Dascal A, Chan-Thim J, Morahan M, Portnoy J, Mendelson J
Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Apr;27(4):700-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.4.700-704.1989.
A commercial 4-h direct herpes simplex virus (HSV) antigen detection enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kit (Du Pont Herpchek) was evaluated by using 273 clinical specimens obtained in a hospital-based infectious disease practice. The EIA was compared with a standard culture method in which WI38 cells were inoculated within 20 min of sample collection. Cultures were observed for 2 weeks, and positive findings were confirmed by fluorescein-labeled monoclonal antibody (FA) staining. The values for the overall HSV detection rate were 40.7% by the standard culture method and 41.4% by EIA. In eight cases, the EIA was positive, while the culture method was negative; however, clinical data and confirmatory blocking EIA suggested that a true HSV infection was present. For six FA-confirmed, culture-positive samples, the direct EIA was negative; however, an EIA performed on the supernatants of these cultures was positive, suggesting that the failure of the EIA to detect these samples was not due to lack of strain specificity of the test. After confirmatory tests of standard culture and EIA discrepant results, the overall sensitivity of the test was 95.0% (113 of 119) and the specificity was 100% (154 of 154).
采用一种商用的4小时直接单纯疱疹病毒(HSV)抗原检测酶免疫分析(EIA)试剂盒(杜邦Herpchek),对在一家医院传染病科收集的273份临床标本进行了评估。将该EIA与标准培养方法进行比较,标准培养方法是在采集样本后20分钟内接种WI38细胞。培养观察2周,阳性结果通过荧光素标记单克隆抗体(FA)染色确认。标准培养方法的HSV总体检出率为40.7%,EIA为41.4%。有8例EIA呈阳性,而培养方法为阴性;然而,临床数据和确认性阻断EIA表明存在真正的HSV感染。对于6份经FA确认、培养阳性的样本,直接EIA为阴性;然而,对这些培养物上清液进行的EIA呈阳性,这表明EIA未能检测到这些样本并非由于检测缺乏菌株特异性。在对标准培养和EIA结果不一致的情况进行确认性检测后,该检测的总体敏感性为95.0%(119例中的113例),特异性为100%(154例中的154例)。