• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交过度包容有好处吗?虚拟球范式中的行为和事件相关电位效应。

Are there benefits of social overinclusion? Behavioral and ERP effects in the Cyberball paradigm.

作者信息

Niedeggen Michael, Sarauli Natia, Cacciola Santi, Weschke Sarah

机构信息

Department of Educational Science and Psychology, Experimental Psychology and Neuropsychology, Freie Universität Berlin Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Nov 19;8:935. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00935. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00935
PMID:25477807
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4237054/
Abstract

Social participation can be examined using the Cyberball paradigm, a virtual ball-tossing game. Reducing the involvement of the participant is supposed to activate a neural alarm system, and to threaten fundamental social needs. Our previous findings indicate that the latter process can be linked to an enhancement of the centro-parietal P3 amplitude, signaling a modulation of the subjective expectancy of involvement. A preceding more frontal ERP component, the P2, does not depend of the probability of involvement, but reflects the appraisal of social reward. In this experiment, we examined whether overinclusion of participants enhances the satisfaction of social needs, reduces the P3 amplitude correspondingly, and affects central reward processing. In the control condition, participants (n = 40) were included (two co-player, ball possession 33%), and overincluded (ball possession 46%) in the experimental condition. In a counterbalanced design, we also controlled for the order of conditions. As predicted, overinclusion increased the satisfaction of social needs, with exception of "self esteem", and reduced the P3 amplitude. As for the frontal P2, overinclusion only enhanced the amplitudes if the less frequent involvement (condition: inclusion) was experienced previously. The behavioral and P3 data suggest that the feelings of social belonging, meaningful existence, and control are related to the subjective expectancy of social involvement, and can be described in terms of a linear continuum ranging from exclusion to overinclusion. In contrast, appraisal of social rewards does not depend on the probability of involvement.

摘要

社会参与可以通过赛博球范式(一种虚拟抛球游戏)来进行研究。减少参与者的参与度被认为会激活一个神经警报系统,并威胁到基本的社会需求。我们之前的研究结果表明,后一个过程可能与中央顶叶P3波幅的增强有关,这表明参与的主观预期受到了调节。一个更靠前的ERP成分,即P2波,并不取决于参与的概率,而是反映了对社会奖励的评估。在本实验中,我们研究了过度纳入参与者是否会提高社会需求的满意度,相应地降低P3波幅,并影响中枢奖励处理。在控制条件下,参与者(n = 40)被纳入实验(有两个共同玩家,持球概率为33%),在实验条件下则被过度纳入(持球概率为46%)。在一个平衡设计中,我们还控制了条件的顺序。正如预测的那样,过度纳入提高了社会需求的满意度,但“自尊”除外,并降低了P3波幅。至于额叶P2波,只有在之前经历过较少频率的参与(条件:纳入)时,过度纳入才会增强波幅。行为和P3数据表明,社会归属感、有意义的存在和控制感与社会参与的主观预期有关,并且可以用一个从被排斥到过度纳入的线性连续体来描述。相比之下,对社会奖励的评估并不取决于参与的概率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90d8/4237054/58316b0b40ef/fnhum-08-00935-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90d8/4237054/a41f64ec670e/fnhum-08-00935-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90d8/4237054/58316b0b40ef/fnhum-08-00935-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90d8/4237054/a41f64ec670e/fnhum-08-00935-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90d8/4237054/58316b0b40ef/fnhum-08-00935-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Are there benefits of social overinclusion? Behavioral and ERP effects in the Cyberball paradigm.社交过度包容有好处吗?虚拟球范式中的行为和事件相关电位效应。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Nov 19;8:935. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00935. eCollection 2014.
2
Violated Expectations in the Cyberball Paradigm: Testing the Expectancy Account of Social Participation With ERP.网络投球范式中违背的预期:用事件相关电位测试社会参与的预期账户
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 25;9:1762. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01762. eCollection 2018.
3
Target and Non-Target Processing during Oddball and Cyberball: A Comparative Event-Related Potential Study.Oddball任务和Cyberball游戏中的目标与非目标处理:一项比较性事件相关电位研究
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 21;11(4):e0153941. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153941. eCollection 2016.
4
The effect of the physical presence of co-players on perceived ostracism and event-related brain potentials in the cyberball paradigm.共同玩家的身体存在对网络球范式中被排斥感和事件相关脑电位的影响。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 9;8(8):e71928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071928. eCollection 2013.
5
Dull to Social Acceptance Rather than Sensitivity to Social Ostracism in Interpersonal Interaction for Depression: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence from Cyberball Tasks.抑郁症患者在人际互动中对社会接纳反应迟钝而非对社会排斥敏感:来自丢球任务的行为和电生理证据
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Mar 31;11:162. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00162. eCollection 2017.
6
ERP effects and perceived exclusion in the Cyberball paradigm: Correlates of expectancy violation?在赛博球范式中的事件相关电位效应与感知到的排斥:违背预期的相关因素?
Brain Res. 2015 Oct 22;1624:265-274. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.07.038. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
7
Affective and cognitive impact of social overinclusion: a meta-analytic review of cyberball studies.社交过度包容的情感和认知影响:网络球研究的元分析综述。
Cogn Emot. 2023 May-Jun;37(3):412-429. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2022.2163619. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
8
Reactions to claimed and granted overinclusion: Extending research on the effects of claimball versus cyberball.对声称和授予的过度包容的反应:扩展关于 claimball 与 cyberball 效应的研究。
J Soc Psychol. 2020;160(1):105-116. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2019.1610348. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
9
Feeling excluded no matter what? Bias in the processing of social participation in borderline personality disorder.无论如何都感到被排斥?边缘型人格障碍中社会参与处理的偏见。
Neuroimage Clin. 2018 Apr 26;19:343-350. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.04.031. eCollection 2018.
10
Afraid of Social Exclusion: Fear of Missing Out Predicts Cyberball-Induced Ostracism.害怕社会排斥:错失恐惧预示着网络球游戏引发的排斥。
J Technol Behav Sci. 2022;7(3):315-324. doi: 10.1007/s41347-022-00251-9. Epub 2022 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Electrophysiological and Behavioral Responses to Overinclusion Following Preexposure to Social Threat.社会威胁预暴露后对过度包含的电生理和行为反应。
Psychophysiology. 2025 Jul;62(7):e70107. doi: 10.1111/psyp.70107.
2
From Loss of Control to Social Exclusion: ERP Effects of Preexposure to a Social Threat in the Cyberball Paradigm.从失控到社会排斥:网络投球范式中预先暴露于社会威胁的事件相关电位效应
Brain Sci. 2022 Sep 10;12(9):1225. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12091225.
3
The Cyberball task in people after obesity surgery: preliminary evaluation of cognitive effects of social inclusion and exclusion with a laboratory task.

本文引用的文献

1
A quantitative meta-analysis of functional imaging studies of social rejection.社会排斥功能成像研究的定量荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2013;3:2027. doi: 10.1038/srep02027.
2
The effect of the physical presence of co-players on perceived ostracism and event-related brain potentials in the cyberball paradigm.共同玩家的身体存在对网络球范式中被排斥感和事件相关脑电位的影响。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 9;8(8):e71928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071928. eCollection 2013.
3
Reversing the negative psychological sequelae of exclusion: inclusion is ameliorative but not protective against the aversive consequences of exclusion.
肥胖症手术后人群的“虚拟弹球”任务:使用实验室任务初步评估社会包容和排斥的认知效应。
Eat Weight Disord. 2022 May;27(4):1523-1533. doi: 10.1007/s40519-021-01297-z. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
4
Processing of increased frequency of social interaction in social anxiety disorder and borderline personality disorder.社交焦虑障碍和边缘型人格障碍中社会互动频率增加的处理。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 9;11(1):5489. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85027-6.
5
Violated Expectations in the Cyberball Paradigm: Testing the Expectancy Account of Social Participation With ERP.网络投球范式中违背的预期:用事件相关电位测试社会参与的预期账户
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 25;9:1762. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01762. eCollection 2018.
6
Feeling excluded no matter what? Bias in the processing of social participation in borderline personality disorder.无论如何都感到被排斥?边缘型人格障碍中社会参与处理的偏见。
Neuroimage Clin. 2018 Apr 26;19:343-350. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.04.031. eCollection 2018.
7
Dull to Social Acceptance Rather than Sensitivity to Social Ostracism in Interpersonal Interaction for Depression: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence from Cyberball Tasks.抑郁症患者在人际互动中对社会接纳反应迟钝而非对社会排斥敏感:来自丢球任务的行为和电生理证据
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Mar 31;11:162. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00162. eCollection 2017.
8
Being low prepares for being neglected: Verticality affects expectancy of social participation.地位低下会让人做好被忽视的准备:地位高低会影响社会参与的预期。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Apr;24(2):574-581. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1115-5.
9
Target and Non-Target Processing during Oddball and Cyberball: A Comparative Event-Related Potential Study.Oddball任务和Cyberball游戏中的目标与非目标处理:一项比较性事件相关电位研究
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 21;11(4):e0153941. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153941. eCollection 2016.
10
Effect Anticipation Affects Perceptual, Cognitive, and Motor Phases of Response Preparation: Evidence from an Event-Related Potential (ERP) Study.效应预期影响反应准备的感知、认知和运动阶段:来自一项事件相关电位(ERP)研究的证据。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Jan 26;10:5. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00005. eCollection 2016.
消除排斥的负面心理后果:包容可改善但不能预防排斥的不良后果。
Emotion. 2013 Feb;13(1):139-50. doi: 10.1037/a0029521. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
4
Is dorsal anterior cingulate cortex activation in response to social exclusion due to expectancy violation? An fMRI study.背侧前扣带回皮层对因期望违背导致的社会排斥产生激活是这样吗?一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Front Evol Neurosci. 2012 Jul 27;4:11. doi: 10.3389/fnevo.2012.00011. eCollection 2012.
5
Decoding the invisible forces of social connections.解码社会关系的无形力量。
Front Integr Neurosci. 2012 Jul 25;6:51. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2012.00051. eCollection 2012.
6
Processing social participation: an event-related brain potential study.社会参与的处理:一项事件相关脑电位研究。
Neuroreport. 2011 Jun 22;22(9):453-8. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283476b67.
7
Reward positivity elicited by predictive cues.由预测性线索引发的奖赏积极反应。
Neuroreport. 2011 Mar 30;22(5):249-52. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328345441d.
8
Reward, addiction, and emotion regulation systems associated with rejection in love.与恋爱中被拒绝有关的奖励、成瘾和情绪调节系统。
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Jul;104(1):51-60. doi: 10.1152/jn.00784.2009. Epub 2010 May 5.
9
Disgust selectively modulates reciprocal fairness in economic interactions.厌恶感会有选择地调节经济互动中的互惠公平。
Emotion. 2010 Apr;10(2):169-80. doi: 10.1037/a0017826.
10
Rejection elicits emotional reactions but neither causes immediate distress nor lowers self-esteem: a meta-analytic review of 192 studies on social exclusion.拒绝会引起情绪反应,但既不会立即引起痛苦,也不会降低自尊心:对 192 项社会排斥研究的元分析综述。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2009 Nov;13(4):269-309. doi: 10.1177/1088868309346065. Epub 2009 Sep 21.