Jonnal Ravi S, Kocaoglu Omer P, Zawadzki Robert J, Lee Sang-Hyuck, Werner John S, Miller Donald T
Vision Science and Advanced Retinal Imaging Laboratory, University of California, Davis Eye Center, Sacramento, California, United States.
School of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Oct 16;55(12):7904-18. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14907.
To test the recently proposed hypothesis that the second outer retinal band, observed in clinical OCT images, originates from the inner segment ellipsoid, by measuring: (1) the thickness of this band within single cone photoreceptors, and (2) its respective distance from the putative external limiting membrane (band 1) and cone outer segment tips (band 3).
Adaptive optics-optical coherence tomography images were acquired from four subjects without known retinal disease. Images were obtained at foveal (2°) and perifoveal (5°) locations. Cone photoreceptors (n = 9593) were identified and segmented in three dimensions using custom software. Features corresponding to bands 1, 2, and 3 were automatically identified. The thickness of band 2 was assessed in each cell by fitting the longitudinal reflectance profile of the band with a Gaussian function. Distances between bands 1 and 2, and between 2 and 3, respectively, were also measured in each cell. Two independent calibration techniques were employed to determine the depth scale (physical length per pixel) of the imaging system.
When resolved within single cells, the thickness of band 2 is a factor of three to four times narrower than in corresponding clinical OCT images. The distribution of band 2 thickness across subjects and eccentricities had a modal value of 4.7 μm, with 48% of the cones falling between 4.1 and 5.2 μm. No significant differences were found between cells in the fovea and perifovea. The distance separating bands 1 and 2 was found to be larger than the distance between bands 2 and 3, across subjects and eccentricities, with a significantly larger difference at 5° than 2°.
On the basis of these findings, we suggest that ascription of the outer retinal band 2 to the inner segment ellipsoid is unjustified, because the ellipsoid is both too thick and proximally located to produce the band.
通过测量:(1)单个视锥光感受器内该条带的厚度,以及(2)其与假定的外界膜(条带1)和视锥外段尖端(条带3)的各自距离,来检验最近提出的一个假说,即在临床光学相干断层扫描(OCT)图像中观察到的视网膜外第二条带起源于内节椭圆体。
从四名无已知视网膜疾病的受试者获取自适应光学 - 光学相干断层扫描图像。在黄斑中心凹(2°)和黄斑旁(5°)位置获取图像。使用定制软件在三维空间中识别并分割视锥光感受器(n = 9593)。自动识别与条带1、2和3对应的特征。通过用高斯函数拟合条带的纵向反射率曲线来评估每个细胞中条带2的厚度。还在每个细胞中测量条带1和2之间以及2和3之间的距离。采用两种独立的校准技术来确定成像系统的深度比例(每像素的物理长度)。
当在单个细胞内分辨时,条带2的厚度比相应的临床OCT图像窄三到四倍。条带2厚度在受试者和不同偏心度之间的分布模式值为4.7μm,48%的视锥细胞厚度在4.1至5.2μm之间。在黄斑中心凹和黄斑旁的细胞之间未发现显著差异。发现在受试者和不同偏心度情况下,条带1和2之间的距离大于条带2和3之间的距离,在5°处的差异比在2°处显著更大。
基于这些发现,我们认为将视网膜外条带2归因于内节椭圆体是不合理的,因为椭圆体太厚且位置太靠近,无法产生该条带。