Suppr超能文献

拓展对转化研究项目的评估:用价值判断补充指标

Expanding assessments of translational research programs: supplementing metrics with value judgments.

作者信息

Scott Craig S, Nagasawa Pamela R, Abernethy Neil F, Ramsey Bonnie W, Martin Paul J, Hacker Beth M, Schwartz Havivah D, Brock Douglas M, Robins Lynn S, Wolf Fred M, Carter-Dubois Marie, Disis Mary L

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Eval Health Prof. 2014 Mar;37(1):83-97. doi: 10.1177/0163278713500984. Epub 2013 Sep 23.

Abstract

The University of Washington (UW) Institute for Translational Health Sciences (ITHS), funded by a Clinical and Translational Sciences Award program, has supplemented its initial Kellogg Logic Model-based program evaluation with the eight judgment-based evaluative elements of the World Health Organization's (WHO) Health Services Assessment Model. This article describes the relationship between the two models, the rationale for the decision to supplement the evaluation with WHO evaluative elements, the value-added results of the WHO evaluative elements, and plans for further developing the WHO assessments.

摘要

华盛顿大学(UW)转化健康科学研究所(ITHS)由临床与转化科学奖计划资助,它在世卫组织(WHO)卫生服务评估模型的八项基于判断的评估要素基础上,对其最初基于凯洛格逻辑模型的项目评估进行了补充。本文描述了这两种模型之间的关系、决定用世卫组织评估要素补充评估的理由、世卫组织评估要素带来的增值结果,以及进一步开展世卫组织评估的计划。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd66/4012871/082de333cd05/10.1177_0163278713500984-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验