Sridevi Ugrappa, Jain Ajay, Nagalaxmi Velpula, Kumar Ugrappa Vijay, Goyal Stuti
Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, AIMST Dental Institute, AIMST University, Kedah, Malaysia.
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, AIMST Dental Institute, AIMST University, Kedah, Malaysia.
Eur J Dent. 2015 Jul-Sep;9(3):364-372. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.163238.
The aim of the present study was to assess the expression of E-cad in oral precancerous lesions and conditions and oral carcinomas in comparison with normal mucosa.
Total of 50 samples were selected for the study and were categorized into five groups and 10 samples in each group as Group I-oral leukoplakia (OL), Group II-oral lichen planus (OLP), Group III-oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF), Group IV-oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and Group V-normal oral mucosa (NOM) as control group. All the samples were assessed for the expression of E-cad by immunohistochemical study.
Upon assessing the expression of E-cad in OL, OSMF, OLP and OSCC, as majority of the samples with OSCC (90%), OL (80%), OLP (70%) and OSMF (60%) showed mild to moderate expression of E-cad staining, which was suggestive of reduction in dysplastic cells on comparison to NOM cells. This difference in expression and variation of E-cad upon comparison with normal mucosa was statistically significant (P < 0.001).
There is significant (P < 0.001) variation of expression of E-cad with the histopathological dysplasia of the oral precancerous lesions and conditions, and the tumor differentiation of the oral cancers. However, there was no correlation of the degree of loss of expression of E-cad with the degree of dysplasia or the tumor differentiation of oral cancers. We conclude with our study that, there is a variation in the expression of E-cad but its value as a prognostic marker is questionable.
本研究旨在评估E-cad在口腔癌前病变及状况和口腔癌中的表达,并与正常黏膜进行比较。
共选取50个样本进行研究,分为五组,每组10个样本,即第一组-口腔白斑(OL),第二组-口腔扁平苔藓(OLP),第三组-口腔黏膜下纤维化(OSMF),第四组-口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC),第五组-正常口腔黏膜(NOM)作为对照组。通过免疫组织化学研究评估所有样本中E-cad的表达。
评估OL、OSMF、OLP和OSCC中E-cad的表达时,大多数OSCC样本(90%)、OL样本(80%)、OLP样本(70%)和OSMF样本(60%)显示E-cad染色呈轻度至中度表达,这表明与NOM细胞相比,发育异常细胞减少。与正常黏膜相比,E-cad表达的这种差异和变化具有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。
E-cad的表达与口腔癌前病变及状况的组织病理学发育异常和口腔癌的肿瘤分化存在显著(P < 0.001)差异。然而,E-cad表达缺失程度与口腔癌发育异常程度或肿瘤分化程度之间没有相关性。我们通过研究得出结论,E-cad的表达存在差异,但其作为预后标志物的价值值得怀疑。