Niebuhr Tobias, Junge Mirko, Rosén Erik
Universität Hamburg, Fachbereich Mathematik, Germany.
Volkswagen AG, Konzernforschung: Fahrerassistenz und Integrierte Sicherheit, Germany.
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Jan;86:121-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.10.026. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
Older adults and pedestrians both represent especially vulnerable groups in traffic. In the literature, hazards are usually described by the corresponding injury risks of a collision. This paper investigates the MAIS3+F risk (the risk of sustaining at least one injury of AIS 3 severity or higher, or fatal injury) for pedestrians in full-frontal pedestrian-to-passenger car collisions. Using some assumptions, a model-based approach to injury risk, allowing for the specification of individual injury risk parameters for individuals, is presented. To balance model accuracy and sample size, the GIDAS (German In-depth Accident Study) data set is divided into three age groups; children (0-14); adults (15-60); and older adults (older than 60). For each group, individual risk curves are computed. Afterwards, the curves are re-aggregated to the overall risk function. The derived model addresses the influence of age on the outcome of pedestrian-to-car accidents. The results show that older people compared with younger people have a higher MAIS3+F injury risk at all collision speeds. The injury risk for children behaves surprisingly. Compared to other age groups, their MAIS3+F injury risk is lower at lower collision speeds, but substantially higher once a threshold has been exceeded. The resulting injury risk curve obtained by re-aggregation looks surprisingly similar to the frequently used logistic regression function computed for the overall injury risk. However, for homogenous subgroups - such as the three age groups - logistic regression describes the typical risk behavior less accurately than the introduced model-based approach. Since the effect of demographic change on traffic safety is greater nowadays, there is a need to incorporate age into established models. Thus far, this is one of the first studies incorporating traffic participant age to an explicit risk function. The presented approach can be especially useful for the modeling and prediction of risks, and for the evaluation of advanced driver assistance systems.
老年人和行人在交通中均属于特别易受伤害的群体。在文献中,危险通常是根据碰撞对应的受伤风险来描述的。本文研究了在行人与乘用车正面碰撞事故中行人的MAIS3 + F风险(即遭受至少一处AIS 3级及以上严重程度损伤或致命伤的风险)。通过一些假设,提出了一种基于模型的伤害风险方法,该方法允许为个体指定个体伤害风险参数。为了平衡模型准确性和样本量,将GIDAS(德国深度事故研究)数据集分为三个年龄组:儿童(0 - 14岁);成年人(15 - 60岁);以及老年人(60岁以上)。针对每个组计算个体风险曲线。之后,将这些曲线重新汇总为总体风险函数。所推导的模型考虑了年龄对行人与汽车事故结果的影响。结果表明,在所有碰撞速度下,老年人与年轻人相比具有更高的MAIS3 + F伤害风险。儿童的伤害风险表现令人惊讶。与其他年龄组相比,他们在较低碰撞速度下的MAIS3 + F伤害风险较低,但一旦超过某个阈值则会大幅升高。通过重新汇总得到的伤害风险曲线看起来与为总体伤害风险计算的常用逻辑回归函数惊人地相似。然而,对于同质亚组——例如这三个年龄组——逻辑回归对典型风险行为的描述不如所引入的基于模型的方法准确。由于如今人口结构变化对交通安全的影响更大,有必要将年龄纳入现有模型。到目前为止,这是首批将交通参与者年龄纳入显式风险函数的研究之一。所提出的方法对于风险建模和预测以及先进驾驶辅助系统的评估可能特别有用。