Goldberg Simon B, Wielgosz Joseph, Dahl Cortland, Schuyler Brianna, MacCoon Donal S, Rosenkranz Melissa, Lutz Antoine, Sebranek Chad A, Davidson Richard J
Center for Investigating Healthy Minds at Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Psychol Assess. 2016 Aug;28(8):1009-14. doi: 10.1037/pas0000233. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
The current study attempted a rigorous test of the construct validity of a widely used self-report measure of dispositional mindfulness, the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), within the context of an active controlled randomized trial (n = 130). The trial included three arms: mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), an active control condition that did not include instruction in mindfulness meditation (Health Enhancement Program [HEP]), and a waitlist control condition. Partial evidence for the convergent validity of the FFMQ was shown in correlations at baseline between FFMQ facets and measures of psychological symptoms and psychological well-being. In addition, facets of the FFMQ were shown to increase over the course of an MBSR intervention relative to a waitlist control condition. However, the FFMQ failed to show discriminant validity. Specifically, facets of the FFMQ were shown to increase over the course of the HEP intervention relative to the waitlist control condition. MBSR and HEP, in contrast, did not differ in changes in FFMQ score over time. Implications of these findings for the measurement and theory of mindfulness and MBSR are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record
本研究在一项积极对照随机试验（n = 130）的背景下，对广泛使用的特质正念自我报告量表——五因素正念问卷（FFMQ）的结构效度进行了严格检验。该试验包括三个组：基于正念的减压疗法（MBSR）、不包括正念冥想指导的积极对照条件（健康促进计划[HEP]）以及等待名单对照条件。FFMQ各维度与心理症状和心理健康测量指标在基线时的相关性显示了FFMQ收敛效度的部分证据。此外，相对于等待名单对照条件，FFMQ的各维度在MBSR干预过程中有所增加。然而，FFMQ未能显示出区分效度。具体而言，相对于等待名单对照条件，FFMQ的各维度在HEP干预过程中有所增加。相比之下，MBSR和HEP在FFMQ得分随时间的变化上没有差异。本文讨论了这些发现对正念测量和理论以及MBSR的意义。（PsycINFO数据库记录）
