Suppr超能文献

EX-PRESS青光眼滤过装置:疗效、安全性及可预测性。

EX-PRESS Glaucoma Filtration Device: efficacy, safety, and predictability.

作者信息

Chan Jessica E, Netland Peter A

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

出版信息

Med Devices (Auckl). 2015 Sep 2;8:381-8. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S63350. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Trabeculectomy has been the traditional primary surgical therapy for open-angle glaucoma. While trabeculectomy is effective in lowering intraocular pressure, complications associated with the procedure have motivated the development of alternative techniques and devices, including the EX-PRESS Glaucoma Filtration Device. This review describes the efficacy, safety, complication rates, and potential advantages and disadvantages of the EX-PRESS Glaucoma Filtration Device. EX-PRESS implantation is technically simpler compared with that of trabeculectomy, with fewer surgical steps. Vision recovery has been more rapid after EX-PRESS implantation compared with trabeculectomy. Intraocular pressure variation is lower during the early postoperative period, indicating a more predictable procedure. While efficacy of the EX-PRESS implant has been comparable to trabeculectomy, postoperative complications appear less common after EX-PRESS implantation compared with trabeculectomy. The EX-PRESS Glaucoma Filtration Device appears to be safe and effective in the surgical management of open-angle glaucoma.

摘要

小梁切除术一直是开角型青光眼的传统主要手术治疗方法。虽然小梁切除术在降低眼压方面有效,但与该手术相关的并发症促使了包括EX-PRESS青光眼滤过装置在内的替代技术和器械的发展。本综述描述了EX-PRESS青光眼滤过装置的疗效、安全性、并发症发生率以及潜在的优缺点。与小梁切除术相比,EX-PRESS植入术在技术上更简单,手术步骤更少。与小梁切除术相比,EX-PRESS植入术后视力恢复更快。术后早期眼压变化更小,表明手术更可预测。虽然EX-PRESS植入物的疗效与小梁切除术相当,但与小梁切除术相比,EX-PRESS植入术后的并发症似乎更少见。EX-PRESS青光眼滤过装置在开角型青光眼的手术治疗中似乎是安全有效的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bfd/4562650/e5e2c7a33101/mder-8-381Fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验