• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

量化文字之美:神经认知诗学视角

Quantifying the Beauty of Words: A Neurocognitive Poetics Perspective.

作者信息

Jacobs Arthur M

机构信息

Department of Experimental and Neurocognitive Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany.

Dahlem Institute for Neuroimaging of Emotion, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Dec 19;11:622. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00622. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00622
PMID:29311877
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5742167/
Abstract

In this paper I would like to pave the ground for future studies in Computational Stylistics and (Neuro-)Cognitive Poetics by describing procedures for predicting the subjective beauty of words. A set of eight tentative word features is computed via Quantitative Narrative Analysis (QNA) and a novel metric for quantifying word beauty, the is proposed. Application of machine learning algorithms fed with this QNA data shows that a classifier of the decision tree family excellently learns to split words into beautiful vs. ugly ones. The results shed light on surface and semantic features theoretically relevant for affective-aesthetic processes in literary reading and generate quantitative predictions for neuroaesthetic studies of verbal materials.

摘要

在本文中,我希望通过描述预测词语主观美感的程序,为计算文体学和(神经)认知诗学的未来研究奠定基础。通过定量叙事分析(QNA)计算出一组八个暂定的词语特征,并提出了一种用于量化词语美感的新指标。将机器学习算法应用于这些QNA数据表明,决策树家族的分类器能够出色地学会将词语分为优美与丑陋两类。这些结果揭示了与文学阅读中的情感审美过程理论相关的表面和语义特征,并为言语材料的神经美学研究生成了定量预测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e221/5742167/d730da0fa296/fnhum-11-00622-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e221/5742167/d730da0fa296/fnhum-11-00622-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e221/5742167/d730da0fa296/fnhum-11-00622-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantifying the Beauty of Words: A Neurocognitive Poetics Perspective.量化文字之美:神经认知诗学视角
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Dec 19;11:622. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00622. eCollection 2017.
2
Corrigendum: Quantifying the Beauty of Words: A Neurocognitive Poetics Perspective.勘误:量化文字之美:一种神经认知诗学视角。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Jan 30;12:12. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00012. eCollection 2018.
3
Sentiment Analysis for Words and Fiction Characters From the Perspective of Computational (Neuro-)Poetics.从计算(神经)诗学视角看词语与虚构人物的情感分析
Front Robot AI. 2019 Jul 17;6:53. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2019.00053. eCollection 2019.
4
10 years of BAWLing into affective and aesthetic processes in reading: what are the echoes?十年来对阅读中情感与审美过程的大声疾呼:有哪些反响?
Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 3;6:714. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00714. eCollection 2015.
5
On Elementary Affective Decisions: To Like Or Not to Like, That Is the Question.论基本情感决策:喜欢还是不喜欢,这是个问题。
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 24;7:1836. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01836. eCollection 2016.
6
Neurocognitive poetics: methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception.神经认知诗学:研究文学接受的神经元和认知情感基础的方法和模型。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Apr 16;9:186. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00186. eCollection 2015.
7
Micropoetry Meets Neurocognitive Poetics: Influence of Associations on the Reception of Poetry.微观诗歌与神经认知诗学:联想对诗歌接受的影响
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 20;12:737756. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.737756. eCollection 2021.
8
Following in Jakobson and Lévi-Strauss' footsteps: A neurocognitive poetics investigation of eye movements during the reading of Baudelaire's 'Les Chats'.追随雅各布森和列维-斯特劳斯的脚步:对阅读波德莱尔的《猫》时眼球运动的神经认知诗学研究。
J Eye Mov Res. 2020 May 11;13(3). doi: 10.16910/jemr.13.3.4. eCollection 2020.
9
One hundred years of neurosciences in the arts and humanities, a bibliometric review.神经科学在艺术和人文学科中的百年发展:文献计量学回顾
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2023 Nov 9;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13010-023-00147-3.
10
(Neuro)Aesthetics: Beauty, ugliness, and ethics.(神经)美学:美、丑与伦理。
Psych J. 2022 Oct;11(5):619-627. doi: 10.1002/pchj.478. Epub 2021 Aug 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting subjective ratings of affect and comprehensibility with text features: a reader response study of narrative poetry.利用文本特征预测情感和可理解性的主观评分:叙事诗歌的读者反应研究
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 8;15:1431764. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1431764. eCollection 2024.
2
Beyond the words: Exploring individual differences in the evaluation of poetic creativity.超越言语:探索诗歌创造力评价中的个体差异。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 3;19(10):e0307298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307298. eCollection 2024.
3
Computational Models of Readers' Apperceptive Mass.

本文引用的文献

1
Neurofunctionally dissecting the reading system in children.从神经功能角度剖析儿童阅读系统。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Oct;27:45-57. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
2
On the Relation between the General Affective Meaning and the Basic Sublexical, Lexical, and Inter-lexical Features of Poetic Texts-A Case Study Using 57 Poems of H. M. Enzensberger.论诗歌文本的一般情感意义与基本次词汇、词汇及词汇间特征的关系——以汉斯·马格努斯·恩岑斯贝格尔的57首诗歌为例的研究
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 11;7:2073. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02073. eCollection 2016.
3
On Elementary Affective Decisions: To Like Or Not to Like, That Is the Question.
读者统觉团的计算模型
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Feb 22;5:718690. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.718690. eCollection 2022.
4
Aesthetic appraisals of literary style and emotional intensity in narrative engagement are neurally dissociable.审美评价文学风格和叙事参与中的情感强度在神经上是可分离的。
Commun Biol. 2021 Dec 16;4(1):1401. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02926-0.
5
Eye movements and mental imagery during reading of literary texts with different narrative styles.阅读不同叙事风格文学文本时的眼动与心理意象
J Eye Mov Res. 2020 Mar 30;13(3). doi: 10.16910/jemr.13.3.3.
6
Reading Shakespeare Sonnets: Combining Quantitative Narrative Analysis and Predictive Modeling -an Eye Tracking Study.阅读莎士比亚十四行诗:结合定量叙事分析与预测建模——一项眼动追踪研究
J Eye Mov Res. 2019 Mar 27;12(5). doi: 10.16910/jemr.12.5.2.
7
Neuroimaging of valence decisions in children and adults.儿童和成人情绪决策的神经影像学研究。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Apr;48:100925. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2021.100925. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
8
Sentiment Analysis for Words and Fiction Characters From the Perspective of Computational (Neuro-)Poetics.从计算(神经)诗学视角看词语与虚构人物的情感分析
Front Robot AI. 2019 Jul 17;6:53. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2019.00053. eCollection 2019.
9
Sentiment Analysis of Children and Youth Literature: Is There a Pollyanna Effect?儿童与青少年文学的情感分析:是否存在波莉安娜效应?
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 24;11:574746. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574746. eCollection 2020.
10
From Abstract Symbols to Emotional (In-)Sights: An Eye Tracking Study on the Effects of Emotional Vignettes and Pictures.从抽象符号到情感洞察:关于情感短文和图片效果的眼动追踪研究
Front Psychol. 2020 May 26;11:905. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00905. eCollection 2020.
论基本情感决策:喜欢还是不喜欢,这是个问题。
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 24;7:1836. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01836. eCollection 2016.
4
Mixing positive and negative valence: Affective-semantic integration of bivalent words.混合正价与负价:二价词的情感语义整合
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 5;6:30718. doi: 10.1038/srep30718.
5
The Berlin Affective Word List for Children (kidBAWL): Exploring Processing of Affective Lexical Semantics in the Visual and Auditory Modalities.儿童柏林情感词汇表(kidBAWL):探索视觉和听觉模态下情感词汇语义的加工过程。
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 30;7:969. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00969. eCollection 2016.
6
Caring About Dostoyevsky: The Untapped Potential of Studying Literature.关怀陀思妥耶夫斯基:研究文学的未开发潜力
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Apr;20(4):243-245. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.12.009. Epub 2016 Jan 23.
7
Crossing boundaries: toward a general model of neuroaesthetics.跨越边界:迈向神经美学的通用模型。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Aug 7;9:443. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00443. eCollection 2015.
8
A Primer on Pattern-Based Approaches to fMRI: Principles, Pitfalls, and Perspectives.基于模式的 fMRI 方法概论:原理、陷阱与展望。
Neuron. 2015 Jul 15;87(2):257-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.05.025.
9
Avoid violence, rioting, and outrage; approach celebration, delight, and strength: Using large text corpora to compute valence, arousal, and the basic emotions.避免暴力、骚乱和愤怒;拥抱庆祝、愉悦和力量:利用大型文本语料库计算效价、唤醒度和基本情绪。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(8):1599-622. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.970204. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
10
10 years of BAWLing into affective and aesthetic processes in reading: what are the echoes?十年来对阅读中情感与审美过程的大声疾呼:有哪些反响?
Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 3;6:714. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00714. eCollection 2015.