Singh Taranjit, Harding Richard
Department of Medical Oncology & Haematology, Artemis Health Sciences Institute, Sector 51, Gurgaon, Haryana, 122001, India.
Department of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, UK.
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Apr 30;8:172. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1102-3.
The increasing incidence of cancer and chronic diseases in South Asia has created a growing public health and clinical need for palliative care in the region. As an emerging discipline with increasing coverage, palliative care must be guided by evidence. In order to appraise the state of the science and inform policy and best practice in South Asia this study aimed to systematically review the evidence for palliative care models, interventions, and outcomes.
The search identified only 16 articles, reporting a small range of services. The 16 articles identified India as having greatest number of papers (n = 14) within South Asia, largely focused in the state of Kerala. Nepal and Pakistan reported a single study each, with nothing from Bhutan, Afghanistan, Maldives or Bangladesh. Despite the large population of South Asia, we found only 4 studies reporting intervention outcomes, with the remaining reporting service descriptions (n = 12).
The dearth of evidence in terms of palliative care outcomes, and the lack of data from beyond India, highlight the urgent need for greater research investment and activity to guide the development of feasible, acceptable, appropriate and effective palliative care services. There is some evidence that suggests implementation of successful and well-developed community based models of palliative care may be replicated in other resource limited settings. Greater investigation to determine outcomes and costs are urgently needed, and require well-designed and validated tools to measure outcomes. Studies are also needed to better understand the cultural context of death and dying for patients and their families in South Asia, and to respond to the growing need for palliative and end-of-life care in the region.
南亚地区癌症和慢性病发病率不断上升,使得该地区对姑息治疗的公共卫生和临床需求日益增长。作为一个覆盖面不断扩大的新兴学科,姑息治疗必须以证据为指导。为了评估南亚地区的科学现状并为政策和最佳实践提供参考,本研究旨在系统回顾姑息治疗模式、干预措施及结果的相关证据。
检索仅发现16篇文章,报道的服务范围有限。这16篇文章表明,印度是南亚地区论文数量最多的国家(n = 14),主要集中在喀拉拉邦。尼泊尔和巴基斯坦各报道了一项研究,不丹、阿富汗、马尔代夫或孟加拉国则没有相关报道。尽管南亚人口众多,但我们仅发现4项研究报告了干预结果,其余12项报告的是服务描述。
姑息治疗结果方面证据匮乏,且缺乏印度以外地区的数据,这凸显了加大研究投入和开展更多研究活动的迫切需求,以指导可行、可接受、适当且有效的姑息治疗服务的发展。有证据表明,成功且成熟的社区姑息治疗模式的实施或许可在其他资源有限的环境中复制。迫切需要进行更多调查以确定结果和成本,这需要精心设计和验证的工具来衡量结果。还需要开展研究,以更好地了解南亚地区患者及其家庭面对死亡的文化背景,并应对该地区对姑息治疗和临终关怀日益增长的需求。