Department of Psychology, University of Turin Turin, Italy.
Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 8;5:1419. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01419. eCollection 2014.
Psychoanalytic literature on extreme traumatization usually distinguishes between natural catastrophes and man-made catastrophes. While the first ones are usually sensed as nature's ferocity, fate, or God's will, the second ones are experienced as a volountary and violent attack aimed at disrupting other human beings. In this paper we focus on man-made disasters caused by a profit-driven logic. When traumatization is due to irresponsible actions perpetrated by the owners of the major economic resource of a community, it deeply affects the identity of the group, entailing the loss of basic trust and lively parts of the Self. In such a situation, where the whole community is severely traumatized, psychoanalytic group therapy seems to be the most suitable setting: it allows to place the historization of the event and the creation of multiple narratives of somato-psychic suffering. Trust and faith are two crucial factors in the encounter with patients lacking a sense of vitality. The working through of each one through the group field is an essential forerunner to the construction of a recovered sense of faith and reliability that precedes the onset of a true new-beginning.
精神分析学文献通常将极端创伤分为自然灾害和人为灾害。自然灾害通常被视为自然的残酷、命运或上帝的旨意,而人为灾害则被视为旨在扰乱他人的自愿和暴力攻击。本文关注的是由逐利逻辑导致的人为灾难。当创伤是由于社区主要经济资源所有者的不负责任行为造成时,它会深刻影响群体的身份认同,导致基本信任和自我活力部分的丧失。在这种情况下,整个社区都受到严重创伤,精神分析团体治疗似乎是最合适的环境:它允许对事件进行历史化,并创造躯体心理痛苦的多种叙述。信任和信念是与缺乏活力感的患者相遇的两个关键因素。通过团体领域对每个人的处理是构建恢复的信任和可靠性感的重要先驱,这先于真正的新开端的出现。