The Mind Research Network, Albuquerque NM, USA ; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center - Institute of Living, Hartford CT, USA ; Departments of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine New Haven, CT, USA ; Departments of Neurobiology, Yale University School of Medicine New Haven, CT, USA.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Nov 7;8:897. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00897. eCollection 2014.
Schizophrenia (SZ) and bipolar disorder (BP) share significant overlap in clinical symptoms, brain characteristics, and risk genes, and both are associated with dysconnectivity among large-scale brain networks. Resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) data facilitates studying macroscopic connectivity among distant brain regions. Standard approaches to identifying such connectivity include seed-based correlation and data-driven clustering methods such as independent component analysis (ICA) but typically focus on average connectivity. In this study, we utilize ICA on rsfMRI data to obtain intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs) in cohorts of healthy controls (HCs) and age matched SZ and BP patients. Subsequently, we investigated difference in functional network connectivity, defined as pairwise correlations among the timecourses of ICNs, between HCs and patients. We quantified differences in both static (average) and dynamic (windowed) connectivity during the entire scan duration. Disease-specific differences were identified in connectivity within different dynamic states. Notably, results suggest that patients make fewer transitions to some states (states 1, 2, and 4) compared to HCs, with most such differences confined to a single state. SZ patients showed more differences from healthy subjects than did bipolars, including both hyper and hypo connectivity in one common connectivity state (dynamic state 3). Also group differences between SZ and bipolar patients were identified in patterns (states) of connectivity involving the frontal (dynamic state 1) and frontal-parietal regions (dynamic state 3). Our results provide new information about these illnesses and strongly suggest that state-based analyses are critical to avoid averaging together important factors that can help distinguish these clinical groups.
精神分裂症(SZ)和双相情感障碍(BP)在临床症状、大脑特征和风险基因方面有显著重叠,并且都与大脑网络之间的连接失调有关。静息态功能磁共振成像(rsfMRI)数据有助于研究大脑远距离区域之间的宏观连接。识别这种连接的标准方法包括基于种子的相关性和数据驱动的聚类方法,如独立成分分析(ICA),但通常侧重于平均连接。在这项研究中,我们利用 rsfMRI 数据的 ICA 在健康对照组(HCs)和年龄匹配的 SZ 和 BP 患者队列中获得内在连接网络(ICN)。随后,我们研究了 HCs 和患者之间功能网络连接的差异,定义为 ICN 时间序列之间的成对相关性。我们量化了整个扫描过程中静态(平均)和动态(窗口)连接的差异。在不同的动态状态下发现了与疾病相关的连接差异。值得注意的是,结果表明与 HCs 相比,患者在一些状态(状态 1、2 和 4)之间的转换更少,大多数差异局限于单个状态。与双相情感障碍患者相比,SZ 患者与健康受试者的差异更大,包括在一个常见的连接状态(动态状态 3)中存在过度和过低连接。SZ 和双相情感障碍患者之间的组间差异也在涉及额叶(动态状态 1)和额顶区域(动态状态 3)的连接模式中被识别出来。我们的研究结果提供了关于这些疾病的新信息,并强烈表明基于状态的分析对于避免将有助于区分这些临床群体的重要因素平均化至关重要。