• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

宗教与主观幸福感:西方和东方宗教团体以不同方式实现主观幸福感。

Religion and Subjective Well-Being: Western and Eastern Religious Groups Achieved Subjective Well-Being in Different Ways.

作者信息

Shiah Yung-Jong, Chang Frances, Chiang Shih-Kuang, Tam Wai-Cheong Carl

机构信息

Graduate Institute of Counseling Psychology and Rehabilitation Counseling, National Kaohsiung Normal University, No. 116, Heping 1st Road, Kaohsiung, 802, Taiwan.

Applied Foreign Languages, Chienkuo Technology University, Changhua City, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Relig Health. 2016 Aug;55(4):1263-9. doi: 10.1007/s10943-014-9905-4.

DOI:10.1007/s10943-014-9905-4
PMID:24944164
Abstract

Culture can moderate which variables most influence subjective well-being (SWB). Because religion can be conceptualized as culture, religious differences can be considered cultural differences. However, there have been few studies comparing how different religious groups evaluate SWB at any given time. This study is among the first to investigate this issue. The present study compared Buddhists, Taoists, Christians, and atheists. In addition to demographic items, 451 Chinese adults completed Chinese version of the Socially Oriented Cultural Conception of SWB Scale. Religious belief was distributed as follows: 10 % Christian, 20 % Buddhist, 25 % Taoist, and 43 % atheists. As predicted, the socially oriented cultural conception of SWB was found to be highest among Buddhists, followed in order by Taoists, atheists, and Christians. It was concluded that the various religious groups achieved SWB in different ways.

摘要

文化可以调节哪些变量对主观幸福感(SWB)影响最大。由于宗教可被视为文化,宗教差异可被视作文化差异。然而,几乎没有研究比较过不同宗教群体在任何特定时间如何评估主观幸福感。本研究是首批调查此问题的研究之一。本研究比较了佛教徒、道教徒、基督徒和无神论者。除人口统计学项目外,451名中国成年人完成了中文版的主观幸福感社会导向文化概念量表。宗教信仰分布如下:10%为基督徒,20%为佛教徒,25%为道教徒,43%为无神论者。正如预测的那样,主观幸福感的社会导向文化概念在佛教徒中最高,其次依次是道教徒、无神论者和基督徒。研究得出结论,不同宗教群体以不同方式实现主观幸福感。

相似文献

1
Religion and Subjective Well-Being: Western and Eastern Religious Groups Achieved Subjective Well-Being in Different Ways.宗教与主观幸福感:西方和东方宗教团体以不同方式实现主观幸福感。
J Relig Health. 2016 Aug;55(4):1263-9. doi: 10.1007/s10943-014-9905-4.
2
Are Happiness and Life Satisfaction Different Across Religious Groups? Exploring Determinants of Happiness and Life Satisfaction.不同宗教群体的幸福和生活满意度存在差异吗?探索幸福和生活满意度的决定因素。
J Relig Health. 2018 Dec;57(6):2118-2139. doi: 10.1007/s10943-017-0481-2.
3
Paranormal beliefs and religiosity: Chinese version of the Revised Paranormal Belief Scale.超自然信念与宗教信仰:修订版超自然信念量表中文版
Psychol Rep. 2010 Oct;107(2):367-82. doi: 10.2466/08.09.17.PR0.107.5.367-382.
4
The religion paradox: if religion makes people happy, why are so many dropping out?宗教悖论:如果宗教能让人感到幸福,为什么那么多人选择退出?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Dec;101(6):1278-90. doi: 10.1037/a0024402. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
5
Assessment of the Perceived Importance of Religion in Couple Relationships in Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, and the Nonreligious.对基督教徒、穆斯林、佛教徒及无宗教信仰者中宗教在伴侣关系中感知重要性的评估。
Fam Process. 2022 Mar;61(1):326-341. doi: 10.1111/famp.12669. Epub 2021 May 3.
6
Karma or Immortality: Can Religion Influence Space-Time Mappings?业力还是不朽:宗教能影响时空映射吗?
Cogn Sci. 2018 Apr;42(3):1041-1056. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12579. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
7
Psychological Resources, Personality Traits and Buddhism: A Study of Italian Young Adults.心理资源、人格特质与佛教:一项关于意大利年轻人的研究。
J Relig Health. 2018 Dec;57(6):2416-2430. doi: 10.1007/s10943-018-0618-y.
8
Religious Affiliation Among Older Age Groups Worldwide: Estimates for 2010 and Projections Until 2050.全球老年群体中的宗教信仰:2010 年的估计数和 2050 年的预测。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2018 Oct 10;73(8):1439-1445. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbw144.
9
Worry and intrinsic/extrinsic religious orientation among Buddhist (Thai) and Christian (Canadian) elderly persons.泰国佛教和加拿大基督教老年人群体中的担忧与内在/外在宗教取向
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1997;44(1):73-83. doi: 10.2190/ENQG-HNV4-5G0D-CQ88.
10
Adult smokers' perception of the role of religion and religious leadership on smoking and association with quitting: a comparison between Thai Buddhists and Malaysian Muslims.成年吸烟者对宗教及宗教领袖在吸烟与戒烟方面所起作用的认知:泰国佛教徒与马来西亚穆斯林的比较
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Oct;69(7):1025-31. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.042. Epub 2009 Aug 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Considering Confucian, Buddhist, and Taoist influences on daily emotion regulation and affect in Chinese Australian trauma survivors.探讨儒家、佛教和道教对澳大利亚华裔创伤幸存者日常情绪调节及情感的影响。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2518813. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2518813. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
2
Religious Involvement, Education, and Subjective Well-Being Among Older Adults in Taiwan.台湾老年人的宗教参与、教育程度与主观幸福感
J Relig Health. 2025 Jun;64(3):2386-2402. doi: 10.1007/s10943-024-02159-5. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
3
Happiness Maximization Is a WEIRD Way of Living.

本文引用的文献

1
Paranormal beliefs and religiosity: Chinese version of the Revised Paranormal Belief Scale.超自然信念与宗教信仰:修订版超自然信念量表中文版
Psychol Rep. 2010 Oct;107(2):367-82. doi: 10.2466/08.09.17.PR0.107.5.367-382.
2
Why does religiosity persist?宗教信仰为何持续存在?
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2010 Feb;14(1):3-6. doi: 10.1177/1088868309352323. Epub 2009 Dec 23.
3
Religion, health, and psychological well-being.宗教、健康和心理健康。
将幸福最大化是一种怪异的生活方式。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Feb 13:17456916231208367. doi: 10.1177/17456916231208367.
4
Living Arrangements and Subjective Well-Being of Elderly Chinese Tibetan People: The Mediating Role of Religion.藏族老年人的居住安排和主观幸福感:宗教的中介作用。
J Relig Health. 2023 Oct;62(5):3158-3174. doi: 10.1007/s10943-023-01753-3. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
5
Religiousness and Quality of Life Among Older Adults of Different Ethnic Groups in Malaysia: A Five-Year Follow-up Study.宗教信仰与马来西亚不同族群老年群体生活质量的关系:一项为期五年的随访研究。
J Relig Health. 2022 Apr;61(2):1548-1563. doi: 10.1007/s10943-021-01371-x. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
6
Understanding subjective well-being: perspectives from psychology and public health.理解主观幸福感:来自心理学和公共卫生领域的视角
Public Health Rev. 2020 Nov 19;41(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40985-020-00142-5.
J Relig Health. 2010 Jun;49(2):149-63. doi: 10.1007/s10943-009-9242-1. Epub 2009 Mar 13.
4
Religion as culture: religious individualism and collectivism among american catholics, jews, and protestants.作为文化的宗教:美国天主教徒、犹太教徒和新教徒中的宗教个人主义与集体主义
J Pers. 2007 Aug;75(4):709-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00454.x.
5
Religiousness/spirituality and health: a meaning systems perspective.宗教信仰/精神性与健康:一种意义系统视角
J Behav Med. 2007 Aug;30(4):319-28. doi: 10.1007/s10865-007-9111-x. Epub 2007 May 24.
6
When personality and culture clash: the psychological distress of allocentrics in an individualist culture and idiocentrics in a collectivist culture.当个性与文化发生冲突时:个人主义文化中自我中心者以及集体主义文化中他人中心者的心理困扰。
Transcult Psychiatry. 2006 Sep;43(3):331-61. doi: 10.1177/1363461506066982.
7
Psychology and culture.心理学与文化
Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:689-714. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141927.
8
Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: emotional and cognitive evaluations of life.人格、文化与主观幸福感:对生活的情感和认知评价。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2003;54:403-25. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056. Epub 2002 Jun 10.
9
Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses.重新思考个人主义与集体主义:理论假设与元分析评估
Psychol Bull. 2002 Jan;128(1):3-72.
10
On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being.论幸福与人类潜能:享乐主义幸福与实现自我幸福的研究综述
Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:141-66. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141.