• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Much ado about p. What does a p-value mean when testing hypotheses with aggregated cross-cultural data in the field of evolution and human behavior?

作者信息

Pollet Thomas V

机构信息

Department of Social and Organizational Psychology, VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2013 Oct 11;4:734. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00734. eCollection 2013.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00734
PMID:24130545
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3795343/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f115/3795343/16bc338b710e/fpsyg-04-00734-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f115/3795343/16bc338b710e/fpsyg-04-00734-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f115/3795343/16bc338b710e/fpsyg-04-00734-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Much ado about p. What does a p-value mean when testing hypotheses with aggregated cross-cultural data in the field of evolution and human behavior?关于p值的诸多争议。在进化与人类行为领域，使用汇总的跨文化数据进行假设检验时，p值意味着什么？
Front Psychol. 2013 Oct 11;4:734. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00734. eCollection 2013.
2
Towards a unified science of cultural evolution.迈向文化进化的统一科学。
Behav Brain Sci. 2006 Aug;29(4):329-47; discussion 347-83. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X06009083.
3
Test anxiety: a cross-cultural perspective.考试焦虑：跨文化视角
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2005 Mar;8(1):65-88. doi: 10.1007/s10567-005-2342-x.
4
Impact of risk factors, activities and psychological disorders on the health of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in China: a cross-sectional study.中国慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的风险因素、活动和心理障碍对健康的影响：一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jul 2;13:627. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-627.
5
Looking for middle ground in cultural attraction theory.寻找文化吸引理论的中间立场。
Evol Anthropol. 2019 Jan;28(1):14-17. doi: 10.1002/evan.21762. Epub 2019 Jan 20.
6
A worldwide view of matriliny: using cross-cultural analyses to shed light on human kinship systems.从全球视角看母系继嗣：利用跨文化分析揭示人类亲属制度。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Sep 2;374(1780):20180077. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0077. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
7
What Modern Sports Competitions Can Tell Us About Human Nature.现代体育竞赛能告诉我们关于人性的什么
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 Mar;14(2):138-155. doi: 10.1177/1745691618794912. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
8
Testing evolutionary hypotheses about human biological adaptation using cross-cultural comparison.运用跨文化比较来检验关于人类生物适应性的进化假说。
Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2003 Sep;136(1):85-94. doi: 10.1016/s1095-6433(03)00019-9.
9
CROSS-CULTURAL VALIDATION OF THE PORTUGUESE VERSION OF THE EDUCATIONAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT TOOL (PortENAT).教育需求评估工具葡萄牙语版本（PortENAT）的跨文化验证
Acta Reumatol Port. 2015 Jul-Sep;40(3):242-53.
10
A Modeling Approach that Integrates Individual Behavior, Social Networks, and Cross-Cultural Variation.一种整合个体行为、社交网络和跨文化差异的建模方法。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Oct;23(10):818-820. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Multi-level modelling of time-series cross-sectional data reveals the dynamic interaction between ecological threats and democratic development.时间序列横截面数据的多层次建模揭示了生态威胁与民主发展之间的动态相互作用。
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Mar 18;7(3):191804. doi: 10.1098/rsos.191804. eCollection 2020 Mar.
2
Ecology of Freedom: Competitive Tests of the Role of Pathogens, Climate, and Natural Disasters in the Development of Socio-Political Freedom.《自由的生态：病原体、气候和自然灾害在社会政治自由发展中作用的竞争性检验》
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 12;9:954. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00954. eCollection 2018.
3
The potential pitfalls of studying adult sex ratios at aggregate levels in humans.

本文引用的文献

1
Statistical Evidence in Experimental Psychology: An Empirical Comparison Using 855 t Tests.实验心理学中的统计证据：使用 855 个 t 检验的实证比较。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 May;6(3):291-8. doi: 10.1177/1745691611406923.
2
Institutions, parasites and the persistence of in-group preferences.机构、寄生虫与内群体偏好的持久性
PLoS One. 2013 May 21;8(5):e63642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063642. Print 2013.
3
Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: the cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity.
在总体层面研究人类成年性别比的潜在陷阱。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Sep 19;372(1729). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0317.
4
Grounding the data. A response to: Population finiteness is not a concern for null hypothesis significance testing when studying human behavior.为数据奠定基础。对以下内容的回应：在研究人类行为时，总体有限性并非零假设显著性检验需要考虑的问题。
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 6;6:1169. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01169. eCollection 2015.
5
Population finiteness is not a concern for null hypothesis significance testing when studying human behavior. A reply to Pollet (2013).在研究人类行为时，总体有限性并非零假设显著性检验所关注的问题。对波利特（2013年）的回应。
Front Neurosci. 2015 Mar 12;9:81. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00081. eCollection 2015.
6
A re-analysis of the relationship between "parasite stress" and authoritarianism.对“寄生虫压力”与威权主义之间关系的重新分析。
Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 23;5:638. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00638. eCollection 2014.
寄生虫压力促进内群体的社交聚集性：强大家庭关系和宗教信仰增强的案例。
Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Apr;35(2):61-79. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X11000021. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
4
Parasite stress promotes homicide and child maltreatment.寄生虫压力会促使人们实施凶杀和虐待儿童行为。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Dec 12;366(1583):3466-77. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0052.
5
Parasite prevalence and the worldwide distribution of cognitive ability.寄生虫感染率与全球认知能力分布。
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Dec 22;277(1701):3801-8. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0973. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
6
Does infectious disease cause global variation in the frequency of intrastate armed conflict and civil war?传染病是否导致了州内武装冲突和内战发生频率的全球差异？
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2010 Aug;85(3):669-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00133.x. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
7
The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: cross-cultural variation in women's preferences for masculinized male faces.一个国家的健康状况可以预测其伴侣偏好：女性对男性化面孔的偏好存在跨文化差异。
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Aug 7;277(1692):2405-10. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.2184. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
8
A dirty dozen: twelve p-value misconceptions.有害的十二个：十二个p值误解
Semin Hematol. 2008 Jul;45(3):135-40. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2008.04.003.
9
Pathogen prevalence predicts human cross-cultural variability in individualism/collectivism.病原体流行率预示着个人主义/集体主义在人类跨文化中的差异。
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Jun 7;275(1640):1279-85. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0094.
10
Probability as certainty: dichotomous thinking and the misuse of p values.将概率视为确定性：二分法思维与p值的误用
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Dec;13(6):1033-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03213921.