• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别记忆的反应动态:敏感性和偏差。

The response dynamics of recognition memory: Sensitivity and bias.

作者信息

Koop Gregory J, Criss Amy H

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Syracuse University.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 May;42(5):671-85. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000202. Epub 2015 Nov 23.

DOI:10.1037/xlm0000202
PMID:26595069
Abstract

Advances in theories of memory are hampered by insufficient metrics for measuring memory. The goal of this paper is to further the development of model-independent, sensitive empirical measures of the recognition decision process. We evaluate whether metrics from continuous mouse tracking, or response dynamics, uniquely identify response bias and mnemonic evidence, and demonstrate 1 application of these metrics to the strength-based mirror-effect paradigm. In 4 studies, we show that response dynamics can augment our current analytic repertoire in a way that speaks to the psychological mechanisms underlying recognition memory. We manipulated familiarity and response bias via encoding strength and the proportion of targets at test (Experiment 1) and found that the initial degree of deviation of the mouse movement toward a response is a robust indicator of response bias. In order to better isolate measures of memory strength, we next minimized response bias through the use of 2-alternative forced-choice tests (Experiments 2 and 3). Changes in the direction of movement along the x-axis provided an indication of encoding strength. We conclude by applying these metrics to the typical strength-based mirror effect design (Experiment 4) in an attempt to further discriminate between differentiation and criterion-shift accounts. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

记忆理论的进展受到测量记忆的指标不足的阻碍。本文的目的是进一步发展独立于模型的、对识别决策过程敏感的实证测量方法。我们评估连续鼠标追踪或反应动态指标是否能唯一地识别反应偏差和记忆证据,并展示这些指标在基于强度的镜像效应范式中的一种应用。在四项研究中,我们表明反应动态可以以一种与识别记忆背后的心理机制相关的方式扩展我们当前的分析方法。我们通过编码强度和测试中目标的比例来操纵熟悉度和反应偏差(实验1),发现鼠标向反应方向移动的初始偏差程度是反应偏差的有力指标。为了更好地分离记忆强度的测量方法,我们接下来通过使用二选一强制选择测试(实验2和3)来最小化反应偏差。沿x轴运动方向的变化表明了编码强度。我们通过将这些指标应用于典型的基于强度的镜像效应设计(实验4)来得出结论,试图进一步区分辨别和标准转移解释。(PsycINFO数据库记录)

相似文献

1
The response dynamics of recognition memory: Sensitivity and bias.识别记忆的反应动态:敏感性和偏差。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 May;42(5):671-85. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000202. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
2
Differentiation and response bias in episodic memory: evidence from reaction time distributions.情景记忆的分化和反应偏差:来自反应时分布的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Mar;36(2):484-99. doi: 10.1037/a0018435.
3
Investigating strength and frequency effects in recognition memory using type-2 signal detection theory.使用二类信号检测理论研究识别记忆中的强度和频率效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Jan;35(1):57-80. doi: 10.1037/a0013865.
4
The distribution of subjective memory strength: list strength and response bias.主观记忆强度的分布:列表强度和反应偏差。
Cogn Psychol. 2009 Dec;59(4):297-319. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.07.003. Epub 2009 Sep 17.
5
Age and response bias: evidence from the strength-based mirror effect.年龄与反应偏差:基于力量的镜像效应的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014 Oct;67(10):1910-24. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.874037. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
6
Decomposing bias in different types of simple decisions.分解不同类型简单决策中的偏差。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Mar;40(2):385-398. doi: 10.1037/a0034851. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
7
Confidence in forced-choice recognition: What underlies the ratings?对迫选识别的信心:评级的依据是什么?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Apr;43(4):552-564. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000321. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
8
The Warrington Recognition Memory Test for words as a measure of response bias: total score and response time cutoffs developed on "real world" credible and noncredible subjects.作为反应偏差测量指标的沃灵顿词语识别记忆测验:基于“真实世界”可信和不可信被试开发的总得分和反应时截断值。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2010 Feb;25(1):60-70. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acp088. Epub 2009 Nov 11.
9
Aging and confidence judgments in item recognition.项目识别中的衰老与信心判断
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Jan;44(1):1-23. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000425. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
10
Exploring the self-ownership effect: Separating stimulus and response biases.探索自我所有权效应:区分刺激偏差和反应偏差。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Feb;44(2):295-306. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000455. Epub 2017 Sep 21.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of target detection on memory retrieval.目标检测对记忆检索的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Apr;86(3):838-854. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02851-4. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
2
The temporal development of memory processes in source monitoring: An investigation with mouse tracking.来源监测中记忆过程的时间发展:使用鼠标追踪的研究。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Dec;30(6):2305-2314. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02289-z. Epub 2023 May 3.
3
A distributional and dynamic theory of pricing and preference.一种关于定价和偏好的分布动态理论。
Psychol Rev. 2020 Nov;127(6):1053-1078. doi: 10.1037/rev0000215. Epub 2020 May 28.
4
Design factors in mouse-tracking: What makes a difference?鼠标追踪设计因素:哪些因素起作用?
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Feb;52(1):317-341. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01228-y.
5
A strength-based mirror effect persists even when criterion shifts are unlikely.即使在标准变化不太可能的情况下,基于优势的镜像效应仍然存在。
Mem Cognit. 2019 May;47(4):842-854. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00906-8.
6
Generalized Processing Tree Models: Jointly Modeling Discrete and Continuous Variables.广义处理树模型:联合建模离散和连续变量。
Psychometrika. 2018 Dec;83(4):893-918. doi: 10.1007/s11336-018-9622-0. Epub 2018 May 24.
7
The reliability of criterion shifting in recognition memory is task dependent.识别记忆中标准转移的可靠性取决于任务。
Mem Cognit. 2016 Nov;44(8):1215-1227. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0633-8.