James Lisa M, Engdahl Brian E, Leuthold Arthur C, Krueger Robert F, Georgopoulos Apostolos P
Brain Sciences Center, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Dec;233(12):3543-52. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4406-6. Epub 2015 Aug 30.
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), includes an empirically supported dimensional model of personality pathology that is assessed via the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5). Here we used magnetoencephalography (MEG; 248 sensors) to evaluate resting-state neural network properties associated with the five primary DSM-5 maladaptive personality domains (negative affect, detachment, antagonism, disinhibition, and psychoticism) in 150 healthy veterans ("control" group) and 179 veterans with various psychiatric disorders ("psychopathology" group). Since a fundamental network property is the strength of functional connectivity among network elements, we used the absolute value of the pairwise correlation coefficient (aCC) between prewhitened MEG sensor time series as a measure of neural functional connectivity and assessed its relations to the quantitative PID-5 scores in a linear regression model, where the log-transformed aCC was the dependent variable and individual PID scores, age, and gender were the independent variables. The partial regression coefficient (pRC) for a specific PID-5 score in that model provided information concerning the direction (positive, negative) and size (absolute value) of the PID effect on the strength of neural correlations. We found that, overall, PID domains had a negative effect (i.e., negative pRC; decorrelation) on aCC in the control group, but a positive one (i.e., positive pRC; hyper-correlation) in the psychopathology group. This dissociation of PID effects on aCC was especially pronounced for disinhibition, psychoticism, and negative affect. These results document for the first time a fundamental difference in neural-PID relations between control and psychopathology groups.
《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM - 5)包含一个基于实证的人格病理学维度模型,该模型通过《DSM - 5人格量表》(PID - 5)进行评估。在此,我们使用脑磁图(MEG;248个传感器)来评估150名健康退伍军人(“对照组”)和179名患有各种精神疾病的退伍军人(“精神病理学组”)中与DSM - 5五个主要适应不良人格领域(消极情感、脱离、敌对、放纵和精神质)相关的静息态神经网络特性。由于一个基本的网络特性是网络元素之间功能连接的强度,我们使用预处理后的MEG传感器时间序列之间的成对相关系数(aCC)的绝对值作为神经功能连接的度量,并在一个线性回归模型中评估其与定量PID - 5分数的关系,其中对数转换后的aCC是因变量,个体PID分数、年龄和性别是自变量。该模型中特定PID - 5分数的偏回归系数(pRC)提供了关于PID对神经相关性强度影响的方向(正、负)和大小(绝对值)的信息。我们发现,总体而言,PID领域在对照组中对aCC有负面影响(即负pRC;去相关),但在精神病理学组中有正面影响(即正pRC;超相关)。PID对aCC影响的这种分离在放纵、精神质和消极情感方面尤为明显。这些结果首次证明了对照组和精神病理学组之间神经 - PID关系的根本差异。