Suppr超能文献

对比遗传性癌症家族风险个体与生物医学研究人员在生物样本研究方面的伦理观点:对研究人员培训的启示

Contrasting the ethical perspectives of biospecimen research among individuals with familial risk for hereditary cancer and biomedical researchers: implications for researcher training.

作者信息

Quinn Gwendolyn P, Koskan Alexis, Sehovic Ivana, Pal Tuya, Meade Cathy, Gwede Clement K

机构信息

1 Population Sciences Division, Moffitt Cancer Center , Tampa, Florida.

出版信息

Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2014 Jul;18(7):467-73. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2013.0461. Epub 2014 Apr 30.

Abstract

While ethical concerns about participating in biospecimen research have been previously identified, few studies have reported the concerns among individuals with familial risk for hereditary cancer (IFRs). At the same time, biomedical researchers often lack training in discussing such concerns to potential donors. This study explores IFRs' and biomedical researchers' perceptions of ethical concerns about participating in biobanking research. In separate focus groups, IFRs and biomedical researchers participated in 90-min telephone focus groups. Focus group questions centered on knowledge about laws that protect the confidentiality of biospecimen donors, understanding of informed consent and study procedures, and preferences for being recontacted about potential incidental discovery and also study results. A total of 40 IFRs and 32 biomedical researchers participated in the focus groups. Results demonstrated discrepancies between the perceptions of IFRs and researchers. IFRs' concerns centered on health information protection; potential discrimination by insurers and employers; and preferences for being recontacted upon discovery of gene mutations or to communicate study results. Researchers perceived that participants understood laws protecting donors' privacy and (detailed study information outlined in the informed consent process), study outcomes were used to create a training tool kit to increase researchers' understanding of IFRs' concerns about biobanking.

摘要

虽然此前已发现参与生物样本研究的伦理问题,但很少有研究报告有遗传性癌症家族风险的个体(IFRs)的相关担忧。与此同时,生物医学研究人员在与潜在捐赠者讨论此类担忧方面往往缺乏培训。本研究探讨了IFRs和生物医学研究人员对参与生物样本库研究的伦理问题的看法。在单独的焦点小组中,IFRs和生物医学研究人员参加了90分钟的电话焦点小组。焦点小组问题集中在对保护生物样本捐赠者保密性的法律的了解、对知情同意和研究程序的理解,以及对就潜在的偶然发现和研究结果再次被联系的偏好。共有40名IFRs和32名生物医学研究人员参加了焦点小组。结果表明IFRs和研究人员的看法存在差异。IFRs的担忧集中在健康信息保护;保险公司和雇主的潜在歧视;以及在发现基因突变或传达研究结果时再次被联系的偏好。研究人员认为参与者理解保护捐赠者隐私的法律以及(知情同意过程中概述的详细研究信息),研究结果被用于创建一个培训工具包,以提高研究人员对IFRs对生物样本库担忧问题的理解。

相似文献

7
Research Ethics for Clinical Researchers.临床研究人员的研究伦理。
Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2249:53-64. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_4.

本文引用的文献

4
Sharing individual research results with biospecimen contributors: point.与生物样本提供者分享个人研究结果:要点。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Feb;21(2):256-9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0853.
6
Biobanking: the foundation of personalized medicine.生物库:个性化医疗的基础。
Curr Opin Oncol. 2011 Jan;23(1):112-9. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e32834161b8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验