Mathew Sarah, Perreault Charles
School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA Institute of Human Origins, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA Institute of Human Origins, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Jul 7;282(1810). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0061.
The behavioural variation among human societies is vast and unmatched in the animal world. It is unclear whether this variation is due to variation in the ecological environment or to differences in cultural traditions. Underlying this debate is a more fundamental question: is the richness of humans' behavioural repertoire due to non-cultural mechanisms, such as causal reasoning, inventiveness, reaction norms, trial-and-error learning and evoked culture, or is it due to the population-level dynamics of cultural transmission? Here, we measure the relative contribution of environment and cultural history in explaining the behavioural variation of 172 Native American tribes at the time of European contact. We find that the effect of cultural history is typically larger than that of environment. Behaviours also persist over millennia within cultural lineages. This indicates that human behaviour is not predominantly determined by single-generation adaptive responses, contra theories that emphasize non-cultural mechanisms as determinants of human behaviour. Rather, the main mode of human adaptation is social learning mechanisms that operate over multiple generations.
人类社会之间的行为差异巨大,在动物世界中无与伦比。目前尚不清楚这种差异是由于生态环境的差异还是文化传统的不同。这场辩论的背后是一个更基本的问题:人类行为库的丰富性是由于非文化机制,如因果推理、创造力、反应规范、试错学习和诱发文化,还是由于文化传播的群体层面动态?在这里,我们衡量环境和文化历史在解释欧洲人接触时172个美洲原住民部落的行为差异方面的相对贡献。我们发现,文化历史的影响通常大于环境的影响。行为在文化谱系中也会持续数千年。这表明,人类行为并非主要由单代适应性反应决定,这与强调非文化机制是人类行为决定因素的理论相悖。相反,人类适应的主要模式是跨多代运作的社会学习机制。