Subic-Wrana Claudia, Beutel Manfred E, Brähler Elmar, Stöbel-Richter Yve, Knebel Achim, Lane Richard D, Wiltink Jörg
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Universal Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Rhinland-Palatinate, Germany.
Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Leipzig, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany.
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 17;9(3):e91846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091846. eCollection 2014.
The Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale (LEAS) as a performance task discriminates between implicit or subconscious and explicit or conscious levels of emotional awareness. An impaired awareness of one's feeling states may influence emotion regulation strategies and self-reports of negative emotions. To determine this influence, we applied the LEAS and self-report measures for emotion regulation strategies and negative affect in a representative sample of the German general population.
A short version of the LEAS, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ), assessing reappraisal and suppression as emotion regulation strategies, were presented to N = 2524 participants of a representative German community study. The questionnaire data were analyzed with regard to the level of emotional awareness.
LEAS scores were independent from depression, but related to self-reported anxiety. Although of small or medium effect size, different correlational patters between emotion regulation strategies and negative affectivity were related to implict and explict levels of emotional awareness. In participants with implicit emotional awareness, suppression was related to higher anxiety and depression, whereas in participants with explicit emotional awareness, in addition to a positive relationship of suppression and depression, we found a negative relationship of reappraisal to depression. These findings were independent of age. In women high use of suppression and little use of reappraisal were more strongly related to negative affect than in men.
Our first findings suggest that conscious awareness of emotions may be a precondition for the use of reappraisal as an adaptive emotion regulation strategy. They encourage further research in the relation between subconsious and conscious emotional awareness and the prefarance of adaptive or maladaptive emotion regulation strategies The correlational trends found in a representative sample of the general population may become more pronounced in clinical samples.
情绪觉察水平量表(LEAS)作为一项表现任务,能够区分情绪觉察的内隐或潜意识水平与外显或意识水平。对自身情绪状态的觉察受损可能会影响情绪调节策略以及负面情绪的自我报告。为了确定这种影响,我们在德国普通人群的代表性样本中应用了LEAS以及情绪调节策略和负面影响的自我报告测量方法。
向德国一项具有代表性的社区研究的N = 2524名参与者呈现了LEAS的简短版本、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)以及情绪调节问卷(ERQ),后者评估重新评价和抑制作为情绪调节策略。针对情绪觉察水平对问卷数据进行了分析。
LEAS得分与抑郁无关,但与自我报告的焦虑有关。尽管效应量较小或中等,但情绪调节策略与负面情感之间不同的相关模式与情绪觉察的内隐和外显水平有关。在具有内隐情绪觉察的参与者中,抑制与更高的焦虑和抑郁有关,而在具有外显情绪觉察的参与者中,除了抑制与抑郁呈正相关外,我们还发现重新评价与抑郁呈负相关。这些发现与年龄无关。在女性中,高频率使用抑制和低频率使用重新评价与负面情感的关联比男性更强。
我们的初步研究结果表明,对情绪的有意识觉察可能是将重新评价作为一种适应性情绪调节策略加以运用的前提条件。它们鼓励进一步研究潜意识和意识情绪觉察之间的关系以及适应性或适应不良性情绪调节策略的偏好。在普通人群的代表性样本中发现的相关趋势在临床样本中可能会更加明显。