Patti Antonino, Bianco Antonino, Paoli Antonio, Messina Giuseppe, Montalto Maria Alessandra, Bellafiore Marianna, Battaglia Giuseppe, Iovane Angelo, Palma Antonio
Sport and Exercise Sciences Research Unit (A Patti, AB, GM, MAM, MB, GB, AI, A Palma), University of Palermo; Posturalab (A Patti, GM), Italy; and Department of Biomedical Science (A Paoli), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Jan;94(4):e383. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000383.
The Pilates method has recently become a fast-growing popular way of exercise recommended for healthy individuals and those engaged in rehabilitation. Several published studies have examined the effects of Pilates method in people with chronic low back pain (LBP). The objective of this study is to describe and provide an extensive overview of the scientific literature comparing the effectiveness of the Pilates method on pain and disability in patients with chronic nonspecific LBP. The study is based on the data from the following sources: MEDLINE-NLM, MEDLINE-EBSCO, Scopus Elsevier, Cochrane, DOAJ, SciELO, and PLOSONE. Original articles and systematic reviews of adults with chronic nonspecific LBP that evaluated pain and/or disability were included in this study; studies in which the primary treatment was based on Pilates method exercises compared with no treatment, minimal intervention, other types of intervention, or other types of exercises. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) were adopted. The literature search included 7 electronic databases and the reference list of relevant systematic reviews and original articles to July 2014. Two independent investigators conducted the literature search and performed the synthesis as follows: Study Design; Sample (n); Disability measure; Intervention; and Main results. The searches identified a total of 128 articles. From these, 29 were considered eligible and were included in the analysis. The items were stratified as follows: Pilates method versus other kind of exercises (n = 6 trials) and Pilates method versus no treatment group or minimal intervention for short-term pain (n = 9 trials); the therapeutic effect of the Pilates method in randomized cohorts (n = 5); and analysis of reviews (n = 9). We found that there is a dearth of studies that clearly demonstrates the efficacy of a specific Pilates exercise program over another in the treatment of chronic pain. However, the consensus in the field suggests that Pilates method is more effective than minimal physical exercise intervention in reducing pain. These conclusions need to be supported by other proper investigations.
普拉提方法最近已成为一种快速发展且广受欢迎的运动方式,被推荐给健康人群以及正在进行康复治疗的人。几项已发表的研究探讨了普拉提方法对慢性下背痛(LBP)患者的影响。本研究的目的是描述并全面概述科学文献,比较普拉提方法对慢性非特异性LBP患者疼痛和残疾状况的有效性。该研究基于以下来源的数据:MEDLINE - NLM、MEDLINE - EBSCO、Scopus Elsevier、Cochrane、DOAJ、SciELO和PLOSONE。本研究纳入了评估疼痛和/或残疾状况的慢性非特异性LBP成年患者的原始文章和系统评价;主要治疗基于普拉提方法练习并与无治疗、最小干预、其他类型干预或其他类型运动进行比较的研究。采用了系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)。文献检索涵盖了7个电子数据库以及截至2014年7月相关系统评价和原始文章的参考文献列表。两名独立研究人员进行了文献检索并按以下方式进行综合分析:研究设计;样本量(n);残疾测量;干预措施;以及主要结果。检索共识别出128篇文章。其中,29篇被认为符合条件并纳入分析。项目分层如下:普拉提方法与其他类型运动(n = 6项试验)以及普拉提方法与无治疗组或短期疼痛的最小干预(n = 9项试验);普拉提方法在随机队列中的治疗效果(n = 5);以及综述分析(n = 9)。我们发现,缺乏明确证明特定普拉提运动方案在治疗慢性疼痛方面比另一种方案更有效的研究。然而,该领域的共识表明,普拉提方法在减轻疼痛方面比最小体育锻炼干预更有效。这些结论需要其他适当研究的支持。