Yao Weirong, Yan Rongzeng, Ma Lin, Wan Huiping, Yu Yanmin, Cheng Xia, Li Yingliang
Department of Radiation Oncology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Tumour Biol. 2014 Aug;35(8):7793-8. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-1997-7. Epub 2014 May 10.
The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess if the -634G/C polymorphism represents a predisposition factor for the risk of breast cancer. We included eight published case-control studies, in which a total of 6,175 cancer cases and 6,421 cancer-free controls were included. Pooled ORs and 95 % CIs were calculated by the fixed effects model to evaluate the association of the -634G/C polymorphism and breast cancer risk. When all studies were pooled, we did not find statistical evidence of any significant association with overall breast cancer risk (ORBB vs. bb = 1.00, 95 % CI = 0.93-1.07, P = 0.999; ORBB + Bb vs. bb = 1.00, 95 % CI = 0.95-1.05, P = 0.999; ORBB vs. Bb + bb = 1.03, 95 % CI = 0.96-1.09, P = 0.984; ORallele B vs. allele b = 1.01, 95 % CI = 0.97-1.05, P = 0.998; ORBb vs. bb = 0.99, 95 % CI = 0.92-1.06, P = 0.992). In further stratified analyses by ethnicity and control source, no significant association was revealed. This study suggests that the -634G/C polymorphism does not appear to represent a risk factor for breast cancer.
本荟萃分析的目的是评估-634G/C基因多态性是否是乳腺癌风险的一个易感因素。我们纳入了八项已发表的病例对照研究,共纳入6175例癌症病例和6421例无癌对照。采用固定效应模型计算合并比值比(OR)和95%可信区间(CI),以评估-634G/C基因多态性与乳腺癌风险的关联。当汇总所有研究时,我们未发现与总体乳腺癌风险存在任何显著关联的统计学证据(ORBB vs. bb = 1.00,95%CI = 0.93 - 1.07,P = 0.999;ORBB + Bb vs. bb = 1.00,95%CI = 0.95 - 1.05,P = 0.999;ORBB vs. Bb + bb = 1.03,95%CI = 0.96 - 1.09,P = 0.984;OR等位基因B vs. 等位基因b = 1.01,95%CI = 0.97 - 1.05,P = 0.998;ORBb vs. bb = 0.99,95%CI = 0.92 - 1.06,P = 0.992)。在按种族和对照来源进行的进一步分层分析中,未发现显著关联。本研究表明,-634G/C基因多态性似乎不是乳腺癌的一个风险因素。