• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

病理性人格特质调节神经相互作用。

Pathological personality traits modulate neural interactions.

作者信息

James Lisa M, Engdahl Brian E, Leuthold Arthur C, Krueger Robert F, Georgopoulos Apostolos P

机构信息

Brain Sciences Center, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2015 Dec;233(12):3543-52. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4406-6. Epub 2015 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1007/s00221-015-4406-6
PMID:26319544
Abstract

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), includes an empirically supported dimensional model of personality pathology that is assessed via the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5). Here we used magnetoencephalography (MEG; 248 sensors) to evaluate resting-state neural network properties associated with the five primary DSM-5 maladaptive personality domains (negative affect, detachment, antagonism, disinhibition, and psychoticism) in 150 healthy veterans ("control" group) and 179 veterans with various psychiatric disorders ("psychopathology" group). Since a fundamental network property is the strength of functional connectivity among network elements, we used the absolute value of the pairwise correlation coefficient (aCC) between prewhitened MEG sensor time series as a measure of neural functional connectivity and assessed its relations to the quantitative PID-5 scores in a linear regression model, where the log-transformed aCC was the dependent variable and individual PID scores, age, and gender were the independent variables. The partial regression coefficient (pRC) for a specific PID-5 score in that model provided information concerning the direction (positive, negative) and size (absolute value) of the PID effect on the strength of neural correlations. We found that, overall, PID domains had a negative effect (i.e., negative pRC; decorrelation) on aCC in the control group, but a positive one (i.e., positive pRC; hyper-correlation) in the psychopathology group. This dissociation of PID effects on aCC was especially pronounced for disinhibition, psychoticism, and negative affect. These results document for the first time a fundamental difference in neural-PID relations between control and psychopathology groups.

摘要

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM - 5)包含一个基于实证的人格病理学维度模型,该模型通过《DSM - 5人格量表》(PID - 5)进行评估。在此,我们使用脑磁图(MEG;248个传感器)来评估150名健康退伍军人(“对照组”)和179名患有各种精神疾病的退伍军人(“精神病理学组”)中与DSM - 5五个主要适应不良人格领域(消极情感、脱离、敌对、放纵和精神质)相关的静息态神经网络特性。由于一个基本的网络特性是网络元素之间功能连接的强度,我们使用预处理后的MEG传感器时间序列之间的成对相关系数(aCC)的绝对值作为神经功能连接的度量,并在一个线性回归模型中评估其与定量PID - 5分数的关系,其中对数转换后的aCC是因变量,个体PID分数、年龄和性别是自变量。该模型中特定PID - 5分数的偏回归系数(pRC)提供了关于PID对神经相关性强度影响的方向(正、负)和大小(绝对值)的信息。我们发现,总体而言,PID领域在对照组中对aCC有负面影响(即负pRC;去相关),但在精神病理学组中有正面影响(即正pRC;超相关)。PID对aCC影响的这种分离在放纵、精神质和消极情感方面尤为明显。这些结果首次证明了对照组和精神病理学组之间神经 - PID关系的根本差异。

相似文献

1
Pathological personality traits modulate neural interactions.病理性人格特质调节神经相互作用。
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Dec;233(12):3543-52. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4406-6. Epub 2015 Aug 30.
2
DSM-5 personality traits discriminate between posttraumatic stress disorder and control groups.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版中的人格特质能够区分创伤后应激障碍患者组和对照组。
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Jul;233(7):2021-8. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4273-1. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
3
A Family Study of the Section III Personality Pathology Model Using the Personality Inventory for the (PID-5).采用《人格障碍检查表第五版》(PID-5)对 第三节人格病理学模型进行的家系研究。
J Pers Disord. 2018 Dec;32(6):753-765. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2017_31_323. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
4
Evaluation of DSM-5 and ICD-11 personality traits using the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in a Brazilian sample of psychiatric inpatients.使用 DSM-5 人格量表(PID-5)在巴西精神科住院患者样本中评估 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 人格特质。
Personal Ment Health. 2019 Feb;13(1):24-39. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1436. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
5
Integrating normal and pathological personality: relating the DSM-5 trait-dimensional model to general traits of personality.整合正常与病理人格:将 DSM-5 特质维度模型与人格的一般特质联系起来。
Assessment. 2013 Jun;20(3):312-26. doi: 10.1177/1073191113485810. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
6
General and maladaptive traits in a five-factor framework for DSM-5 in a university student sample.DSM-5 五因素框架中大学生样本的一般和适应不良特征。
Assessment. 2013 Jun;20(3):295-307. doi: 10.1177/1073191113475808. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
7
ICD-11 and DSM-5 personality trait domains capture categorical personality disorders: Finding a common ground.《ICD-11 和 DSM-5 人格特质领域能否涵盖类别性人格障碍:寻找共同点》
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2018 May;52(5):425-434. doi: 10.1177/0004867417727867. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
8
Utility of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form (PID-5-BF) in the Measurement of Maladaptive Personality and Psychopathology.DSM-5 简明人格量表(PID-5-BF)在测量适应不良人格和精神病理学中的效用。
Assessment. 2018 Jul;25(5):596-607. doi: 10.1177/1073191116676889. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
9
Relations between facets and personality domains with impulsivity: New evidence using the DSM-5 Section III framework in patients with substance use disorders.物质使用障碍患者使用 DSM-5 第三版块框架得出的冲动性与方面和人格领域关系的新证据。
Personal Disord. 2018 Sep;9(5):490-495. doi: 10.1037/per0000278. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
10
DSM-5 alternative personality disorder model traits as maladaptive extreme variants of the five-factor model: An item-response theory analysis.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版中替代人格障碍模型特质作为五因素模型的适应不良极端变体:一项项目反应理论分析
J Abnorm Psychol. 2015 May;124(2):343-54. doi: 10.1037/abn0000035. Epub 2015 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Using the alternative model of personality disorders for DSM-5 traits to identify personality types, and the relationship with disordered eating, depression, anxiety and stress.使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)人格特质的替代人格障碍模型来识别性格类型,以及与饮食失调、抑郁、焦虑和压力的关系。
J Eat Disord. 2025 Feb 7;13(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01204-2.
2
Identifying overcontrol and undercontrol personality types among young people using the five factor model, and the relationship with disordered eating behaviour, anxiety and depression.使用五因素模型识别年轻人中的过度控制和控制不足人格类型,以及与饮食失调行为、焦虑和抑郁的关系。
J Eat Disord. 2024 Jan 24;12(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40337-024-00967-4.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Neural communication in posttraumatic growth.创伤后成长中的神经通讯
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Jul;233(7):2013-20. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4272-2. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
2
DSM-5 alternative personality disorder model traits as maladaptive extreme variants of the five-factor model: An item-response theory analysis.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版中替代人格障碍模型特质作为五因素模型的适应不良极端变体:一项项目反应理论分析
J Abnorm Psychol. 2015 May;124(2):343-54. doi: 10.1037/abn0000035. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
3
Reliability and validity of the personality inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): predicting DSM-IV personality disorders and psychopathy in community-dwelling Italian adults.
Dimensional personality pathology and disordered eating in young adults: measuring the DSM-5 alternative model using the PID-5.
青年成人的维度性人格病理学与饮食失调:使用人格障碍诊断问卷-5(PID-5)测量《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版替代模型
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 26;14:1113142. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1113142. eCollection 2023.
4
Brain network topology and personality traits: A source level magnetoencephalographic study.脑网络拓扑与人格特质:源水平脑磁图研究。
Scand J Psychol. 2022 Oct;63(5):495-503. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12835. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
5
Gulf War Illness: Mechanisms Underlying Brain Dysfunction and Promising Therapeutic Strategies.海湾战争病:脑功能障碍的潜在机制和有前景的治疗策略。
Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Apr;220:107716. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2020.107716. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
6
A Brief but Comprehensive Review of Research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders.DSM-5 人格障碍替代模型研究的简要但全面的综述。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Aug 13;21(9):92. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1079-z.
7
Gulf War illness (GWI) as a neuroimmune disease.海湾战争综合征作为一种神经免疫疾病。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Oct;235(10):3217-3225. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-5050-0. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
8
Brain Correlates of Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Protection in Gulf War Illness (GWI).海湾战争综合征(GWI)中人类白细胞抗原(HLA)保护作用的脑关联
EBioMedicine. 2016 Nov;13:72-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.10.019. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
DSM-5 人格量表(PID-5)的信度和效度:预测社区居住的意大利成年人群体中 DSM-IV 人格障碍和精神病态。
Assessment. 2013 Dec;20(6):689-708. doi: 10.1177/1073191113504984. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
4
The Big Five default brain: functional evidence.五大默认脑区:功能证据
Brain Struct Funct. 2014 Nov;219(6):1913-22. doi: 10.1007/s00429-013-0610-y. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
5
The development and psychometric properties of an informant-report form of the personality inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5).DSM-5 人格障碍检查表自评报告形式的编制与心理计量特性。
Assessment. 2013 Jun;20(3):370-83. doi: 10.1177/1073191113486513. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
6
The psychometric properties of the personality inventory for DSM-5 in an APA DSM-5 field trial sample.DSM-5 人格量表在 APA DSM-5 现场试验样本中的心理计量特性。
Assessment. 2013 Jun;20(3):362-9. doi: 10.1177/1073191113486183. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
7
Resting parietal EEG asymmetry and cardiac vagal tone predict attentional control.静息顶叶 EEG 不对称性和心脏迷走神经张力预测注意力控制。
Biol Psychol. 2013 May;93(2):257-61. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.02.012. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
8
Neural network modulation by trauma as a marker of resilience: differences between veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder and resilient controls.创伤对神经网络的调节作用作为韧性的标志物:创伤后应激障碍退伍军人和有韧性对照者之间的差异。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;70(4):410-8. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.878.
9
General and maladaptive traits in a five-factor framework for DSM-5 in a university student sample.DSM-5 五因素框架中大学生样本的一般和适应不良特征。
Assessment. 2013 Jun;20(3):295-307. doi: 10.1177/1073191113475808. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
10
On the convergence between PSY-5 domains and PID-5 domains and facets: implications for assessment of DSM-5 personality traits.PSY-5 领域与 PID-5 领域和方面的趋同:对 DSM-5 人格特质评估的影响。
Assessment. 2013 Jun;20(3):286-94. doi: 10.1177/1073191112471141. Epub 2013 Jan 7.