• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于药效团的DOCK相似性评分

Pharmacophore-based similarity scoring for DOCK.

作者信息

Jiang Lingling, Rizzo Robert C

机构信息

Department of Applied Mathematics & Statistics, ‡Institute of Chemical Biology & Drug Discovery, §Laufer Center for Physical & Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University , Stony Brook, New York 11794-3600, United States.

出版信息

J Phys Chem B. 2015 Jan 22;119(3):1083-102. doi: 10.1021/jp506555w. Epub 2014 Oct 10.

DOI:10.1021/jp506555w
PMID:25229837
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4306494/
Abstract

Pharmacophore modeling incorporates geometric and chemical features of known inhibitors and/or targeted binding sites to rationally identify and design new drug leads. In this study, we have encoded a three-dimensional pharmacophore matching similarity (FMS) scoring function into the structure-based design program DOCK. Validation and characterization of the method are presented through pose reproduction, crossdocking, and enrichment studies. When used alone, FMS scoring dramatically improves pose reproduction success to 93.5% (∼20% increase) and reduces sampling failures to 3.7% (∼6% drop) compared to the standard energy score (SGE) across 1043 protein-ligand complexes. The combined FMS+SGE function further improves success to 98.3%. Crossdocking experiments using FMS and FMS+SGE scoring, for six diverse protein families, similarly showed improvements in success, provided proper pharmacophore references are employed. For enrichment, incorporating pharmacophores during sampling and scoring, in most cases, also yield improved outcomes when docking and rank-ordering libraries of known actives and decoys to 15 systems. Retrospective analyses of virtual screenings to three clinical drug targets (EGFR, IGF-1R, and HIVgp41) using X-ray structures of known inhibitors as pharmacophore references are also reported, including a customized FMS scoring protocol to bias on selected regions in the reference. Overall, the results and fundamental insights gained from this study should benefit the docking community in general, particularly researchers using the new FMS method to guide computational drug discovery with DOCK.

摘要

药效团建模结合了已知抑制剂和/或靶向结合位点的几何和化学特征,以合理地识别和设计新的药物先导物。在本研究中,我们将三维药效团匹配相似性(FMS)评分函数编码到基于结构的设计程序DOCK中。通过构象重现、交叉对接和富集研究对该方法进行了验证和表征。单独使用时,与标准能量评分(SGE)相比,FMS评分在1043个蛋白质-配体复合物中显著提高了构象重现成功率至93.5%(增加约20%),并将采样失败率降低至3.7%(下降约6%)。FMS+SGE组合函数进一步将成功率提高到98.3%。对于六个不同的蛋白质家族,使用FMS和FMS+SGE评分进行的交叉对接实验同样显示成功率有所提高,前提是采用合适的药效团参考。对于富集,在对15个系统的已知活性化合物和诱饵库进行对接和排序时,在采样和评分过程中纳入药效团在大多数情况下也能产生更好的结果。还报告了使用已知抑制剂的X射线结构作为药效团参考对三个临床药物靶点(EGFR、IGF-1R和HIVgp41)进行虚拟筛选的回顾性分析,包括一种定制的FMS评分协议,以偏向参考中的选定区域。总体而言,本研究获得的结果和基本见解应使整个对接领域受益,特别是使用新的FMS方法指导使用DOCK进行计算药物发现的研究人员。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/03ccc84f0e2e/jp-2014-06555w_0020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/074281be8daf/jp-2014-06555w_0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/2e1d6be2df66/jp-2014-06555w_0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/5b4e1e99aecc/jp-2014-06555w_0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/e8c483286e65/jp-2014-06555w_0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/b5d92fbf93ce/jp-2014-06555w_0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/e29ccfb5b72e/jp-2014-06555w_0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/f7eac1ddec6a/jp-2014-06555w_0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/601aaabc1ee6/jp-2014-06555w_0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/ddb2aa5ac9c4/jp-2014-06555w_0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/bc64f2b1cd5e/jp-2014-06555w_0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/663f1cb7eb15/jp-2014-06555w_0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/41af00b9207e/jp-2014-06555w_0013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/d8f5b2ac8a69/jp-2014-06555w_0014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/30edd81748c2/jp-2014-06555w_0015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/50d5b0be812d/jp-2014-06555w_0016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/5c8f6a00ca02/jp-2014-06555w_0017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/7ad9ec9a9255/jp-2014-06555w_0018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/351c082c3972/jp-2014-06555w_0019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/03ccc84f0e2e/jp-2014-06555w_0020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/074281be8daf/jp-2014-06555w_0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/2e1d6be2df66/jp-2014-06555w_0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/5b4e1e99aecc/jp-2014-06555w_0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/e8c483286e65/jp-2014-06555w_0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/b5d92fbf93ce/jp-2014-06555w_0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/e29ccfb5b72e/jp-2014-06555w_0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/f7eac1ddec6a/jp-2014-06555w_0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/601aaabc1ee6/jp-2014-06555w_0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/ddb2aa5ac9c4/jp-2014-06555w_0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/bc64f2b1cd5e/jp-2014-06555w_0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/663f1cb7eb15/jp-2014-06555w_0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/41af00b9207e/jp-2014-06555w_0013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/d8f5b2ac8a69/jp-2014-06555w_0014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/30edd81748c2/jp-2014-06555w_0015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/50d5b0be812d/jp-2014-06555w_0016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/5c8f6a00ca02/jp-2014-06555w_0017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/7ad9ec9a9255/jp-2014-06555w_0018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/351c082c3972/jp-2014-06555w_0019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec94/4306494/03ccc84f0e2e/jp-2014-06555w_0020.jpg

相似文献

1
Pharmacophore-based similarity scoring for DOCK.基于药效团的DOCK相似性评分
J Phys Chem B. 2015 Jan 22;119(3):1083-102. doi: 10.1021/jp506555w. Epub 2014 Oct 10.
2
Strategies for lead discovery: application of footprint similarity targeting HIVgp41.先导化合物发现策略:基于足迹相似性靶向HIV gp41的应用
Bioorg Med Chem. 2014 Jan 1;22(1):651-61. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2013.10.022. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
3
Implementation and evaluation of a docking-rescoring method using molecular footprint comparisons.一种使用分子足迹比较的对接重打分方法的实施与评估
J Comput Chem. 2011 Jul 30;32(10):2273-89. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21814. Epub 2011 May 3.
4
DOCK 6: Impact of new features and current docking performance.DOCK 6:新特性及当前对接性能的影响
J Comput Chem. 2015 Jun 5;36(15):1132-56. doi: 10.1002/jcc.23905.
5
Beware of machine learning-based scoring functions-on the danger of developing black boxes.警惕基于机器学习的评分函数——开发黑盒的危险。
J Chem Inf Model. 2014 Oct 27;54(10):2807-15. doi: 10.1021/ci500406k. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
6
Investigation of MM-PBSA rescoring of docking poses.对接姿势的MM-PBSA重新评分研究。
J Chem Inf Model. 2008 May;48(5):1081-91. doi: 10.1021/ci700470c. Epub 2008 May 9.
7
Cosolvent-Based Protein Pharmacophore for Ligand Enrichment in Virtual Screening.基于共溶剂的蛋白药效团在虚拟筛选中配体富集的应用
J Chem Inf Model. 2019 Aug 26;59(8):3572-3583. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00371. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
8
E-pharmacophore-based virtual screening to identify GSK-3β inhibitors.基于电子药效团的虚拟筛选以鉴定糖原合成酶激酶-3β抑制剂。
J Recept Signal Transduct Res. 2016 Oct;36(5):445-58. doi: 10.3109/10799893.2015.1122043. Epub 2015 Dec 20.
9
Similarity-driven flexible ligand docking.相似性驱动的柔性配体对接
Proteins. 2000 Sep 1;40(4):623-36. doi: 10.1002/1097-0134(20000901)40:4<623::aid-prot70>3.0.co;2-i.
10
Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.通过使用 MM-GBSA 对多个 X 射线蛋白质构象中的配体构象进行重新排序,从而提高对接结果。
J Chem Inf Model. 2014 Oct 27;54(10):2697-717. doi: 10.1021/ci5003735. Epub 2014 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Consensus screening for a challenging target: the quest for P-glycoprotein inhibitors.针对具有挑战性靶点的共识筛选:寻找P-糖蛋白抑制剂。
RSC Med Chem. 2024 Jan 22;15(2):720-732. doi: 10.1039/d3md00649b. eCollection 2024 Feb 21.
2
A molecular evolution algorithm for ligand design in DOCK.DOCK 中配体设计的分子进化算法。
J Comput Chem. 2022 Nov 5;43(29):1942-1963. doi: 10.1002/jcc.26993. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
3
Benchmarking AlphaFold-enabled molecular docking predictions for antibiotic discovery.针对抗生素发现的基于 AlphaFold 赋能的分子对接预测进行基准测试。

本文引用的文献

1
Setting the record straight: the origin of the pharmacophore concept.正本清源:药效基团概念的起源。
J Chem Inf Model. 2014 May 27;54(5):1269-83. doi: 10.1021/ci5000533. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
2
Implementation of the Hungarian algorithm to account for ligand symmetry and similarity in structure-based design.实现匈牙利算法以考虑基于结构设计中配体的对称性和相似性。
J Chem Inf Model. 2014 Feb 24;54(2):518-29. doi: 10.1021/ci400534h. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
3
Strategies for lead discovery: application of footprint similarity targeting HIVgp41.
Mol Syst Biol. 2022 Sep;18(9):e11081. doi: 10.15252/msb.202211081.
4
Delta Machine Learning to Improve Scoring-Ranking-Screening Performances of Protein-Ligand Scoring Functions.利用 Delta 机器学习改进蛋白质配体打分函数的评分-排名-筛选性能。
J Chem Inf Model. 2022 Jun 13;62(11):2696-2712. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00485. Epub 2022 May 17.
5
Leveraging nonstructural data to predict structures and affinities of protein-ligand complexes.利用非结构数据预测蛋白质-配体复合物的结构和亲和力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 21;118(51). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2112621118.
6
DockingApp RF: A State-of-the-Art Novel Scoring Function for Molecular Docking in a User-Friendly Interface to AutoDock Vina.对接应用程序 RF:一种用于分子对接的最先进的新型评分函数,具有用户友好的界面,可与 AutoDock Vina 配合使用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Dec 15;21(24):9548. doi: 10.3390/ijms21249548.
7
Identification of Zika Virus Inhibitors Using Homology Modeling and Similarity-Based Screening to Target Glycoprotein E.基于同源建模和基于相似性的筛选技术鉴定寨卡病毒抑制剂以靶向糖蛋白 E
Biochemistry. 2020 Oct 6;59(39):3709-3724. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00458. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
8
Application of MM-PBSA Methods in Virtual Screening.MM-PBSA 方法在虚拟筛选中的应用。
Molecules. 2020 Apr 23;25(8):1971. doi: 10.3390/molecules25081971.
9
Incorporating Explicit Water Molecules and Ligand Conformation Stability in Machine-Learning Scoring Functions.将显式水分子和配体构象稳定性纳入机器学习打分函数中。
J Chem Inf Model. 2019 Nov 25;59(11):4540-4549. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00645. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
10
Identification of Fatty Acid Binding Protein 5 Inhibitors Through Similarity-Based Screening.通过基于相似性的筛选鉴定脂肪酸结合蛋白 5 抑制剂。
Biochemistry. 2019 Oct 22;58(42):4304-4316. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.9b00625. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
先导化合物发现策略:基于足迹相似性靶向HIV gp41的应用
Bioorg Med Chem. 2014 Jan 1;22(1):651-61. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2013.10.022. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
4
Computer-Aided Approaches for Targeting HIVgp41.计算机辅助方法靶向 HIVgp41。
Biology (Basel). 2012 Aug 20;1(2):311-38. doi: 10.3390/biology1020311.
5
Exploring the potential of protein-based pharmacophore models in ligand pose prediction and ranking.探索基于蛋白质的药效团模型在配体构象预测和排序中的潜力。
J Chem Inf Model. 2013 May 24;53(5):1179-90. doi: 10.1021/ci400143r. Epub 2013 May 13.
6
Grid-based molecular footprint comparison method for docking and de novo design: application to HIVgp41.基于网格的分子足迹比较方法在对接和从头设计中的应用:以 HIVgp41 为例。
J Comput Chem. 2013 May 30;34(14):1226-1240. doi: 10.1002/jcc.23245. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
7
Targeting fatty acid binding protein (FABP) anandamide transporters - a novel strategy for development of anti-inflammatory and anti-nociceptive drugs.靶向脂肪酸结合蛋白 (FABP) 内源性大麻素转运体 - 开发抗炎和抗伤害性药物的新策略。
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e50968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050968. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
8
Directory of useful decoys, enhanced (DUD-E): better ligands and decoys for better benchmarking.有用诱饵目录增强版(DUD-E):更好的配体和诱饵,用于更好的基准测试。
J Med Chem. 2012 Jul 26;55(14):6582-94. doi: 10.1021/jm300687e. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
9
Comparative analysis of pharmacophore screening tools.药效团筛选工具的比较分析。
J Chem Inf Model. 2012 Jun 25;52(6):1607-20. doi: 10.1021/ci2005274. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
10
Evaluation of DOCK 6 as a pose generation and database enrichment tool.评估 DOCK 6 作为构象生成和数据库丰富工具的性能。
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2012 Jun;26(6):749-73. doi: 10.1007/s10822-012-9565-y. Epub 2012 May 9.