Department of Psychology, University of New Orleans, Louisiana, United States.
Brain Cogn. 2013 Nov;83(2):234-43. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.07.012. Epub 2013 Sep 8.
The canonical AX-CPT task measures two forms of cognitive control: sustained goal-oriented control ("proactive" control) and transient changes in cognitive control following unexpected events ("reactive" control). We modified this task by adding negative and neutral International Affective Picture System (IAPS) pictures to assess the effects of negative emotion on these two forms of cognitive control. Proactive and reactive control styles were assessed based on measures of behavior and electrophysiology, including the N2 event-related potential component and source space activation (Low Resolution Tomography [LORETA]). We found slower reaction-times and greater DLPFC activation for negative relative to neutral stimuli. Additionally, we found that a proactive style of responding was related to less prefrontal activation (interpreted to reflect increased efficiency of processing) during actively maintained previously cued information and that a reactive style of responding was related to less prefrontal activation (interpreted to reflect increased efficiency of processing) during just-in-time environmentally triggered information. This pattern of results was evident in relatively neutral contexts, but in the face of negative emotion, these associations were not found, suggesting potential response style-by-emotion interaction effects on prefrontal neural activation.
经典的 AX-CPT 任务衡量了两种认知控制形式:持续的目标导向控制(“前摄”控制)和意外事件后认知控制的瞬时变化(“反应”控制)。我们通过添加负面和中性的国际情感图片系统(IAPS)图片来修改这个任务,以评估负面情绪对这两种认知控制形式的影响。基于行为和电生理测量,包括 N2 事件相关电位成分和源空间激活(低分辨率断层扫描 [LORETA]),评估了前摄和反应控制风格。我们发现,与中性刺激相比,负性刺激的反应时间更慢,DLPFC 激活更大。此外,我们发现,在主动保持先前提示的信息时,前摄反应风格与前额叶激活减少有关(解释为处理效率提高),而在及时的环境触发信息时,反应反应风格与前额叶激活减少有关(解释为处理效率提高)。这种结果模式在相对中性的环境中是明显的,但在面对负面情绪时,这些关联没有被发现,这表明在额前神经激活方面,潜在的反应风格与情绪之间存在交互作用。