Suppr超能文献

使用模拟需求程序估计电子烟的交叉价格弹性。

Estimating cross-price elasticity of e-cigarettes using a simulated demand procedure.

作者信息

Grace Randolph C, Kivell Bronwyn M, Laugesen Murray

机构信息

University of Canterbury, Department of Psychology, Christchurch, New Zealand;

School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand;

出版信息

Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 May;17(5):592-8. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu268. Epub 2014 Dec 28.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Our goal was to measure the cross-price elasticity of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) and simulated demand for tobacco cigarettes both in the presence and absence of e-cigarette availability.

METHOD

A sample of New Zealand smokers (N = 210) completed a Cigarette Purchase Task to indicate their demand for tobacco at a range of prices. They sampled an e-cigarette and rated it and their own-brand tobacco for favorability, and indicated how many e-cigarettes and regular cigarettes they would purchase at 0.5×, 1×, and 2× the current market price for regular cigarettes, assuming that the price of e-cigarettes remained constant.

RESULTS

Cross-price elasticity for e-cigarettes was estimated as 0.16, and was significantly positive, indicating that e-cigarettes were partially substitutable for regular cigarettes. Simulated demand for regular cigarettes at current market prices decreased by 42.8% when e-cigarettes were available, and e-cigarettes were rated 81% as favorably as own-brand tobacco. However when cigarettes cost 2× the current market price, significantly more smokers said they would quit (50.2%) if e-cigarettes were not available than if they were available (30.0%).

CONCLUSION

Results show that e-cigarettes are potentially substitutable for regular cigarettes and their availability will reduce tobacco consumption. However, e-cigarettes may discourage smokers from quitting entirely as cigarette price increases, so policy makers should consider maintaining a constant relative price differential between e-cigarettes and tobacco cigarettes.

摘要

引言

我们的目标是测量电子烟的交叉价格弹性,以及在有和没有电子烟供应的情况下对卷烟的模拟需求。

方法

一组新西兰吸烟者(N = 210)完成了一项卷烟购买任务,以表明他们在一系列价格下对烟草的需求。他们试用了一种电子烟,并对其和自己品牌的烟草的好感度进行评分,并指出假设电子烟价格保持不变,在常规卷烟当前市场价格的0.5倍、1倍和2倍时,他们会购买多少电子烟和普通卷烟。

结果

电子烟的交叉价格弹性估计为0.16,且显著为正,表明电子烟可部分替代普通卷烟。当有电子烟供应时,当前市场价格下对普通卷烟的模拟需求下降了42.8%,电子烟的好感度被评为自有品牌烟草的81%。然而,当卷烟价格为当前市场价格的2倍时,显著更多的吸烟者表示,如果没有电子烟,他们会戒烟(50.2%),而如果有电子烟,这一比例为30.0%。

结论

结果表明,电子烟可能可替代普通卷烟,其供应将减少烟草消费。然而,随着卷烟价格上涨,电子烟可能会阻碍吸烟者完全戒烟,因此政策制定者应考虑保持电子烟和卷烟之间恒定的相对价格差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验