• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用格拉斯哥昏迷量表的重复测量和数据挖掘方法预测创伤性脑损伤后的长期预后。

Predicting long-term outcome after traumatic brain injury using repeated measurements of Glasgow Coma Scale and data mining methods.

作者信息

Lu Hsueh-Yi, Li Tzu-Chi, Tu Yong-Kwang, Tsai Jui-Chang, Lai Hong-Shiee, Kuo Lu-Ting

机构信息

Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Douliou City, Yun-Lin county, 640, Taiwan,

出版信息

J Med Syst. 2015 Feb;39(2):14. doi: 10.1007/s10916-014-0187-x. Epub 2015 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1007/s10916-014-0187-x
PMID:25637541
Abstract

Previous studies have identified some clinical parameters for predicting long-term functional recovery and mortality after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Here, data mining methods were combined with serial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores and clinical and laboratory parameters to predict 6-month functional outcome and mortality in patients with TBI. Data of consecutive adult patients presenting at a trauma center with moderate-to-severe head injury were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical parameters including serial GCS measurements at emergency department, 7th day, and 14th day and laboratory data were included for analysis (n = 115). We employed artificial neural network (ANN), naïve Bayes (NB), decision tree, and logistic regression to predict mortality and functional outcomes at 6 months after TBI. Favorable functional outcome was achieved by 34.8% of the patients, and overall 6-month mortality was 25.2%. For 6-month functional outcome prediction, ANN was the best model, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 96.13%, sensitivity of 83.50%, and specificity of 89.73%. The best predictive model for mortality was NB with AUC of 91.14%, sensitivity of 81.17%, and specificity of 90.65%. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated GCS measurements on the 7th and 14th day and difference between emergency room and 14th day GCS score as the most influential attributes both in mortality and functional outcome prediction models. Analysis of serial GCS measurements using data mining methods provided additional predictive information in relation to 6-month mortality and functional outcome in patients with moderate-to-severe TBI.

摘要

先前的研究已经确定了一些用于预测创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后长期功能恢复和死亡率的临床参数。在此,数据挖掘方法与连续的格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分以及临床和实验室参数相结合,以预测TBI患者6个月时的功能结局和死亡率。对在一家创伤中心就诊的连续成年中重度颅脑损伤患者的数据进行了回顾性分析。纳入分析的临床参数包括急诊科、第7天和第14天的连续GCS测量值以及实验室数据(n = 115)。我们采用人工神经网络(ANN)、朴素贝叶斯(NB)、决策树和逻辑回归来预测TBI后6个月的死亡率和功能结局。34.8%的患者获得了良好的功能结局,6个月时的总体死亡率为25.2%。对于6个月功能结局预测,ANN是最佳模型,其受试者操作特征曲线(AUC)下面积为96.13%,灵敏度为83.50%,特异性为89.73%。死亡率的最佳预测模型是NB,AUC为91.14%,灵敏度为81.17%,特异性为90.65%。敏感性分析表明,第7天和第14天的GCS测量值以及急诊室和第14天GCS评分之间差异是死亡率和功能结局预测模型中最具影响力的属性。使用数据挖掘方法对连续GCS测量值进行分析,为中重度TBI患者6个月时的死亡率和功能结局提供了额外的预测信息。

相似文献

1
Predicting long-term outcome after traumatic brain injury using repeated measurements of Glasgow Coma Scale and data mining methods.使用格拉斯哥昏迷量表的重复测量和数据挖掘方法预测创伤性脑损伤后的长期预后。
J Med Syst. 2015 Feb;39(2):14. doi: 10.1007/s10916-014-0187-x. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
2
Analysis of long-term (median 10.5 years) outcomes in children presenting with traumatic brain injury and an initial Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 or 4.对初始格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为3或4分的创伤性脑损伤患儿的长期(中位时间10.5年)预后分析。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015 Oct;16(4):410-9. doi: 10.3171/2015.3.PEDS14679. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
3
Evaluation of the Glasgow Coma Scale-Pupils score for predicting inpatient mortality among patients with traumatic subdural hematoma at United States trauma centers.评估美国创伤中心创伤性硬脑膜下血肿患者格拉斯哥昏迷量表瞳孔评分对内伤住院患者死亡率的预测价值。
J Neurosurg. 2024 May 3;141(4):908-916. doi: 10.3171/2024.2.JNS232695. Print 2024 Oct 1.
4
Using the abbreviated injury severity and Glasgow Coma Scale scores to predict 2-week mortality after traumatic brain injury.使用简明损伤定级标准和格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分预测创伤性脑损伤后2周死亡率。
J Trauma. 2011 Nov;71(5):1172-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31822b0f4b.
5
Pupil evaluation in addition to Glasgow Coma Scale components in prediction of traumatic brain injury and mortality.瞳孔评估除格拉斯哥昏迷量表成分外,对创伤性脑损伤和死亡率的预测作用。
Br J Surg. 2012 Jan;99 Suppl 1:122-30. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7707.
6
A comparison of the Glasgow Coma Scale score to simplified alternative scores for the prediction of traumatic brain injury outcomes.格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分与简化替代评分在预测创伤性脑损伤结局方面的比较。
Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Jan;45(1):37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.07.429.
7
Prognostic value of time-related Glasgow coma scale components in severe traumatic brain injury: a prospective evaluation with respect to 1-year survival and functional outcome.
Int J Rehabil Res. 2013 Sep;36(3):260-7. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e32835fd99a.
8
The predictive value of field versus arrival Glasgow Coma Scale score and TRISS calculations in moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.现场与入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分及创伤和损伤严重度评分计算在中重度创伤性脑损伤中的预测价值。
J Trauma. 2006 May;60(5):985-90. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000205860.96209.1c.
9
The prehospital simplified motor score is as accurate as the prehospital Glasgow coma scale: analysis of a statewide trauma registry.院前简化运动评分与院前格拉斯哥昏迷评分同样准确:全州创伤登记处的分析。
Emerg Med J. 2012 Jun;29(6):492-6. doi: 10.1136/emj.2010.110437. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
10
Mortality prediction in patients with isolated moderate and severe traumatic brain injury using machine learning models.使用机器学习模型预测单纯中重度创伤性脑损伤患者的死亡率。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 9;13(11):e0207192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207192. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Glasgow Coma Scale Score at Admission in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients: A Multicenter Observational Analysis.创伤性脑损伤患者入院时的格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分:一项多中心观察性分析。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 22;14(15):5195. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155195.
2
Predicting outcomes after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury using artificial intelligence: a systematic review.使用人工智能预测中度和重度创伤性脑损伤后的结果:一项系统综述。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jun 18;8(1):373. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01714-y.
3
The determinants for death in hospital following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury in Australia.

本文引用的文献

1
Decision tree based diagnostic system for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea.基于决策树的中重度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停诊断系统
J Med Syst. 2014 Sep;38(9):94. doi: 10.1007/s10916-014-0094-1. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
2
Comparison of AI techniques for prediction of liver fibrosis in hepatitis patients.人工智能技术在预测肝炎患者肝纤维化中的比较
J Med Syst. 2014 Aug;38(8):60. doi: 10.1007/s10916-014-0060-y. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
3
A comparative study on classification of sleep stage based on EEG signals using feature selection and classification algorithms.
澳大利亚中重度创伤性脑损伤患者的院内死亡决定因素。
Emerg Med Australas. 2025 Feb;37(1):e14562. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.14562.
4
A Meta-analysis of Predicting Disorders of Consciousness After Traumatic Brain Injury by Machine Learning Models.机器学习模型预测创伤性脑损伤后意识障碍的Meta分析。
Alpha Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 1;25(3):290-303. doi: 10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.231443. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Identification and Connectomic Profiling of Concussion Using Bayesian Machine Learning.基于贝叶斯机器学习的脑震荡识别与连接组学分析。
J Neurotrauma. 2024 Aug;41(15-16):1883-1900. doi: 10.1089/neu.2023.0509. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
6
Prognosis prediction in traumatic brain injury patients using machine learning algorithms.利用机器学习算法预测创伤性脑损伤患者的预后。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 18;13(1):960. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28188-w.
7
Mechanism of Ferroptosis and Its Relationships with Other Types of Programmed Cell Death: Insights for Potential Therapeutic Benefits in Traumatic Brain Injury.铁死亡的机制及其与其他类型细胞程序性死亡的关系:创伤性脑损伤潜在治疗益处的新视角。
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022 Aug 24;2022:1274550. doi: 10.1155/2022/1274550. eCollection 2022.
8
Chinese Admission Warning Strategy for Predicting the Hospital Discharge Outcome in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.用于预测创伤性脑损伤患者出院结局的中文入院预警策略。
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 13;11(4):974. doi: 10.3390/jcm11040974.
9
Initial CT-based radiomics nomogram for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury: a multicenter development and validation study.基于 CT 的放射组学列线图预测创伤性脑损伤患者住院死亡率:一项多中心开发和验证研究。
Neurol Sci. 2022 Jul;43(7):4363-4372. doi: 10.1007/s10072-022-05954-8. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
10
Harnessing repeated measurements of predictor variables for clinical risk prediction: a review of existing methods.利用预测变量的重复测量进行临床风险预测:现有方法综述
Diagn Progn Res. 2020 Jul 9;4:9. doi: 10.1186/s41512-020-00078-z. eCollection 2020.
基于脑电信号,运用特征选择和分类算法对睡眠阶段进行分类的比较研究。
J Med Syst. 2014 Mar;38(3):18. doi: 10.1007/s10916-014-0018-0. Epub 2014 Mar 9.
4
Glasgow Coma Scale score at intensive care unit discharge predicts the 1-year outcome of patients with severe traumatic brain injury.重症监护病房出院时的格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分可预测重度创伤性脑损伤患者的1年预后。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2013 Jun;39(3):285-92. doi: 10.1007/s00068-013-0269-3. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
5
Prognosis in severe brain injury.严重脑损伤的预后。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Apr;41(4):1104-23. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318287ee79.
6
Assessment of white matter injury and outcome in severe brain trauma: a prospective multicenter cohort.评估严重脑外伤中的脑白质损伤和预后:一项前瞻性多中心队列研究。
Anesthesiology. 2012 Dec;117(6):1300-10. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182755558.
7
Prediction of outcome after traumatic brain injury using clinical and neuroimaging variables.应用临床和神经影像学变量预测创伤性脑损伤的转归。
J Clin Neurol. 2012 Sep;8(3):224-9. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2012.8.3.224. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
8
Multivariate outcome prediction in traumatic brain injury with focus on laboratory values.颅脑损伤的多变量结局预测,重点关注实验室指标。
J Neurotrauma. 2012 Nov 20;29(17):2613-24. doi: 10.1089/neu.2012.2468. Epub 2012 Nov 14.
9
Comparing model performance for survival prediction using total Glasgow Coma Scale and its components in traumatic brain injury.比较创伤性脑损伤中使用格拉斯哥昏迷量表及其各分量预测生存的模型性能。
J Neurotrauma. 2013 Jan 1;30(1):17-22. doi: 10.1089/neu.2012.2438. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
10
Prediction of outcome after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: external validation of the International Mission on Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials (IMPACT) and Corticoid Randomisation After Significant Head injury (CRASH) prognostic models.中重度创伤性脑损伤预后预测:国际预后和临床试验分析使命(IMPACT)及大剂量皮质类固醇治疗严重颅脑外伤(CRASH)预后模型的外部验证。
Crit Care Med. 2012 May;40(5):1609-17. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31824519ce.