Department of Physical Activity Sciences, Universidad de Los Lagos , Osorno, Chile.
Cellular Physiology Laboratory, Biomedical Department, Faculty of Health Science, Universidad de Antofagasta , Antofagasta, Chile ; Laboratory of Exercise Sciences, Clinica MEDS , Las Condes, Chile.
J Sports Sci Med. 2014 May 1;13(2):287-96. eCollection 2014 May.
The aim of the study was to compare the effects of plyometric training using 30, 60, or 120 s of rest between sets on explosive adaptations in young soccer players. Four groups of athletes (age 10.4 ± 2.3 y; soccer experience 3.3 ± 1.5 y) were randomly formed: control (CG; n = 15), plyometric training with 30 s (G30; n = 13), 60 s (G60; n = 14), and 120 s (G120; n = 12) of rest between training sets. Before and after intervention players were measured in jump ability, 20-m sprint time, change of direction speed (CODS), and kicking performance. The training program was applied during 7 weeks, 2 sessions per week, for a total of 840 jumps. After intervention the G30, G60 and G120 groups showed a significant (p = 0.0001 - 0.04) and small to moderate effect size (ES) improvement in the countermovement jump (ES = 0.49; 0.58; 0.55), 20 cm drop jump reactive strength index (ES = 0.81; 0.89; 0.86), CODS (ES = -1.03; -0.87; -1.04), and kicking performance (ES = 0.39; 0.49; 0.43), with no differences between treatments. The study shows that 30, 60, and 120 s of rest between sets ensure similar significant and small to moderate ES improvement in jump, CODS, and kicking performance during high-intensity short-term explosive training in young male soccer players. Key pointsReplacing some soccer drills by low volume high-intensity plyometric training would be beneficial in jumping, change of direction speed, and kicking ability in young soccer players.A rest period of 30, 60 or 120 seconds between low-volume high-intensity plyometric sets would induce significant and similar explosive adaptations during a short-term training period in young soccer players.Data from this research can be helpful for soccer trainers in choosing efficient drills and characteristics of between sets recovery programs to enhance performances in young male soccer players.
本研究旨在比较使用 30、60 或 120 秒组间休息进行增强式训练对年轻足球运动员爆发力适应的影响。将四组运动员(年龄 10.4±2.3 岁;足球经验 3.3±1.5 年)随机分为对照组(CG;n=15)、30 秒增强式训练组(G30;n=13)、60 秒增强式训练组(G60;n=14)和 120 秒增强式训练组(G120;n=12)。干预前后,对运动员的跳跃能力、20 米冲刺时间、变向速度(CODS)和踢球能力进行测量。训练方案在 7 周内进行,每周 2 次,共进行 840 次跳跃。干预后,G30、G60 和 G120 组的纵跳(ES=0.49;0.58;0.55)、20cm 跳深反应力量指数(ES=0.81;0.89;0.86)、CODS(ES=-1.03;-0.87;-1.04)和踢球能力(ES=0.39;0.49;0.43)均有显著(p=0.0001-0.04)和小到中等的效果量(ES)改善,各组之间无差异。研究表明,在高强度短期爆发性训练中,30、60 和 120 秒的组间休息可以确保年轻男性足球运动员在跳跃、CODS 和踢球能力方面有相似的显著和小到中等的 ES 改善。关键点:用低负荷高强度的增强式训练代替一些足球训练,可以使年轻足球运动员在跳跃、变向速度和踢球能力方面受益。在低负荷高强度的增强式训练中,30、60 或 120 秒的组间休息可以在短期训练期间引起显著且相似的爆发力适应。本研究的数据可以帮助足球教练选择有效的训练和组间恢复方案的特点,以提高年轻男性足球运动员的表现。