Yao Tingting, Sung Hai-Yen, Huang Jidong, Chu Lela, St Helen Gideon, Max Wendy
Institute for Health & Aging, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Nov 6;20:101244. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101244. eCollection 2020 Dec.
Although numerous studies have examined the impact of cigarette prices on cigarette demand, research examining the impact of e-cigarette and cigarette prices on e-cigarette demand is relatively limited. This study estimated the impact of e-cigarette and cigarette prices on e-cigarette and cigarette sales in California. Using the 2012-2017 Nielsen Retail Scanner Data, we constructed e-cigarette prices, cigarette prices, and per capita e-cigarette and cigarette sales by year, quarter, and Nielsen scantrack market in California. E-cigarettes were categorized as disposable or reusable. Separate fixed-effects models estimated the impact of e-cigarette and cigarette prices on per capita disposable e-cigarette, reusable e-cigarette, and cigarette sales controlling for year, quarter, market, and smoke-free air law coverage. Average prices were $5.86 per pack of 20 cigarettes, $9.80 per disposable e-cigarette, and $19.11 per reusable e-cigarette. When prices of disposable e-cigarettes, reusable e-cigarettes, and cigarettes increased by 1%, per capita sales of the products decreased by 0.37%, 0.20%, and 0.21% respectively. Cigarette prices were positively associated with per capita sales of reusable e-cigarettes, indicating reusable e-cigarettes are substitutes for cigarettes. Reusable e-cigarette prices were positively associated with per capita sales of disposable e-cigarettes, indicating disposable e-cigarettes are substitutes for reusable e-cigarettes. No statistically significant association was found between disposable/reusable e-cigarette prices and cigarette sales. Our results suggest that raising prices of disposable e-cigarettes, reusable e-cigarettes, and cigarettes such as via tobacco excise tax increases would result in reduced sales for the products. Policymakers should consider the substitution between e-cigarettes and cigarettes when designing tobacco control policies.
尽管众多研究探讨了卷烟价格对卷烟需求的影响,但考察电子烟和卷烟价格对电子烟需求影响的研究相对有限。本研究估计了电子烟和卷烟价格对加利福尼亚州电子烟和卷烟销量的影响。利用2012 - 2017年尼尔森零售扫描数据,我们按年份、季度以及加利福尼亚州尼尔森扫描市场构建了电子烟价格、卷烟价格以及人均电子烟和卷烟销量。电子烟分为一次性和可重复使用两种类型。通过单独的固定效应模型估计电子烟和卷烟价格对人均一次性电子烟、可重复使用电子烟以及卷烟销量的影响,并对年份、季度、市场和无烟空气法覆盖范围进行控制。每包20支卷烟的平均价格为5.86美元,每支一次性电子烟为9.80美元,每支可重复使用电子烟为19.11美元。当一次性电子烟、可重复使用电子烟和卷烟价格上涨1%时,这些产品的人均销量分别下降0.37%、0.20%和0.21%。卷烟价格与可重复使用电子烟的人均销量呈正相关,表明可重复使用电子烟是卷烟的替代品。可重复使用电子烟价格与一次性电子烟的人均销量呈正相关,表明一次性电子烟是可重复使用电子烟的替代品。未发现一次性/可重复使用电子烟价格与卷烟销量之间存在统计学上的显著关联。我们的结果表明,通过提高烟草消费税等方式提高一次性电子烟、可重复使用电子烟和卷烟的价格,将导致这些产品的销量下降。政策制定者在设计烟草控制政策时应考虑电子烟与卷烟之间的替代关系。