Richman Nadia I, Böhm Monika, Adams Susan B, Alvarez Fernando, Bergey Elizabeth A, Bunn John J S, Burnham Quinton, Cordeiro Jay, Coughran Jason, Crandall Keith A, Dawkins Kathryn L, DiStefano Robert J, Doran Niall E, Edsman Lennart, Eversole Arnold G, Füreder Leopold, Furse James M, Gherardi Francesca, Hamr Premek, Holdich David M, Horwitz Pierre, Johnston Kerrylyn, Jones Clive M, Jones Julia P G, Jones Robert L, Jones Thomas G, Kawai Tadashi, Lawler Susan, López-Mejía Marilu, Miller Rebecca M, Pedraza-Lara Carlos, Reynolds Julian D, Richardson Alastair M M, Schultz Mark B, Schuster Guenter A, Sibley Peter J, Souty-Grosset Catherine, Taylor Christopher A, Thoma Roger F, Walls Jerry, Walsh Todd S, Collen Ben
Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY, UK School of Environment, Natural Resources and Geography, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK
Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY, UK.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Feb 19;370(1662):20140060. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0060.
Rates of biodiversity loss are higher in freshwater ecosystems than in most terrestrial or marine ecosystems, making freshwater conservation a priority. However, prioritization methods are impeded by insufficient knowledge on the distribution and conservation status of freshwater taxa, particularly invertebrates. We evaluated the extinction risk of the world's 590 freshwater crayfish species using the IUCN Categories and Criteria and found 32% of all species are threatened with extinction. The level of extinction risk differed between families, with proportionally more threatened species in the Parastacidae and Astacidae than in the Cambaridae. Four described species were Extinct and 21% were assessed as Data Deficient. There was geographical variation in the dominant threats affecting the main centres of crayfish diversity. The majority of threatened US and Mexican species face threats associated with urban development, pollution, damming and water management. Conversely, the majority of Australian threatened species are affected by climate change, harvesting, agriculture and invasive species. Only a small proportion of crayfish are found within the boundaries of protected areas, suggesting that alternative means of long-term protection will be required. Our study highlights many of the significant challenges yet to come for freshwater biodiversity unless conservation planning shifts from a reactive to proactive approach.
淡水生态系统中生物多样性丧失的速度高于大多数陆地或海洋生态系统,这使得淡水保护成为当务之急。然而,由于对淡水生物分类群,尤其是无脊椎动物的分布和保护状况了解不足,优先排序方法受到阻碍。我们使用国际自然保护联盟(IUCN)的类别和标准评估了世界上590种淡水小龙虾物种的灭绝风险,发现所有物种中有32%面临灭绝威胁。不同科的灭绝风险水平有所不同,拟螯虾科和海螯虾科中受威胁物种的比例高于螯虾科。有4个已描述物种灭绝,21%被评估为数据缺乏。影响小龙虾多样性主要中心的主要威胁存在地理差异。美国和墨西哥大多数受威胁物种面临与城市发展、污染、筑坝和水资源管理相关的威胁。相反,澳大利亚大多数受威胁物种受到气候变化、捕捞、农业和入侵物种的影响。只有一小部分小龙虾分布在保护区范围内,这表明需要其他长期保护手段。我们的研究强调,除非保护规划从被动应对转向主动出击,否则淡水生物多样性未来将面临许多重大挑战。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015-2-19
Conserv Biol. 2024-2
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005-2-28
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2006-5
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015-2-19
Animals (Basel). 2023-4-3
Conserv Biol. 2002-2
Trends Ecol Evol. 2011-10-23
PLoS Biol. 2011-5-24
Science. 2010-10-26
Nature. 2010-9-30
Evolution. 2008-6