• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Applying a new concept of embedding qualitative research: an example from a quantitative study of carers of people in later stage dementia.应用一个新的定性研究嵌入概念:来自对晚期痴呆患者照顾者的定量研究的一个例子。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Aug 22;19(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1240-x.
2
A qualitative study of carers' experiences of dementia cafés: a place to feel supported and be yourself.一项关于痴呆症咖啡馆照顾者体验的定性研究:一个能让人感到被支持并做自己的地方。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Jul 25;17(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0559-4.
3
Efficacy and experiences of telephone counselling for informal carers of people with dementia.针对痴呆症患者非正式照料者的电话咨询服务的效果与经验
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 1;2014(9):CD009126. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009126.pub2.
4
Individual cognitive stimulation therapy for dementia: a clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.针对痴呆症的个体认知刺激疗法:一项临床疗效及成本效益的实用、多中心、随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Aug;19(64):1-108. doi: 10.3310/hta19640.
5
6
An embedded qualitative study of the experiences of people with dementia, their caregivers and volunteer older adults who participated in the CREST resilience-building psychosocial intervention.一项关于参与 CREST 韧性建设心理社会干预的痴呆症患者、照护者和老年志愿者的体验的嵌入式定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Sep 25;24(1):780. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05374-7.
7
Carers: The navigators of the maze of care for people with dementia-A qualitative study.照顾者:痴呆症患者护理迷宫的导航者——一项定性研究。
Dementia (London). 2016 Sep;15(5):1112-23. doi: 10.1177/1471301214554930. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
8
Qualitative Study定性研究
9
Everyday decision-making in dementia: findings from a longitudinal interview study of people with dementia and family carers.痴呆症患者的日常决策:一项对痴呆症患者和家庭照顾者进行的纵向访谈研究的结果。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 Jun;25(6):949-61. doi: 10.1017/S1041610213000306. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
10
Persisting gaps in dementia carer wellbeing and education: A qualitative exploration of dementia carer experiences.痴呆症照顾者的健康和教育方面持续存在差距:对痴呆症照顾者体验的定性探索。
J Clin Nurs. 2024 Nov;33(11):4455-4467. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17404. Epub 2024 Aug 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of memory clinics on carers of people living with dementia: An integrative review.记忆门诊对痴呆症患者照料者的影响:一项综合综述。
Dementia (London). 2025 Oct;24(7):1404-1416. doi: 10.1177/14713012251337497. Epub 2025 May 15.
2
Diabetes beliefs, perceived risk and health behaviours: an embedded mixed-methods analysis from the Richmond Stress and Sugar Study.糖尿病认知、感知风险与健康行为:来自里士满压力与糖分研究的嵌入式混合方法分析
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 5;15(2):e089922. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089922.
3
How do quantitative studies involving people with dementia report experiences of standardised data collection? A narrative synthesis of NIHR published studies.涉及痴呆症患者的定量研究如何报告标准化数据收集的经验?基于 NIHR 已发表研究的叙述性综合。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Feb 16;24(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02148-y.
4
Standardised data collection from people with dementia over the telephone: A qualitative study of the experience of DETERMIND programme researchers in a pandemic.电话中对痴呆症患者进行标准化数据收集:DETERMIND 项目研究人员在大流行期间的经验定性研究。
Dementia (London). 2023 Nov;22(8):1718-1737. doi: 10.1177/14713012231190585. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
5
Emergency Departments as Care Providers for Patients with Cardiac Ambulatory Care Sensitive and Mental Health Conditions: Qualitative Interview and Focus Group Study with Patients and Physicians.急诊科作为有心脏门诊护理敏感和心理健康问题的患者的医疗服务提供者:对患者和医生进行定性访谈和焦点小组研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 17;19(10):6098. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106098.
6
Placing assistive technology and telecare in everyday practices of people with dementia and their caregivers: findings from an embedded ethnography of a national dementia trial.将辅助技术和远程护理融入痴呆症患者及其照护者的日常实践中:一项全国性痴呆症试验的嵌入式民族志研究结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Feb 15;21(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01896-y.
7
Day centres for older people - attender characteristics, access routes and outcomes of regular attendance: findings of exploratory mixed methods case study research.老年人日间中心——参加者特征、常规参加途径和效果:探索性混合方法案例研究结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 May 4;20(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01529-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Informal caregivers' views on the division of responsibilities between themselves and professionals: A scoping review.非正式照料者对自身与专业人员之间责任划分的看法:一项范围综述。
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 Jul;26(4):e460-e473. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12529. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
2
Overview of systematic reviews: Effective home support in dementia care, components and impacts-Stage 1, psychosocial interventions for dementia.系统评价概述:痴呆症护理中的有效家庭支持、组成部分和影响 - 第 1 阶段,痴呆症的心理社会干预。
J Adv Nurs. 2017 Dec;73(12):2845-2863. doi: 10.1111/jan.13362. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
3
Evaluating the effectiveness of different approaches to home support for people in later stage dementia: a protocol for an observational study.评估不同方法对晚期痴呆患者家庭支持效果的研究:一项观察性研究方案。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Jul;29(7):1213-1221. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217000291. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
4
Effective public involvement in the HoST-D Programme for dementia home care support: From proposal and design to methods of data collection (innovative practice).有效公众参与 HoST-D 痴呆家庭护理支持计划:从提案和设计到数据收集方法(创新实践)。
Dementia (London). 2019 Oct-Nov;18(7-8):3173-3186. doi: 10.1177/1471301216687698. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
5
The worldwide costs of dementia 2015 and comparisons with 2010.2015年全球痴呆症成本及与2010年的比较。
Alzheimers Dement. 2017 Jan;13(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.07.150. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
6
Hearing Their Voice: A Systematic Review of Dementia Family Caregivers' Needs.倾听他们的声音:痴呆症家庭照顾者需求的系统评价
Gerontologist. 2016 Oct;56(5):e70-88. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw078. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
7
The agentic person: shifting the focus of care.能动之人:转变护理重点。
Aging Ment Health. 2016 Aug;20(8):771-2. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2016.1146873. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
8
Successful collaboration in dementia care from the perspectives of healthcare professionals and informal carers in Germany: results from a focus group study.德国医疗保健专业人员和非正式护理人员视角下痴呆症护理的成功协作:焦点小组研究结果
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 May 28;15:208. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0875-3.
9
Qualitative studies of psychosocial interventions for dementia: a systematic review.痴呆症心理社会干预的定性研究:一项系统综述。
Aging Ment Health. 2015;19(11):955-67. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2015.1011079. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
10
Self-efficacy and health-related quality of life in family carers of people with dementia: a systematic review.痴呆症患者家庭照料者的自我效能感与健康相关生活质量:一项系统综述
Aging Ment Health. 2014;18(8):954-69. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2014.915921. Epub 2014 Jun 19.

应用一个新的定性研究嵌入概念:来自对晚期痴呆患者照顾者的定量研究的一个例子。

Applying a new concept of embedding qualitative research: an example from a quantitative study of carers of people in later stage dementia.

机构信息

Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2019 Aug 22;19(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1240-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-019-1240-x
PMID:31438867
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6704652/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Qualitative methods are increasingly included in larger studies to provide a richer understanding of people's experience. This paper explores the potential of using a novel approach to embedded qualitative design as part of an observational study examining the effectiveness of home support for people in later stage dementia in England. The method involved collecting and analysing unsolicited conversational comments made by participants as they completed standardised measures. An evaluation of the method is presented using the voices of participants to illustrate its potential.

METHODS

The conversations of 17 carers recruited to an observational study were audio recorded to gather commentary made while completing a structured interview. Data were interrogated using thematic analysis to investigate the feasibility of conducting an embedded qualitative study, the potential richness of the material and participants' reactions to formal questioning and participating in research.

RESULTS

The findings revealed that qualitative data were available from this approach. Analysis generated three themes from carers: conflicting carer emotions; the importance of maintaining normality and agency within day-to-day life; and tensions between these desires and making use of formal services. Important issues for carers were revealed establishing the benefit of using the method. The advantages of exploiting unsolicited conversation included enhancing understanding of people's lived experience, reducing participant burden in research and easing the process of data collection. In addition, it provided an opportunity to evaluate individuals' experience of the research process.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings demonstrate how unsolicited comments during structured interviews may appear incidental but can reveal important aspects of living with dementia. The method also emphasised methodological challenges for research in dementia, including the influence and impact of the research context. Further research is required to evaluate the method with other groups including people with dementia themselves.

摘要

背景

定性方法越来越多地被纳入更大的研究中,以更深入地了解人们的体验。本文探讨了在观察性研究中使用一种新的嵌入式定性设计方法的潜力,该研究旨在评估英格兰为晚期痴呆症患者提供家庭支持的效果。该方法涉及收集和分析参与者在完成标准化测量时的非请求性对话评论。本文通过参与者的声音来评估该方法的有效性,以说明其潜力。

方法

本研究招募了 17 名护理人员参与观察性研究,对他们完成结构化访谈时的对话进行录音,以收集评论。使用主题分析来检查嵌入式定性研究的可行性、材料的潜在丰富性以及参与者对正式提问和参与研究的反应。

结果

研究结果表明,这种方法可以提供定性数据。分析从护理人员中得出了三个主题:护理人员的矛盾情绪;在日常生活中保持正常和自主性的重要性;以及这些愿望与利用正式服务之间的紧张关系。这些问题揭示了护理人员的重要关注点,为使用该方法带来了好处。利用非请求性对话的优势包括增强对人们生活体验的理解、减轻研究中参与者的负担以及简化数据收集过程。此外,它还提供了一个评估个体对研究过程体验的机会。

结论

研究结果表明,在结构化访谈中出现的非请求性评论可能看起来是偶然的,但可以揭示出与痴呆症相关的重要方面。该方法还强调了痴呆症研究中的方法论挑战,包括研究背景的影响和作用。需要进一步研究来评估该方法在其他群体中的效果,包括痴呆症患者本身。