Suppr超能文献

剖析言语产生中的双语成本。

Breaking Down the Bilingual Cost in Speech Production.

作者信息

Sadat Jasmin, Martin Clara D, Magnuson James S, Alario François-Xavier, Costa Albert

机构信息

Department of Information and Communications Technologies, Pompeu Fabra University.

Laboratory of Cognitive Psychology, CNRS and Aix-Marseille University.

出版信息

Cogn Sci. 2016 Nov;40(8):1911-1940. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12315. Epub 2015 Oct 25.

Abstract

Bilinguals have been shown to perform worse than monolinguals in a variety of verbal tasks. This study investigated this bilingual verbal cost in a large-scale picture-naming study conducted in Spanish. We explored how individual characteristics of the participants and the linguistic properties of the words being spoken influence this performance cost. In particular, we focused on the contributions of lexical frequency and phonological similarity across translations. The naming performance of Spanish-Catalan bilinguals speaking in their dominant and non-dominant language was compared to that of Spanish monolinguals. Single trial naming latencies were analyzed by means of linear mixed models accounting for individual effects at the participant and item level. While decreasing lexical frequency was shown to increase naming latencies in all groups, this variable by itself did not account for the bilingual cost. In turn, our results showed that the bilingual cost disappeared when naming words with high phonological similarity across translations. In short, our results show that frequency of use can play a role in the emergence of the bilingual cost, but that phonological similarity across translations should be regarded as one of the most important variables that determine the bilingual cost in speech production. Low phonological similarity across translations yields worse performance in bilinguals and promotes the bilingual cost in naming performance. The implications of our results for the effect of phonological similarity across translations within the bilingual speech production system are discussed.

摘要

双语者在各种语言任务中的表现已被证明比单语者差。本研究在一项以西班牙语进行的大规模图片命名研究中调查了这种双语语言成本。我们探讨了参与者的个体特征以及所讲单词的语言属性如何影响这种表现成本。特别是,我们关注了词汇频率和翻译间语音相似性的作用。将使用其主导语言和非主导语言的西班牙语 - 加泰罗尼亚语双语者的命名表现与西班牙语单语者的进行了比较。通过考虑参与者和项目层面个体效应的线性混合模型分析了单次试验的命名潜伏期。虽然词汇频率降低会导致所有组的命名潜伏期增加,但该变量本身并不能解释双语成本。相反,我们的结果表明,当命名翻译间语音相似度高的单词时,双语成本消失了。简而言之,我们的结果表明,使用频率可能在双语成本的出现中起作用,但翻译间的语音相似性应被视为决定言语产生中双语成本的最重要变量之一。翻译间语音相似度低会导致双语者表现更差,并在命名表现中加剧双语成本。我们讨论了研究结果对双语言语产生系统中翻译间语音相似性影响的意义。

相似文献

1
Breaking Down the Bilingual Cost in Speech Production.
Cogn Sci. 2016 Nov;40(8):1911-1940. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12315. Epub 2015 Oct 25.
2
A robust demonstration of the cognate facilitation effect in first-language and second-language naming.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Jan;141:229-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
3
The Bilingual Switching Advantage: Sometimes Related to Bilingual Proficiency, Sometimes Not.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2015 Aug;21(7):531-44. doi: 10.1017/S1355617715000521.
4
The role of language proficiency, cognate status and word frequency in the assessment of Spanish-English bilinguals' verbal fluency.
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016 Apr;18(2):190-201. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2015.1081288. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
5
What factors influence phonological production in French-speaking bilingual children, aged three to six years?
J Child Lang. 2020 Sep;47(5):945-981. doi: 10.1017/S0305000919000874. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
6
Sensitivity to phonological similarity within and across languages.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2008 May;37(3):141-70. doi: 10.1007/s10936-007-9064-9.
7
Individual variation in bilingual vocabulary in preschoolers with developmental language disorder.
Res Dev Disabil. 2024 Apr;147:104695. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104695. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
8
Phonological acquisition in bilingual Spanish-English speaking children.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010 Feb;53(1):160-78. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/07-0064).
9
A disadvantage in bilingual sentence production modulated by syntactic frequency and similarity across languages.
Cognition. 2013 Nov;129(2):256-63. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.008. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
10
Monitoring speech production and comprehension: Where is the second-language delay?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Jul;72(7):1601-1619. doi: 10.1177/1747021818807447. Epub 2018 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

2
Does bilingualism come with linguistic costs? A meta-analytic review of the bilingual lexical deficit.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Jun;30(3):897-913. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02136-7. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
3
Speaker Accent Modulates the Effects of Orthographic and Phonological Similarity on Auditory Processing by Learners of English.
Front Psychol. 2022 May 19;13:892822. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.892822. eCollection 2022.
5
Why is Lexical Retrieval Slower for Bilinguals? Evidence from Picture Naming.
Biling (Camb Engl). 2018 May;21(3):479-488. doi: 10.1017/S1366728917000694. Epub 2017 Dec 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Bilingual Minds.
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2009 Dec;10(3):89-129. doi: 10.1177/1529100610387084.
2
Frequency effects in monolingual and bilingual natural reading.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Oct;22(5):1216-34. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0819-2.
3
Proficiency and Linguistic Complexity Influence Speech Motor Control and Performance in Spanish Language Learners.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Jun;58(3):653-68. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-S-13-0299.
4
Cognitive advantage in bilingualism: an example of publication bias?
Psychol Sci. 2015 Jan;26(1):99-107. doi: 10.1177/0956797614557866. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
5
The Aging Neighborhood: Phonological Density in Naming.
Lang Cogn Process. 2014 Jan 1;29(3):326-344. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2013.837495.
6
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
7
Reconciling phonological neighborhood effects in speech production through single trial analysis.
Cogn Psychol. 2014 Feb;68:33-58. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.10.001. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
8
There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing.
Cogn Psychol. 2013 Mar;66(2):232-58. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.12.002. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
9
The word frequency effect in first- and second-language word recognition: a lexical entrenchment account.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(5):843-63. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.720994. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
10
Does bilingualism twist your tongue?
Cognition. 2012 Dec;125(3):491-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Sep 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验