Nair Anu G, Gutierrez-Arenas Omar, Eriksson Olivia, Vincent Pierre, Hellgren Kotaleski Jeanette
Science for Life Laboratory, School of Computer Science and Communication, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 11428 Stockholm, Sweden, Manipal University, 576104 Manipal, India.
Science for Life Laboratory, School of Computer Science and Communication, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 11428 Stockholm, Sweden,
J Neurosci. 2015 Oct 14;35(41):14017-30. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0730-15.2015.
Transient changes in striatal dopamine (DA) concentration are considered to encode a reward prediction error (RPE) in reinforcement learning tasks. Often, a phasic DA change occurs concomitantly with a dip in striatal acetylcholine (ACh), whereas other neuromodulators, such as adenosine (Adn), change slowly. There are abundant adenylyl cyclase (AC) coupled GPCRs for these neuromodulators in striatal medium spiny neurons (MSNs), which play important roles in plasticity. However, little is known about the interaction between these neuromodulators via GPCRs. The interaction between these transient neuromodulator changes and the effect on cAMP/PKA signaling via Golf- and Gi/o-coupled GPCR are studied here using quantitative kinetic modeling. The simulations suggest that, under basal conditions, cAMP/PKA signaling could be significantly inhibited in D1R+ MSNs via ACh/M4R/Gi/o and an ACh dip is required to gate a subset of D1R/Golf-dependent PKA activation. Furthermore, the interaction between ACh dip and DA peak, via D1R and M4R, is synergistic. In a similar fashion, PKA signaling in D2+ MSNs is under basal inhibition via D2R/Gi/o and a DA dip leads to a PKA increase by disinhibiting A2aR/Golf, but D2+ MSNs could also respond to the DA peak via other intracellular pathways. This study highlights the similarity between the two types of MSNs in terms of high basal AC inhibition by Gi/o and the importance of interactions between Gi/o and Golf signaling, but at the same time predicts differences between them with regard to the sign of RPE responsible for PKA activation.
Dopamine transients are considered to carry reward-related signal in reinforcement learning. An increase in dopamine concentration is associated with an unexpected reward or salient stimuli, whereas a decrease is produced by omission of an expected reward. Often dopamine transients are accompanied by other neuromodulatory signals, such as acetylcholine and adenosine. We highlight the importance of interaction between acetylcholine, dopamine, and adenosine signals via adenylyl-cyclase coupled GPCRs in shaping the dopamine-dependent cAMP/PKA signaling in striatal neurons. Specifically, a dopamine peak and an acetylcholine dip must interact, via D1 and M4 receptor, and a dopamine dip must interact with adenosine tone, via D2 and A2a receptor, in direct and indirect pathway neurons, respectively, to have any significant downstream PKA activation.
纹状体多巴胺(DA)浓度的瞬时变化被认为在强化学习任务中编码奖励预测误差(RPE)。通常,DA的相位性变化与纹状体乙酰胆碱(ACh)的下降同时发生,而其他神经调质,如腺苷(Adn),变化缓慢。在纹状体中等棘状神经元(MSN)中,存在大量与这些神经调质偶联的腺苷酸环化酶(AC)的G蛋白偶联受体(GPCR),它们在可塑性中起重要作用。然而,关于这些神经调质通过GPCR之间的相互作用知之甚少。本文使用定量动力学模型研究了这些瞬时神经调质变化之间的相互作用以及通过Golf和Gi/o偶联GPCR对cAMP/PKA信号传导的影响。模拟结果表明,在基础条件下,D1R+ MSN中的cAMP/PKA信号传导可通过ACh/M4R/Gi/o被显著抑制,并且需要ACh下降来开启一部分D1R/Golf依赖性PKA激活。此外,通过D1R和M4R,ACh下降与DA峰值之间的相互作用是协同的。以类似的方式,D2+ MSN中的PKA信号传导在基础状态下通过D2R/Gi/o受到抑制,DA下降通过解除对A2aR/Golf的抑制导致PKA增加,但D2+ MSN也可通过其他细胞内途径对DA峰值做出反应。本研究强调了两种类型的MSN在通过Gi/o进行高基础AC抑制方面的相似性以及Gi/o和Golf信号传导之间相互作用的重要性,但同时预测了它们在负责PKA激活的RPE信号方面的差异。
多巴胺瞬变被认为在强化学习中携带与奖励相关的信号。多巴胺浓度的增加与意外奖励或显著刺激相关,而减少则是由于预期奖励的缺失所致。多巴胺瞬变通常伴随着其他神经调节信号,如乙酰胆碱和腺苷。我们强调了乙酰胆碱、多巴胺和腺苷信号通过腺苷酸环化酶偶联的GPCR之间的相互作用在塑造纹状体神经元中多巴胺依赖性cAMP/PKA信号传导方面的重要性。具体而言,多巴胺峰值和乙酰胆碱下降必须分别通过D1和M4受体相互作用,多巴胺下降必须通过D2和A2a受体与腺苷张力相互作用,分别在直接和间接通路神经元中,才能产生任何显著的下游PKA激活。