从记忆中提取。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1997 Jun;4(2):145-66. doi: 10.3758/BF03209391.
9
LIFG-based attentional control and the resolution of lexical ambiguities in sentence context.基于 LIFG 的注意控制与句子语境中词汇歧义的消解。
Brain Lang. 2011 Jan;116(1):22-32. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.09.012. Epub 2010 Oct 23.
10
Prominence vs. aboutness in sequencing: a functional distinction within the left inferior frontal gyrus.序列突显与序列指涉:左下回额下回的功能区分
Brain Lang. 2012 Feb;120(2):96-107. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.06.004. Epub 2010 Jul 23.