Rosenzveig Alicia, Kuspinar Ayse, Daskalopoulou Stella S, Mayo Nancy E
Division of Clinical Epidemiology (AR, NEM), McGill University Health Centre; School of Physical and Occupational Therapy (AK, NEM); and Department of Medicine (SSD), Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2014 Nov;93(22):e120. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000120.
Clinicians rarely systematically document how their patients are feeling. Single item questions have been created to help obtain and monitor patient relevant outcomes, a requirement of patient-centered care.The objective of this review was to identify the psychometric properties for single items related to health aspects that only the patient can report (health perception, stress, pain, fatigue, depression, anxiety, and sleep quality). A secondary objective was to create a bank of valid single items in a format suitable for use in clinical practice.Data sources used were Ovid MEDLINE (1948 to May 2013), EMBASE (1960 to May 2013), and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (1960 to May 2013).For the study appraisal, 24 articles were systematically reviewed. A critical appraisal tool was used to determine the quality of articles.Items were included if they were tested as single items, related to the construct, measured symptom severity, and referred to recent experiences.The psychometric properties of each item were extracted. Validity and reliability was observed for the items when compared with clinical interviews or well-validated measures. The items for general health perception and anxiety showed weak to moderate strength correlations (r = 0.28-0.70). The depression and stress items showed good area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.85 and 0.73-0.88, respectively, with high sensitivity and specificity. The fatigue item demonstrated a strong effect size and correlations up to r = 0.80. The 2 pain items and the sleep item showed high reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.85, κ = 0.76, ICC = 0.9, respectively).The search targeted articles about psychometric properties of single items. Articles that did not have this as the primary objective may have been missed. Furthermore, not all the articles included had the complete set of psychometric properties for each item.There is sufficient evidence to warrant the use of single items in clinical practice. They are simple, easily implemented, and efficient and thus provide an alternative to multi-item questionnaires. To facilitate their use, the top performing items were combined into the visual analog health states, which provides a quick profile of how the patient is feeling. This information would be useful for regular long-term monitoring.
临床医生很少系统地记录他们的患者的感受。已经设计了单项问题来帮助获取和监测与患者相关的结果,这是患者中心护理的一项要求。本综述的目的是确定与只有患者才能报告的健康方面相关的单项问题的心理测量特性(健康感知、压力、疼痛、疲劳、抑郁、焦虑和睡眠质量)。第二个目标是以适合临床实践使用的格式创建一组有效的单项问题。使用的数据源包括Ovid MEDLINE(1948年至2013年5月)、EMBASE(1960年至2013年5月)以及护理及相关健康文献累积索引(1960年至2013年5月)。
对于研究评估,系统地回顾了24篇文章。使用一种批判性评估工具来确定文章的质量。如果单项问题经过测试、与该结构相关、测量症状严重程度并涉及近期经历,则将其纳入。提取了每个问题的心理测量特性。与临床访谈或经过充分验证的测量方法相比,观察到这些问题的有效性和可靠性。一般健康感知和焦虑问题显示出弱至中等强度的相关性(r = 0.28 - 0.70)。抑郁和压力问题在接受者操作特征曲线下的面积分别为0.85和0.73 - 0.88,具有高敏感性和特异性。疲劳问题显示出较大的效应量,相关性高达r = 0.80。2个疼痛问题和睡眠问题显示出高可靠性(组内相关系数[ICC]分别为0.85、κ = 0.76、ICC = 0.9)。
该搜索针对关于单项问题心理测量特性的文章。那些没有将此作为主要目标的文章可能被遗漏了。此外,并非所有纳入的文章都包含每个问题完整的心理测量特性。
有足够的证据支持在临床实践中使用单项问题。它们简单、易于实施且高效,因此为多项问卷提供了一种替代方法。为便于使用,表现最佳的问题被组合成视觉模拟健康状态,它能快速呈现患者的感受概况。这些信息对于定期的长期监测将是有用的。