Suppr超能文献

认知行为体育活动问卷的编制与验证

Development and Validation of the Cognitive Behavioral Physical Activity Questionnaire.

作者信息

Schembre Susan M, Durand Casey P, Blissmer Bryan J, Greene Geoffrey W

出版信息

Am J Health Promot. 2015 Sep-Oct;30(1):58-65. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.131021-QUAN-539. Epub 2014 Aug 27.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Develop and demonstrate preliminary validation of a brief questionnaire aimed at assessing social cognitive determinants of physical activity (PA) in a college population.

DESIGN

Quantitative and observational.

SETTING

A midsized northeastern university.

SUBJECTS

Convenience sample of 827 male and female college students age 18 to 24 years.

MEASURES

International Physical Activity Questionnaire and a PA stage-of-change algorithm.

ANALYSIS

A sequential process of survey development, including item generation and data reduction analyses by factor analysis, was followed with the goal of creating a parsimonious questionnaire. Structural equation modeling was used for confirmatory factor analysis and construct validation was confirmed against self-reported PA and stage of change. Validation analyses were replicated in a second, independent sample of 1032 college students.

RESULTS

Fifteen items reflecting PA self-regulation, outcome expectations, and personal barriers explained 65% of the questionnaire data and explained 28.6% and 39.5% of the variance in total PA and moderate-to-vigorous-intensity PA, respectively. Scale scores were distinguishable across the stages of change. Findings were similar when the Cognitive Behavioral Physical Activity Questionnaire (CBPAQ) was tested in a similar and independent sample of college students (40%; R (2) moderate-to-vigorous-intensity PA = .40; p < .001).

CONCLUSION

The CBPAQ successfully explains and predicts PA behavior in a college population, warranting its incorporation into future studies aiming at understanding and improving on PA behavior in college students.

摘要

目的

开发并展示一份简短问卷的初步验证情况,该问卷旨在评估大学生体育活动(PA)的社会认知决定因素。

设计

定量和观察性研究。

地点

一所位于东北部的中型大学。

受试者

827名年龄在18至24岁之间的男女大学生组成的便利样本。

测量方法

国际体育活动问卷和体育活动变化阶段算法。

分析

采用了一个问卷开发的顺序过程,包括通过因子分析进行项目生成和数据简化分析,目的是创建一份简洁的问卷。结构方程模型用于验证性因子分析,并根据自我报告的体育活动和变化阶段确认结构效度。在1032名大学生组成的第二个独立样本中重复进行验证分析。

结果

反映体育活动自我调节、结果期望和个人障碍的15个项目解释了问卷数据的65%,分别解释了总体育活动和中等至剧烈强度体育活动中28.6%和39.5%的方差。量表得分在变化阶段之间具有可区分性。当在一个类似且独立的大学生样本中对认知行为体育活动问卷(CBPAQ)进行测试时,结果相似(中等至剧烈强度体育活动的R² = 0.40;p < 0.001)。

结论

CBPAQ成功地解释并预测了大学生的体育活动行为,这表明有必要将其纳入未来旨在理解和改善大学生体育活动行为的研究中。

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of the Cognitive Behavioral Physical Activity Questionnaire.
Am J Health Promot. 2015 Sep-Oct;30(1):58-65. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.131021-QUAN-539. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
2
Path Analysis of Campus Walkability/Bikeability and College Students' Physical Activity Attitudes, Behaviors, and Body Mass Index.
Am J Health Promot. 2018 Mar;32(3):578-586. doi: 10.1177/0890117116666357. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
3
Eat, sleep, work, play: associations of weight status and health-related behaviors among young adult college students.
Am J Health Promot. 2014 Nov-Dec;29(2):e64-72. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.130327-QUAN-130. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
4
Intuitive eating: associations with physical activity motivation and BMI.
Am J Health Promot. 2015 Jan-Feb;29(3):e91-9. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.130305-QUAN-97.
5
Motivation for HPV Vaccination Among Young Adult Men: Validation of TTM Decisional Balance and Self-Efficacy Constructs.
Am J Health Promot. 2016 Jan-Feb;30(3):163-71. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.131108-QUAN-570. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
6
Differences in Weight-Related Behavioral Profiles by Sexual Orientation Among College Men: A Latent Class Analysis.
Am J Health Promot. 2016 Nov;30(8):623-633. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.140714-QUAN-331. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
7
Validity Evaluation of the College Student Physical Literacy Questionnaire.
Front Public Health. 2022 May 26;10:856659. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.856659. eCollection 2022.
8
Predicting physical activity behavior among university students using the multi-process action control framework.
Psychol Sport Exerc. 2024 Nov;75:102716. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102716. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
9
Dyadic Effects of Individual and Friend on Physical Activity in College Students.
Public Health Nurs. 2015 Sep-Oct;32(5):430-9. doi: 10.1111/phn.12176. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
10
Development and validation of green eating behaviors, stage of change, decisional balance, and self-efficacy scales in college students.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014 Sep-Oct;46(5):324-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Mar 5.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effects of Overextraction on Factor and Component Analysis.
Multivariate Behav Res. 1992 Jul 1;27(3):387-415. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2703_5.
2
Social cognitive theories used to explain physical activity behavior in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Prev Med. 2013 May;56(5):245-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.01.013. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
3
Impact of an online healthful eating and physical activity program for college students.
Am J Health Promot. 2012 Nov-Dec;27(2):e47-58. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.110606-QUAN-239.
4
Prevalence of obesity and trends in body mass index among US children and adolescents, 1999-2010.
JAMA. 2012 Feb 1;307(5):483-90. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.40. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
5
Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999-2010.
JAMA. 2012 Feb 1;307(5):491-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.39. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
7
Establishing construct validity of a stages-of-change algorithm for physical activity.
Am J Health Promot. 2010 Nov-Dec;25(2):e11-20. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.090914-QUAN-296.
8
Criterion-related validity of the short International Physical Activity Questionnaire against exercise capacity in young adults.
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010 Aug;17(4):380-6. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328333ede6.
9
College students' barriers and enablers for healthful weight management: a qualitative study.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2009 Jul-Aug;41(4):281-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2008.04.354.
10
Accumulation of behavioral validation evidence for physical activity stage of change.
Health Psychol. 2008 Jan;27(1S):S43-53. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.1(Suppl.).S43.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验