• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

拓展对转化研究项目的评估:用价值判断补充指标

Expanding assessments of translational research programs: supplementing metrics with value judgments.

作者信息

Scott Craig S, Nagasawa Pamela R, Abernethy Neil F, Ramsey Bonnie W, Martin Paul J, Hacker Beth M, Schwartz Havivah D, Brock Douglas M, Robins Lynn S, Wolf Fred M, Carter-Dubois Marie, Disis Mary L

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Eval Health Prof. 2014 Mar;37(1):83-97. doi: 10.1177/0163278713500984. Epub 2013 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1177/0163278713500984
PMID:24064429
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4012871/
Abstract

The University of Washington (UW) Institute for Translational Health Sciences (ITHS), funded by a Clinical and Translational Sciences Award program, has supplemented its initial Kellogg Logic Model-based program evaluation with the eight judgment-based evaluative elements of the World Health Organization's (WHO) Health Services Assessment Model. This article describes the relationship between the two models, the rationale for the decision to supplement the evaluation with WHO evaluative elements, the value-added results of the WHO evaluative elements, and plans for further developing the WHO assessments.

摘要

华盛顿大学(UW)转化健康科学研究所(ITHS)由临床与转化科学奖计划资助,它在世卫组织(WHO)卫生服务评估模型的八项基于判断的评估要素基础上,对其最初基于凯洛格逻辑模型的项目评估进行了补充。本文描述了这两种模型之间的关系、决定用世卫组织评估要素补充评估的理由、世卫组织评估要素带来的增值结果,以及进一步开展世卫组织评估的计划。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd66/4012871/05505fcfbc36/10.1177_0163278713500984-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd66/4012871/082de333cd05/10.1177_0163278713500984-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd66/4012871/ea198cb9bfc1/10.1177_0163278713500984-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd66/4012871/05505fcfbc36/10.1177_0163278713500984-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd66/4012871/082de333cd05/10.1177_0163278713500984-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd66/4012871/ea198cb9bfc1/10.1177_0163278713500984-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd66/4012871/05505fcfbc36/10.1177_0163278713500984-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Expanding assessments of translational research programs: supplementing metrics with value judgments.拓展对转化研究项目的评估:用价值判断补充指标
Eval Health Prof. 2014 Mar;37(1):83-97. doi: 10.1177/0163278713500984. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
2
Common metrics to assess the efficiency of clinical research.评估临床研究效率的常用指标。
Eval Health Prof. 2013 Dec;36(4):432-46. doi: 10.1177/0163278713499586. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
3
Methods for identifying translational researchers.识别转化医学研究人员的方法。
Eval Health Prof. 2014 Mar;37(1):3-18. doi: 10.1177/0163278713504583. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
4
Accrual and recruitment practices at Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) institutions: a call for expectations, expertise, and evaluation.临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)机构的积累和招募实践:呼吁期望、专业知识和评估。
Acad Med. 2014 Aug;89(8):1180-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000308.
5
The translational research impact scale: development, construct validity, and reliability testing.转化研究影响量表:开发、结构效度和信度测试。
Eval Health Prof. 2014 Mar;37(1):50-70. doi: 10.1177/0163278713506112. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
6
Success case studies contribute to evaluation of complex research infrastructure.成功案例研究有助于对复杂研究基础设施进行评估。
Eval Health Prof. 2014 Mar;37(1):98-113. doi: 10.1177/0163278713500140. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
7
Heterogeneity at work: implications of the 2012 Clinical Translational Science Award evaluators survey.工作中的异质性:2012 年临床转化科学奖评估者调查的启示。
Eval Health Prof. 2013 Dec;36(4):447-63. doi: 10.1177/0163278713510378.
8
Research subject advocacy: program implementation and evaluation at clinical and translational science award centers.研究主题倡导:临床和转化科学奖中心的项目实施和评估。
Acad Med. 2012 Sep;87(9):1228-36. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182628afa.
9
The quantitative evaluation of the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) program based on science mapping and scientometric analysis.基于科学图谱和科学计量分析的临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)项目的定量评估。
Clin Transl Sci. 2013 Dec;6(6):452-7. doi: 10.1111/cts.12078. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
10
Knowledge Translation: Where Are the Qualitative Health Researchers?知识转化:定性健康研究人员何在?
Qual Health Res. 2015 Nov;25(11):1461-2. doi: 10.1177/1049732315611266.

引用本文的文献

1
Design of a Multidisciplinary Training Program in Complementary and Integrative Health Clinical Research: Building Research Across Interdisciplinary Gaps.补充与整合健康临床研究多学科培训项目的设计:跨越跨学科差距开展研究
J Altern Complement Med. 2019 May;25(5):509-516. doi: 10.1089/acm.2018.0454. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
2
Trust in Community-Engaged Research Partnerships: A Methodological Overview of Designing a Multisite Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Initiative.对社区参与研究伙伴关系的信任:设计多中心临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)计划的方法概述
Eval Health Prof. 2020 Sep;43(3):180-192. doi: 10.1177/0163278718819719. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Role for CTSAs in leveraging a distributed research infrastructure to engage diverse stakeholders in emergent research policy development.CTSA 在利用分布式研究基础设施吸引不同利益相关者参与新兴研究政策制定方面的作用。
Clin Transl Sci. 2013 Feb;6(1):57-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2012.00444.x. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
2
Clinical and translational scientist career success: metrics for evaluation.临床和转化科学家职业成功:评估指标。
Clin Transl Sci. 2012 Oct;5(5):400-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2012.00422.x. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
3
Evidence of community structure in biomedical research grant collaborations.
The Current Trend of the Translational Research Paradigm.
转化研究范式的当前趋势。
Cureus. 2018 Mar 19;10(3):e2340. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2340.
4
Feasibility of common bibliometrics in evaluating translational science.常用文献计量学在评估转化医学科研中的可行性
J Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Feb;1(1):45-52. doi: 10.1017/cts.2016.8. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
5
Measuring research impact in Australia's medical research institutes: a scoping literature review of the objectives for and an assessment of the capabilities of research impact assessment frameworks.衡量澳大利亚医学研究机构的研究影响力:对研究影响力评估框架目标的范围界定文献综述及能力评估
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Mar 21;15(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0180-1.
6
Multi-Dimensional Impact of the Public-Private Center for Translational Molecular Medicine (CTMM) in the Netherlands: Understanding New 21(st) Century Institutional Designs to Support Innovation-in-Society.荷兰公私合营转化分子医学中心(CTMM)的多维度影响:理解支持社会创新的21世纪新制度设计
OMICS. 2016 May;20(5):265-73. doi: 10.1089/omi.2016.0042.
7
Evolution of Multidisciplinary Translational Teams (MTTs): Insights for Accelerating Translational Innovations.多学科转化团队(MTTs)的发展:加速转化创新的见解
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Oct;8(5):542-52. doi: 10.1111/cts.12266. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
8
Social network analysis to assess the impact of the CTSA on biomedical research grant collaboration.运用社交网络分析评估临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)对生物医学研究资助合作的影响。
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Apr;8(2):150-4. doi: 10.1111/cts.12247. Epub 2014 Nov 30.
生物医学研究资助合作中的社区结构证据。
J Biomed Inform. 2013 Feb;46(1):40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
4
Evaluating and giving feedback to mentors: new evidence-based approaches.评估和反馈导师:新的循证方法。
Clin Transl Sci. 2012 Feb;5(1):71-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00361.x. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
5
Temporal evolution of biomedical research grant collaborations across multiple scales--a CTSA baseline study.跨多尺度生物医学研究资助合作的时间演变——一项临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)基线研究
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011;2011:987-93. Epub 2011 Oct 22.
6
Implementation of a deidentified federated data network for population-based cohort discovery.实现基于人群队列发现的去标识联邦数据网络。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jun;19(e1):e60-7. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000133. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
7
A partnership approach for Electronic Data Capture in small-scale clinical trials.一种小规模临床试验中电子数据采集的合作方法。
J Biomed Inform. 2011 Dec;44 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S103-S108. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.05.008. Epub 2011 May 30.
8
Integrating economic evaluation methods into clinical and translational science award consortium comparative effectiveness educational goals.将经济评价方法融入临床和转化科学奖联盟比较效果教育目标。
Acad Med. 2011 Jun;86(6):701-5. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318217cf25.
9
Evaluation metrics for biostatistical and epidemiological collaborations.生物统计学和流行病学合作的评价指标。
Stat Med. 2011 Oct 15;30(23):2767-77. doi: 10.1002/sim.4184. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
10
Serving the enterprise and beyond with informatics for integrating biology and the bedside (i2b2).以整合生物学与床边护理的信息学服务企业及其他领域 (i2b2)。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Mar-Apr;17(2):124-30. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2009.000893.