Suppr超能文献

幸福 5:开发和验证一种改善人口福祉的诊断工具。

The well-being 5: development and validation of a diagnostic instrument to improve population well-being.

机构信息

1 Healthways, Inc., Center for Health Research , Franklin, Tennessee.

出版信息

Popul Health Manag. 2014 Dec;17(6):357-65. doi: 10.1089/pop.2013.0119.

Abstract

Building upon extensive research from 2 validated well-being instruments, the objective of this research was to develop and validate a comprehensive and actionable well-being instrument that informs and facilitates improvement of well-being for individuals, communities, and nations. The goals of the measure were comprehensiveness, validity and reliability, significant relationships with health and performance outcomes, and diagnostic capability for intervention. For measure development and validation, questions from the Well-being Assessment and Wellbeing Finder were simultaneously administered as a test item pool to over 13,000 individuals across 3 independent samples. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted on a random selection from the first sample and confirmed in the other samples. Further evidence of validity was established through correlations to the established well-being scores from the Well-Being Assessment and Wellbeing Finder, and individual outcomes capturing health care utilization and productivity. Results showed the Well-Being 5 score comprehensively captures the known constructs within well-being, demonstrates good reliability and validity, significantly relates to health and performance outcomes, is diagnostic and informative for intervention, and can track and compare well-being over time and across groups. With this tool, well-being deficiencies within a population can be effectively identified, prioritized, and addressed, yielding the potential for substantial improvements to the health status, performance, and quality of life for individuals and cost savings for stakeholders.

摘要

基于两项经过验证的幸福量表的广泛研究,本研究旨在开发和验证一种全面而可行的幸福感量表,为个人、社区和国家提供幸福感的改善信息并促进其改善。该测量的目标是全面性、有效性和可靠性,与健康和绩效结果的显著关系,以及干预的诊断能力。为了进行测量开发和验证,幸福感评估和幸福感发现中的问题同时作为测试项目池被施测于三个独立样本中的 13000 多人。对第一组样本中的随机选择进行了探索性因素分析,并在其他样本中得到了证实。通过与幸福感评估和幸福感发现中已建立的幸福感得分以及捕获医疗保健利用和生产力的个体结果的相关性,进一步确立了有效性的证据。结果表明,幸福感 5 得分全面涵盖了幸福感的已知结构,具有良好的信度和效度,与健康和绩效结果显著相关,对干预具有诊断和信息作用,可随时间和群体追踪和比较幸福感。通过这个工具,可以有效地识别、优先处理和解决人群中的幸福感不足问题,为个人的健康状况、绩效和生活质量以及利益相关者的成本节约带来巨大的改善潜力。

相似文献

4
The Development and Validation of the Sexual and Relationship Distress Scale.性与关系困扰量表的编制与验证。
J Sex Med. 2018 Aug;15(8):1167-1179. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jul 20.

引用本文的文献

5
The well-being of head start teachers: a scoping literature review.开端计划教师的福祉:一项范围界定文献综述
J Early Child Teach Educ. 2023;44(4):747-772. doi: 10.1080/10901027.2022.2147880. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
6
Association of Population Well-Being With Cardiovascular Outcomes.人口福祉与心血管结局的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2321740. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.21740.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验