Mohan Sumit, Mutell Richard, Patzer Rachel E, Holt James, Cohen David, McClellan William
1 Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY. 2 Apex Health Innovations, Simi Valley, CA. 3 Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA. 4 Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA. 5 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. 6 Renal Division, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA. 7 Address correspondence to: Sumit Mohan, M.D., M.P.H., Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, 622 W 168th Street, PH4-124, New York, NY 10032.
Transplantation. 2014 Sep 27;98(6):640-5. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000125.
Geographic variation in kidney transplantation rates in the United States has been described previously but remains unexplained by age, race, sex, or socioeconomic status differences. Geographic variations in the concentration of poverty appear to impact end-stage renal disease care and potentially access to transplantation.
We studied the impact of how spatial topography of poverty across geographical regions in the contiguous United States is associated with kidney transplantation in the 48 contiguous U.S. states.
We found considerable geographic variation in transplantation rates across the country that persisted across quartiles of county-level median household income and percentage minority population. Higher transplant rates were seen with increasing median household income and decreasing minority populations but were not influenced by education level. Transplantation rates in counties with poverty rates above the national average had low transplant rates, but these rates were influenced by the poverty level in the surrounding counties. Similarly, wealthy counties had higher transplant rates but were lowered in counties of relative wealth that were surrounded by less wealthy counties.
Our results underline the geographical heterogeneity of kidney transplantation in the United States and identify regions of the country most likely to benefit from interventions that may reduce disparities in transplantation.
美国肾脏移植率的地理差异此前已有描述,但年龄、种族、性别或社会经济地位差异无法解释这种现象。贫困集中度的地理差异似乎会影响终末期肾病的治疗,并可能影响移植机会。
我们研究了美国本土各地区贫困的空间分布状况与美国48个本土州肾脏移植之间的关联。
我们发现,全国范围内的移植率存在显著的地理差异,这种差异在县级家庭收入中位数和少数族裔人口百分比的四分位数中持续存在。家庭收入中位数增加和少数族裔人口减少时,移植率较高,但不受教育水平影响。贫困率高于全国平均水平的县移植率较低,但这些县的移植率受周边县贫困水平的影响。同样,富裕县的移植率较高,但在被较贫困县包围的相对富裕县中移植率较低。
我们的研究结果突显了美国肾脏移植的地理异质性,并确定了美国最有可能从减少移植差异的干预措施中受益的地区。